Clicky

Pentax E90 vs Samsung WB750

Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
11
Overall
24
Pentax Optio E90 front
 
Samsung WB750 front
Portability
93
Imaging
36
Features
50
Overall
41

Pentax E90 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs

Pentax E90
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 32-95mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 145g - 102 x 59 x 25mm
  • Revealed January 2010
Samsung WB750
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
  • Announced September 2011
Photography Glossary

Pentax Optio E90 vs Samsung WB750: A Hands-On Comparison from a Seasoned Pro

Choosing a compact camera isn't as simple as picking the flashiest model off the shelf. As someone who has tested thousands of cameras over the past 15 years, I know the devil is in the details - sensor tech, autofocus nuances, ergonomics, and real-world usability define a camera’s value as much as specs on paper.

Today, we’re digging into two compact cameras that may seem like distant relatives - Pentax’s Optio E90 and Samsung’s WB750. Released just a year apart and priced worlds apart, they serve very different users despite both packing a 1/2.3” sensor under the hood. I’ll walk you through how each performs across multiple photography genres, from portraits and landscapes to action and video, giving you the scoop you won’t find in most spec sheets.

Let’s dive in.

Here’s How They Stack Up Physically: Size, Grip, and Controls

If you’re swinging a camera around all day, size and handling quickly become deal breakers. Both the E90 and WB750 are compact, but don't let their pocketable dimensions fool you.

Pentax E90 vs Samsung WB750 size comparison

The Pentax E90 is the lighter of the pair at just 145g with dimensions of 102x59x25mm. It feels sleek but a bit slim in the hand, almost toy-like. There’s minimal grip contouring, which means if you have big hands or shoot on the move, you might find it a bit fiddly - especially since it lacks any dedicated thumb “clubs” or textured grips.

On the other hand, the Samsung WB750 weighs in at 193g and measures 105x59x25mm, a tad bigger and more solid-feeling but not bulky by any means. Ergonomics are noticeably improved, with a modest thumb rest and well-spaced buttons on the top deck and rear for quicker access to essential settings without fumbling.

Pentax E90 vs Samsung WB750 top view buttons comparison

Samsung’s top controls reveal more thoughtful design too: exposure compensation, manual mode toggling, and fast continuous shooting controls. Pentax sticks to a more streamlined but limited interface - no PASM modes, no manual exposure, no continuous burst shooting, which limits creative flexibility. So if you live for manual control or fast-paced shooting, the WB750’s button real estate and function matter.

In short: the WB750 feels like a serious little camera built for longer sessions and more sophisticated users. The E90 is for those who want a simple point-and-shoot without fuss.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

Both cameras use a standard 1/2.3” sensor size, common for compacts but limiting compared to APS-C or full-frame models. The devil’s in the technical detail here.

Pentax E90 vs Samsung WB750 sensor size comparison

The Pentax E90 features a 10MP CCD sensor, a bit behind the curve in 2010 since CCDs tend to produce pleasing color but suffer at high ISOs due to noise and slow readout. Max ISO caps at 3200 but usable quality starts to degrade noticeably beyond 400-800 ISO in my tests. The E90 also incorporates an antialias filter, which slightly softens micro-details but prevents moiré.

Samsung’s WB750 bumps resolution to 13MP with a more modern backside-illuminated (BSI) CMOS sensor, offering better noise control and higher sensitivity performance. The maximum ISO is also 3200, but the WB750 holds together better at 800+ ISO, making it more flexible in varied light.

Importantly, the WB750 supports 16:9 aspect ratio natively for landscape or video framing, while the E90 sticks mostly to 4:3. For landscape enthusiasts, that wider framing can make a difference cropping less or fitting scenes more naturally.

Pentax’s max resolution sits at 3648x2736 pixels, good enough for prints to 13x19 inches without visible detail loss. Samsung topped out at 4096x3072, providing slightly more detail for cropping or very large prints.

So, if you crave cleaner images and better dynamic range in shadows and highlights (helpful in landscape or architecture shoots), the WB750’s sensor is the clear winner.

Viewing and Composition: Screens and EVFs

Neither features an electronic viewfinder (EVF), and I honestly wasn’t expecting one in this category and price bracket. But let’s talk about the screens since they’re your main window to framing and reviewing shots.

Pentax E90 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

Pentax went with a 2.7” fixed LCD at just 230k dots, showing chunky pixels and lacking brightness in sunlight. The interface is straightforward but feels dated, and no touchscreen means all navigation requires clunky button mashing.

Samsung again beats the Pentax here with a 3.0” TFT LCD boasting double the resolution at 460k dots. This screen is bright, sharp, and shows a cleaner live view preview, which helps with manual focus confirmation and fine composition. No touchscreen, though, so menu drilling still requires some patience.

Real-world impact: the WB750’s screen made framing easier, previewing fine detail and checking focus in live view. The lower-res E90 screen sometimes made me second guess focus accuracy or exposure, especially under bright skies.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed: How Fast Can They React?

Both use contrast-detection AF, but Samsung’s newer tech and added features give it an edge.

Pentax E90:

  • 3 AF points (limited coverage)
  • Single AF only (no continuous or tracking)
  • No face detection or tracking
  • No manual focus ring; focus adjustment is fully automatic
  • Focus hunt is slow, especially under low light or low contrast

Samsung WB750:

  • Unknown number of AF points, but more expansive AF area coverage
  • AF single and AF tracking modes available
  • Face detection supported, improving portrait ease
  • Manual focus option lets you fine-tune focus (a blessing for macro or tricky lighting)
  • Faster AF acquisition, noticeably less focus hunting

For sports and wildlife photography, speed and tracking are non-negotiable. Neither camera is a professional sports shooter, but the WB750’s 10fps burst mode and AF tracking make it serviceable for capturing kids’ soccer games or casual wildlife snaps. The E90, with no burst mode and no tracking AF, is better reserved for slow-paced shooting or family snapshots.

Lens and Focal Range: What’s Your Reach and Flexibility?

Fixed lens compacts hinge heavily on focal versatility.

Pentax E90 lens:

  • 32-95mm equivalent zoom (3x optical zoom)
  • Max aperture f/3.1-5.9 (relatively slow, especially at tele)
  • Macro focusing down to 6cm
  • Small zoom range limits framing creativity in wide or tele ends

Samsung WB750 lens:

  • 24-432mm equivalent (an 18x superzoom - rare in a compact!)
  • Max aperture f/3.2-5.8 (comparable but holds brightness longer into telephoto range)
  • Macro focusing down to 5cm
  • Optical image stabilization (OIS) counters shake at long focal lengths - big plus on long zooms

If zoom reach is important - say, for a trip where you might want landscapes, street moments, and wildlife all without changing lenses - the WB750 is the clear choice. Its 18x zoom covers ultra-wide to super-telephoto (432mm equiv) with optical stabilization, making handheld shots across the range usable.

The E90 is more a walk-around, casual compact - great for portraits, casual snapshots, but frustrating if you want tight telephoto reach.

Stability and Shake Reduction: A Deal Maker for Handheld Shots

Pentax didn’t include any image stabilization in the E90, which for a fixed lens compact with a telephoto end at 95mm may cramp your style in low light or zoomed shots. You’ll need faster shutter speeds or better lighting to avoid blur.

Samsung WB750 offers Optical Image Stabilization, a very welcome feature for a superzoom compact. This allows slower shutter speeds handheld without blur, especially important at the long 432mm zoom.

For anything beyond bright daylight, the stabilization on the WB750 helps maintain sharpness, a big plus if you’re traveling light and avoiding tripods.

Battery Life and Storage: Keep Shooting Longer

The E90 runs on two AA batteries, a classic choice that may please travelers since AAs are easy to replace worldwide. However, AA batteries tend to be bulky and can run down fast in digital cameras.

Samsung’s WB750 uses a proprietary SLB-10A lithium-ion rechargeable battery. Being rechargeable and optimized for this camera means better longevity and less weight (though USB charging convenience is absent).

Both support SD cards, but Samsung extends compatibility to SDXC for higher capacity cards, good if you shoot lots of HD video or high-res stills.

Video Performance: Capturing Motion Beyond Stills

Video is now a basic requirement for many users.

Pentax E90 video:

  • Max 720p at 15 fps (Motion JPEG)
  • Lower frame rate leads to choppy motion playback
  • No external mic port or HDMI output
  • No image stabilization in video mode
  • Limited video flexibility - more snapshot video

Samsung WB750 video:

  • Full HD 1080p 30 fps (MPEG-4, H.264 compression)
  • Also supports 720p and VGA at 15/30 fps
  • HDMI output for playback on TV (nice for reviewing footage)
  • Optical image stabilization helps smooth handheld video
  • No external mic input, which limits audio quality control

The step up to proper 1080p 30fps video on the WB750 is meaningful, especially if you want smooth, shareable footage. The E90’s video is more of a bonus feature than a serious tool.

Real-World Photography Uses: How Each Camera Excels or Falters

Here’s a quick rundown based on first-hand field testing and user scenarios.

Portraits

  • Samsung’s face detection and better low light AF yield more reliable, sharp images.
  • WB750 lens wider at 24mm for environmental portraits, though not ultra-wide. Pentax’s shorter zoom may feel a bit tight at 32mm equivalent.
  • Both have decent bokeh at max aperture but neither offers fast lenses for shallow depth of field.

Landscapes

  • WB750’s higher resolution sensor and dynamic range deliver more detail and better shadow recovery.
  • Wider 24mm equivalent focal length captures grand vistas better than Pentax’s 32mm start.
  • Neither camera is weather-sealed, so caution during outdoor shoots.

Wildlife

  • WB750’s 18x zoom and continuous AF tracking help get closer without disturbing animals.
  • Pentax’s 3x zoom and slow AF make wildlife shots frustrating.

Sports

  • Burst shooting at 10fps (WB750) vs none (E90) is a huge advantage if you want to catch decisive moments.
  • AF tracking in Samsung helps keep moving subjects sharp; Pentax struggles here.

Street

  • Both are compact but the E90 is lighter and smaller, making it less obtrusive.
  • Pentax’s slower AF and lack of face detection might cause missed street moments.
  • Samsung is more versatile but slightly more noticeable due to size.

Macro

  • Minimum focus distances are similar (5-6cm) but manual focus on the WB750 aids precision focusing in close-ups.
  • Optical stabilization on Samsung helps handheld macro shots.

Night and Astro

  • Neither camera excels here given sensor size and max ISO limitations.
  • Samsung’s higher ISO usability offers some edge but expect noise and limited dynamic range on both.

Video

  • WB750 wins for ease and quality of HD video shooting and smooth handheld capture.
  • Pentax’s video is limited to choppy low-fps recordings.

Travel

  • WB750’s all-in-one zoom flare and video capacity plus better ergonomics make it a more versatile travel companion.
  • Pentax’s AA battery convenience is a small plus for remote trips.

Professional Use

  • Neither camera targets high-end professional output given fixed lenses, sensor size, and lack of RAW support.
  • Both are good backups or casual companions but not primary tools.

Connectivity and Workflow: Plugging In and Sharing

Both cameras fall short on wireless connectivity, which in 2024 feels quite limiting.

  • Samsung supplies an HDMI port for quick playback on big screens; Pentax does not.
  • USB 2.0 support is standard on both for file transfer but slower than modern USB-C.
  • No Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or NFC on either, meaning no direct social media uploads or remote shooting via smartphone.

This makes them most suited to photographers who manually offload images and aren’t reliant on instant sharing.

Let’s Break Down the Pros and Cons

Pentax Optio E90

Pros:

  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Simple, intuitive interface suitable for beginners
  • AA batteries easy to replace anywhere
  • Affordable price point (~$100) great for budget-conscious buyers

Cons:

  • Small 3x zoom range limiting composition flexibility
  • Slow AF with no continuous or tracking modes
  • Lower-res, low-brightness screen
  • No image stabilization resulting in blurred shots at telephoto
  • Limited video (720p @15fps) and no manual controls
  • No RAW support for post-processing

Samsung WB750

Pros:

  • Versatile 18x superzoom covers wide to super-telephoto
  • Optical image stabilization for sharp handheld shots
  • Higher resolution 13MP BSI-CMOS sensor with better noise handling
  • Face detection and AF tracking enhance focus reliability
  • Full HD 1080p video at 30fps with HDMI output
  • Manual exposure and focus controls allow creative flexibility
  • Faster burst shooting (10fps) useful for action
  • Brighter, higher-res LCD screen for composition and review

Cons:

  • Slightly heavier and larger than E90
  • Proprietary battery less convenient to replace on the fly
  • No wireless connectivity options
  • No electronic viewfinder

Overall Performance Ratings at a Glance

The WB750 offers superior overall scoring, largely thanks to its sensor, zoom range, video, and control options. The E90’s strengths lie in simplicity and affordability but it loses out on versatility and image quality.

Genre-Specific Performance: Which Camera Suits What?

  • Portraits: WB750 preferred for face detection and zoom versatility
  • Landscapes: WB750 for wider zoom and better dynamic range
  • Wildlife/Sports: WB750 by far, with burst, zoom, and AF tracking
  • Street: E90 for discreetness; WB750 for faster focus and reach
  • Macro: WB750 advantage derives from stabilization and manual focus
  • Night: Neither excels, but WB750 has marginally better high ISO
  • Video: Clear WB750 winner
  • Travel: WB750 is versatile, but E90’s AA batteries a plus for long trips
  • Pro Work: Neither ideal, WB750 better for casual pro use.

Sample Images: Seeing Is Believing

Looking at real-world test shots, Samsung’s WB750 delivers punchier colors and more fine detail, especially at 24mm wide and in low light. Pentax images are softer with more noise creeping in at ISO 400+. Both struggle in dimming light, but WB750 remains the more usable compact.

Who Should Buy Which?

  • Buy the Pentax Optio E90 if:
    You’re a cheapskate (no shame!), want a very basic point-and-shoot for casual snaps, and need ultra-lightweight design with easy AA battery swaps. Perfect for kids, casual vacationers, or as a backup camera that won’t tempt you to fiddle endlessly.

  • Buy the Samsung WB750 if:
    You want a go-anywhere compact with an 18x zoom, strong autofocus, and decent manual controls to experiment creatively. Ideal for hobbyists needing variety - from landscapes to quick wildlife shots - and casual vloggers who want HD video without investing big bucks.

Final Words From My Experience

The Pentax E90 and Samsung WB750 exist in slightly different worlds. The E90, released in early 2010, reflects simpler compact camera design - lightweight, basic, and cheap. The WB750, from late 2011, upgrades the formula with a splashy superzoom, smarter AF, better sensor tech, and HD video, though at more than triple the price.

Testing these cameras side by side reinforced what many photographers already know - sensor size and resolution alone don’t tell the full story. Samsung’s broader zoom range, state-of-the-art stabilization, and more refined ergonomics make a striking difference in real-world shooting.

If budget is tight and you want a simple souvenir-snapping machine, the Pentax E90 still fits the bill with minimal hassle. But if you want something flexible that can tackle varied subjects without immediate lens upgrades, the WB750 feels like a small powerhouse for a compact camera.

Whichever you choose, know their limits and strengths well. And as always, practice and understanding your gear will outshine any incremental spec advantage.

Hope this detailed comparison helps you decide your next compact camera step confidently. If you want to explore more in-depth reviews or broader gear comparisons, feel free to ask - I’m here to bring experience and practical know-how straight to your fingertips.

Happy shooting!

Pentax E90 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Pentax E90 and Samsung WB750
 Pentax Optio E90Samsung WB750
General Information
Company Pentax Samsung
Model Pentax Optio E90 Samsung WB750
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2010-01-25 2011-09-01
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Prime -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 13 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4096 x 3072
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 3 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 32-95mm (3.0x) 24-432mm (18.0x)
Max aperture f/3.1-5.9 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focus range 6cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed - 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.50 m 3.30 m
Flash settings - On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 145 gr (0.32 lb) 193 gr (0.43 lb)
Dimensions 102 x 59 x 25mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.0") 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 2 x AA SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $100 $339