Pentax E70 vs Samsung HZ30W
94 Imaging
32 Features
11 Overall
23
91 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
Pentax E70 vs Samsung HZ30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 175g - 94 x 61 x 26mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2010
- Alternative Name is WB600
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Pentax Optio E70 vs Samsung HZ30W: A Hands-On Comparison for Everyday Photographers
In the crowded world of compact digital cameras, the Pentax Optio E70 and Samsung HZ30W stand out as interesting choices from the late 2000s to early 2010s era. Although both fall within the "compact" category and share similarly sized 1/2.3" CCD sensors, there's much more beneath the surface that sets them apart. I’ve spent extensive time testing these two models, and in this deep dive, I’ll unpack their real-world capabilities across a broad range of photography styles and deliver thoughtful insights to help you decide if either deserves a spot in your kit.
I’ll be frank: neither camera is cutting-edge by today’s standards, but within their vintage niches, each has strengths and quirks worth knowing about. My experience testing thousands of cameras informs every word here - I’m pointing out practical trade-offs and advising who will benefit most from these models now or in used markets. So grab a coffee and let’s dig into this detailed comparison.
Size, Build, and Handling: Compactness Meets Ergonomics
First impressions matter, and handling the Pentax E70 versus Samsung HZ30W gives you a quick feel for what each was designed for.

The Pentax Optio E70 is a very pocket-friendly camera with dimensions of 94x61x26mm and a featherweight 175g, powered by standard AA batteries - a practical choice for travelers who want easy battery replacements anywhere. The slim, rounded corners make it quite comfortable for casual snaps, though it lacks any weather sealing. My experience with the E70 handling confirms it fits snugly in smaller pockets yet can feel a bit utilitarian when shooting for longer periods.
In contrast, the Samsung HZ30W is larger and heavier at 107x61x28mm and 245g. This looks to accommodate its more ambitious 15x superzoom lens. The increased size translates into a more substantial grip, which I appreciated during extended handheld sessions, especially with longer telephoto shots. The HZ30W also features a built-in optical image stabilizer to help steady those zoomed-in images. Like the E70, the HZ30W lacks weather sealing, so careful use in adverse conditions is advised.
Ergonomically, the Pentax’s smooth plastic body does its best to remain comfortable, but the Samsung’s slightly larger form factor invites a steadier hold, which is key when utilizing its massive zoom range. Neither camera offers a viewfinder, so you’ll rely heavily on the LCD screen in bright daylight - more on that shortly.
Control Layout and User Interface: How It Feels to Shoot
When capturing fleeting moments, intuitive controls and quick access to settings can make or break your experience.

Looking at their top plates, the Pentax E70 adopts a very minimalist control philosophy - there’s no dedicated mode dial, nor aperture or shutter priority modes. The camera is essentially point-and-shoot with auto modes, some scene presets, and very limited exposure compensation options. This simplicity is approachable for absolute beginners or casual users who want snapshots without fuss.
By comparison, the Samsung HZ30W offers a much richer control set: it boasts full manual exposure, shutter priority, and aperture priority modes, as well as exposure compensation adjustments. Such features give enthusiasts and hobbyists the flexibility to creatively craft their images - a real boon for photography enthusiasts diving into technical shooting. The HZ30W’s top plate also includes a dedicated mode dial, making switching quickly between shooting modes straightforward.
In daily use, I found controlling the Samsung more satisfying for deliberate photography, while the Pentax was better suited to quick point-and-shoot operations.
Sensor and Image Quality: Tiny Sensors, Big Differences
Both cameras utilize a 1/2.3" CCD sensor, common in compact cameras of their vintage, but image quality is surprisingly affected by their distinct sensor resolutions and processing pipelines.

The Pentax E70 features a 10-megapixel sensor delivering images up to 3648 x 2736 resolution. Its native ISO range starts at 64, maxing out at ISO 6400, though image quality at high ISOs is noticeably noisy. The lack of raw file support restricts post-processing flexibility - JPEG is the only output, which is baked in camera.
The Samsung HZ30W ups this to a 12-megapixel sensor (4000 x 3000 max resolution) with a native ISO range of 80 to 3200. While still CCD-based, the HZ30W’s sensor arrangement and H.264-encoded video hint at a slightly evolved processing pipeline. Despite sharing similar sensor sizes, the Samsung’s images retain marginally better detail and color accuracy in daylight, though dynamic range is limited similarly in both.
My lab testing reinforced that at ISO 80-400, the Samsung’s shots held better fine detail and less color smudging compared to the Pentax, which produced softer images with more muted colors. Both struggled beyond ISO 800, making them better suited for well-lit conditions.
Screen and Viewfinder: Your Composing Window
Neither camera includes a traditional viewfinder, pushing all framing and reviewing to the rear LCD, so screen quality must be highly scrutinized.

The Pentax E70 sports a small fixed 2.4-inch display with a paltry resolution of 112,000 pixels. This screen looks quite outdated by today’s standards, exhibiting muddy colors, low brightness, and a grainy preview. In bright outdoor shoots, the screen is difficult to read accurately, which hampers precise composition and focus confirmation.
The Samsung HZ30W improves the game with a 3-inch fixed screen at 230,000 pixels - more than double the Pentax’s pixel density. The larger screen size combined with higher resolution delivers clearer previews with better color fidelity and contrast. While still not a touchscreen, the Samsung’s LCD greatly eases image review and menu navigation under a range of lighting situations.
My shooting experience made the Samsung’s screen the real standout in this section - it’s simply more confidence-inspiring to frame and assess shots in the field.
Lens Versatility: From Standard Zoom to Superzoom Adventures
The optics are the Pentax E70’s and Samsung HZ30W’s defining features, directly shaping photographic opportunities.
The Pentax E70 has a fixed 35-105mm (35mm equivalent) lens with a modest 3x optical zoom and aperture ranging from f/3.1 at wide to f/5.9 at full telephoto. This range works well for basic subjects: portraits, casual walk-around, and moderate telephoto. Its closest macro focusing distance sits at 10cm, enabling straightforward close-ups though with limited magnification.
Contrast this with the Samsung HZ30W’s impressive 24-360mm (15x zoom) lens, giving an expansive field of vision from wide-angle to super telephoto. The aperture range is similar (f/3.2 to f/5.8), but this powerful zoom transforms it into a versatile bridge camera capable of tackling landscape panoramas, distant wildlife, and architectural details. The macro focusing distance tightens to 3cm, which is particularly impressive for this category, enabling detailed close-ups.
During my outdoor tests, the flexibility of the Samsung’s long zoom proved invaluable when capturing wildlife from a distance or tight compositions without changing position. The Pentax felt more limited in framing options but held its ground in daylight portraiture thanks to its simpler lens optics.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Sharpening Action and Capturing Moments
The autofocus (AF) system can make or break candid and fast-moving subjects.
The Pentax E70 employs a 9-point contrast-detection AF system without face or eye detection. It supports single AF only, no continuous tracking nor subject recognition features. In my trials, focus was occasionally hesitant in low contrast or dim situations, and hunting was noticeable, meaning you could miss fleeting moments easily. Burst shooting isn't available, so capturing rapid action is impractical.
The Samsung HZ30W, while also relying on contrast-detection AF, brings some welcome improvements such as center-weighted and multiarea AF selections plus an AF tracking option. Although face detection is absent, the tracking functionality helps keep subjects focused in tight framing scenarios somewhat better. Manual focus is supported, offering creative control missing in the Pentax.
Burst rates on the HZ30W remain modest, but the shutter priority and manual exposure modes allow for faster shutter speeds to freeze motion when lighting permits.
From photographing city street scenes to outdoor sports, I preferred the Samsung’s responsiveness overall. The Pentax is better suited to static or posed compositions.
Image Stabilization and Shutter Range: Sharpening Your Shots
Image stabilization is essential, especially for compact cameras with limited telephoto reach.
The Pentax E70 lacks any form of image stabilization - a severe limitation for handheld telephoto or low-light shots. When zooming towards 105mm equivalent or using slower shutter speeds, camera shake becomes very noticeable in my handheld testing.
Conversely, the Samsung HZ30W includes optical image stabilization (OIS), a huge advantage when shooting at the 360mm end of its zoom. I consistently captured sharper images without the need for a tripod, even in dimmer lighting conditions or moderate hand tremors.
Examining shutter speed ranges, the Pentax offers a minimum of 4 seconds and max of 1/2000s; the Samsung extends slightly slower to 16 seconds minimum, helpful for night photography or creative long exposures.
For steady shooting flexibility, the Samsung’s OIS is by far the winner here, enabling handheld low-light and telephoto shots the Pentax could never achieve.
Video Capabilities: Basic but Functional
Neither camera targets serious videographers, but casual video capture is supported.
The Pentax E70 records 720p HD (1280x720) video at 30fps using the older Motion JPEG format, which results in larger file sizes and less compression efficiency. No external microphone input is available, limiting audio quality control.
The Samsung HZ30W also delivers 720p HD videos at 30fps but encodes in the more efficient H.264 format, saving storage space and preserving better clarity. Video frame rates include lower options for flexibility, and while it also lacks a microphone port, its HDMI output allows easy connection to wider monitors for playback.
In the field, Samsung’s videos showed marginally better sharpness and cleaner compression artifacts. Both cameras are best for casual capture given no advanced video features such as 4K or slow motion.
Battery Life and Storage: Staying Powered and Loaded
Powering your camera reliably during trips is vital - and so is storage flexibility.
The Pentax E70 uses 2x AA batteries - a big plus for travelers who can find replacements globally, and testing showed decent longevity, though performance varies by battery type (alkaline vs rechargeable NiMH).
The Samsung HZ30W relies on a proprietary rechargeable battery (SLB-11A), which delivers respectable charge life but requires careful charging management, especially in longer shoots. Without battery spares or external charging options, extended outdoor sessions can be risky.
Both cameras use SD/SDHC cards, but the HZ30W also adds SDXC compatibility, future-proofing you for larger storage needs.
Connectivity and Extras: More Than Just Photos
Connectivity is sparse on both models; both lack wireless features such as Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, a common absence at their time of release.
The Pentax offers USB 2.0 for file transfer but no HDMI out. The Samsung adds HDMI output, useful for direct playback on TVs.
Neither camera offers GPS tagging or rugged sealing against the elements.
Real-World Shooting Across Photography Genres
Let me share my experiences shooting both cameras in various scenarios to reveal their performances beyond specs.
Portraiture
While neither supports face or eye detection AF, the Samsung’s manual exposure control and longer zoom range let me shape portraits creatively, with decent background separation at 360mm. The Pentax’s shorter zoom limited framing options, though its image quality was acceptable for casual portraits in good light.
Landscape
The Samsung’s wider 24mm equivalent excels for broad vistas, combined with its larger 3-inch screen aiding composition. The Pentax’s 35mm wide end felt constrained. Neither camera’s small sensor matched the dynamic range modern mirrorless bodies offer, but under good daylight, I was able to produce usable landscape shots.
Wildlife
The Samsung’s 15x zoom and AF tracking make occasional distant wildlife shots feasible, especially stationary subjects. The Pentax’s 3x zoom and slower AF made this frustrating.
Sports
Neither camera has fast burst modes or rapid AF, so both struggled with fast action sports. The Samsung’s shutter priority mode helped freeze some motion.
Street
The Pentax’s small size was an advantage for discreet street photography, though slow AF hindered opportunistic shots. The Samsung’s size and louder zoom motor made it less stealthy but more versatile framing-wise.
Macro
Samsung’s 3cm minimum focus distance allowed capturing crisp flora and textures. The Pentax, at 10cm, gave less dramatic close-ups.
Night/Astro
Samsung’s 16s max shutter beats the Pentax’s 4s for low-light long-exposure. Lack of raw limits editing in both.
Video
Samsung had crisper video capture overall, courtesy of H.264 and better sensor readout.
Travel
Pentax’s AA batteries and lightweight body make it a take-anywhere companion. Samsung balances this with versatility from the zoom but carries more bulk and battery management needs.
Professional Work
Both cameras are consumer-grade with no raw support; thus, they are unsuitable for professional workflows requiring flexibility, high image quality, and durability.
Sample Image Comparison
Let’s look at side-by-side comparisons from both cameras to see their output characteristics:
From landscapes to close-ups, the Samsung images exhibit tighter resolution and marginal color vibrance, while the Pentax photos have softer looks but remain usable for casual sharing.
Overall Performance Ratings
Summarizing comprehensive testing:
The Samsung HZ30W ranks higher overall due to its lens versatility, improved screen, better autofocus functionalities, and image stabilization.
Genre-Specific Scores
A more nuanced look reveals strengths and weaknesses per use case:
The Pentax shines for basic street and travel simplicity, while the Samsung dominates in wildlife, macro, and landscape categories due to flexibility.
My Conclusions and Recommendations
After thorough hands-on evaluation and testing, here’s my candid advice:
Choose the Pentax Optio E70 if:
- You want a highly compact, pocketable camera for casual shooting.
- You prioritize simple point-and-shoot operation without fuss.
- You favor AA batteries for convenience on the road.
- Your budgets are tight (it tends to be more affordable used).
- Your photographic needs are limited to daylight snapshots and daylight portraits.
Opt for the Samsung HZ30W if:
- You desire versatile framing from ultrawide to superzoom telephoto.
- You value manual exposure controls to experiment and learn photography basics.
- You shoot more in variable lighting conditions requiring stabilization.
- You want a bigger, brighter screen for confident framing.
- Budget permits for a slightly pricier package with better performance.
Final Thoughts
Neither camera will compete with modern mirrorless or DSLR standards today, but both represent solid options in used camera markets offering unique advantages: Pentax E70 as a compact day-to-day snapshot companion, Samsung HZ30W as a capable all-in-one superzoom.
For photography enthusiasts seeking a lightweight, easy-to-use camera, the Pentax suffices. But for those wanting to explore creative techniques, zoom range, and slightly better image quality, the Samsung HZ30W is the clear winner.
Ultimately, understanding your priorities - whether simplicity or versatility - will guide the best choice.
I hope this detailed comparison helps you make an informed decision. Every camera I review undergoes extensive real-world testing, and I’m always happy to share these insights. If you have more questions or want to see specific shoot examples, feel free to reach out!
Happy shooting!
Pentax E70 vs Samsung HZ30W Specifications
| Pentax Optio E70 | Samsung HZ30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model type | Pentax Optio E70 | Samsung HZ30W |
| Also called as | - | WB600 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-01-05 | 2010-01-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.4" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 112k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175 grams (0.39 lbs) | 245 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 61 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.0") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $140 | $280 |