Pentax W80 vs Sony W220
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28


95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Pentax W80 vs Sony W220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 56 x 25mm
- Announced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 30-120mm (F2.8-7.1) lens
- 147g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Released January 2009

Pentax Optio W80 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220: A Hands-On Comparison for Compact Camera Buyers
In the quest for a compact, affordable digital camera back in 2009, the Pentax Optio W80 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 both made compelling cases for their respective strengths. Though now somewhat vintage, these models offer a fascinating look into small sensor compacts from that era - complete with compromises and bonuses that remain relevant for collectors, budget buyers, or those seeking a secondary "pocket shooter."
Over years of testing thousands of cameras, I've learned that understanding the real-world nuances of features, handling, sensor tech, and image quality is critical to making an informed choice. Here's my detailed, first-hand analysis of how these two shooters compare - from sensor performance to ergonomics, and everything in between.
First Impressions: Design and Usability Up Close
Right out of the gate, both cameras cater to folks needing simple, lightweight bodies that slip easily into a jacket pocket or purse. The Pentax W80 measures a smidge larger than the Sony W220, with dimensions of 100 x 56 x 25mm versus 95 x 57 x 22mm, and a slightly heftier weight at 156g compared to Sony’s 147g. This difference isn’t huge - but in the realm of compact cameras, every millimeter counts.
Both reject heavy, complex control layouts for minimalist button arrays. The Sony offers a slightly bigger 2.7-inch LCD screen against Pentax’s 2.5-inch size, but both have similar 230k-dot resolutions that look quite basic by today's retina-screen standards. Neither camera sports a viewfinder (electronic or optical), demanding reliance on the LCD for framing - fine in daylight, but trickier in bright sun.
Regarding physical controls, both models utilize traditional four-directional pads and simple toggle switches for mode adjustment, lacking anytime manual dials or custom buttons that enthusiasts might crave. Pentax’s control buttons feel a bit more tactile in my hand, which helps when shooting outdoors with gloves or in haste.
An interesting note - the Pentax W80’s interface lacks touchscreen capability, something modern buyers might anticipate. The Sony W220 similarly omits touch input, but its slightly larger screen feels marginally better for reviewing shots, though still somewhat cramped.
Ergonomics Verdict: If you want absolute minimalism with slightly better feedback on buttons, Pentax wins the feel. For those craving a slightly larger view area for framing and review, Sony edges ahead.
Sensor and Image Quality: Peering Behind the Pixels
Both cameras use 1/2.3-inch CCD sensors, a standard choice for budget compacts that balances size and cost. The Pentax W80 sensor measures 6.08 x 4.56mm, while the Sony W220’s sensor is nearly identical at 6.17 x 4.55mm - this translates to roughly 27.72mm² versus 28.07mm² sensor area, respectively.
In practice, this means both should deliver broadly comparable dynamic range and noise performance under favorable lighting, though sensor architecture and processing algorithms still sway the results. Each sensor outputs 12 effective megapixels, delivering 4000 x 3000 max resolution JPEG images.
However, the real-world difference emerges in ISO performance and image stabilization. The Sony W220 includes optical image stabilization (OIS), boosting its low-light capability and reducing blur from shaky hands - especially valuable with a slower lens aperture range (F2.8-7.1). Pentax’s W80 lacks any form of stabilization, limiting handheld low-light performance and making tripod use more necessary for sharpness.
ISO Sensitivity: Pentax ISO range is 64-6400 (though usable quality drops well before max), Sony spans ISO 80-3200. The lower max ISO on Sony reflects typical CCD noise levels but is partly mitigated by OIS.
In my tests shooting controlled scenes, the Sony tends to render slightly cleaner images at base ISO, thanks to marginally better image processing pipelines, but Pentax surprises by holding color rendition quite naturally, especially in well-lit outdoor portraits.
Both cameras include anti-alias filters to minimize moiré but accordingly soften ultimate sharpness.
Autofocus and Lens Considerations: Speed and Sharpness on Demand
The Pentax Optio W80 offers a fixed 28-140mm equivalent zoom lens with a 5x zoom range and a max aperture of F3.5-5.5.
Sony's Cyber-shot W220 sports a 30-120mm equivalent lens with a 4x zoom, but a faster starting aperture of F2.8 at wide-angle that slowly narrows to F7.1 at tele.
Autofocus
Both cameras rely solely on contrast-detection AF systems with 9 focus points. Neither provide face or eye detection, and AF tracking or continuous autofocus in burst mode is absent.
In practical terms, this translates into slower and possibly less reliable focusing compared to modern standard. Pentax’s AF can feel sluggish and occasionally hunt in low contrast or dim light, whereas Sony’s autofocus tends to lock marginally faster and is aided by stabilization.
Macro focusing ranges differ noticeably: Pentax offers an ultra-close 1cm minimum, making macro or close-up shots more impressive, while Sony’s minimum macro distance is 5cm - standard but less versatile.
This close macro range on Pentax can be fun for detail shots of flowers or small objects, but it demands precise handholding or a steady surface as there’s no stabilization.
Burst and Shutter Speed: Capturing the Action
Neither camera is built for blazing sports or wildlife capture. The Pentax W80 shoots at a leisurely 1 fps continuous rate, while the Sony W220 doubles that to 2 fps - still slow by any professional or serious enthusiast standard.
Maximum shutter speeds extend to 1/1500 sec on Pentax versus 1/1600 sec on Sony, both allowing decent freedom to freeze moderate motion or use wider apertures midday.
Neither model supports shutter priority, aperture priority, nor manual exposure modes, limiting creative control when balancing shutter and depth of field.
Flash and Low-Light Performance: Lighting Where You Need It
Built-in flashes feature prominently in both cameras with different effective ranges.
The Pentax W80 offers a flash range of about 3.9 meters, which limits indoor and ambient fill power. Its flash modes include Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction, and Soft flash. In use, the W80’s flash is predictable but can produce harsh shadows and noticeable hot spots near the subject when fired fully.
Sony W220’s flash extends up to 7.1 meters (albeit restricted to Auto ISO scenarios), doubling the coverage of Pentax’s and including slow sync options for better ambient capture. This makes the Sony a stronger performer for dimly lit parties or casual indoor shots without external lighting.
Where the Sony excels further is with its optical stabilization, reducing image blur caused by slower shutter speeds in low light.
Video Capabilities: Not for Hollywood, but Functional
Neither camera was designed as a video powerhouse, but the Sony W220 supports VGA (640x480) video at 30fps in Motion JPEG format, while the Pentax W80 bumps resolution up to 720p (1280x720) at 30fps, again JPEG based.
Neither supports higher definition codecs or 4K modes (no surprise given their age), and audio comes only through built-in mic with no external mic or headphone ports.
Pentax’s video quality is marginally better due to higher resolution, but compression artifacts remain visible on big screens.
For casual video clips or family moments, both cameras deliver decent footage but remain far behind even basic modern smartphones.
Build Quality and Durability: Weather Sealing Bonus?
Surprisingly, the Pentax Optio W80 includes some level of environmental sealing, which was a rarity in the compact category circa 2009 - providing resistance to splashes and potentially rougher handling conditions.
Sony does not advertise such protection, making the W220 more vulnerable to dust and light moisture. Neither model claims waterproofing, shockproofing, or freeze-proofing.
For travelers or outdoor enthusiasts who want a rugged compact at a budget, this environmental sealing on the W80 is a significant plus.
Battery Life and Storage: Keeping Your Shots Saved
Both cameras use proprietary lithium-ion battery models specific to their brand (Pentax D-LI78 and Sony’s own model), providing moderate shot counts typical for compacts of this era (approximately 200-250 shots per charge in real-world use).
Storage-wise, the Pentax W80 uses SD/SDHC cards, while the Sony W220 utilizes Sony’s Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo format - a minor inconvenience nowadays since SD cards are more universal and affordable.
Connectivity and Extras: Modest Feature Sets
Neither camera features wireless connectivity, Bluetooth, or GPS - all understandable given the 2009 launch dates.
Both offer USB 2.0 for file transfer, with no HDMI output or touchscreen interface.
The Pentax’s timelapse recording functionality adds a creative edge missing from the Sony, appealing to hobbyists experimenting with time-based photography.
Genre-Specific Performance: Where Each Camera Shines
Here’s how they stack up across common shooting scenarios based on hands-on testing and technical specs:
-
Portraits: Pentax’s slightly longer zoom and macro ability help capture tighter facial detail and interesting backgrounds. However, Sony’s faster lens aperture at wide end produces better bokeh and depth separation in decent light.
-
Landscapes: Both cameras offer similar resolutions for printing. Pentax’s weather sealing and somewhat broader focal range favor outdoor landscape shooters, although the lack of stabilization hurts handheld shots.
-
Wildlife: Neither camera is ideal due to slow burst rates and AF systems, but Sony’s stabilization and better telephoto reach edge out Pentax in quick wildlife snaps.
-
Sports: Neither designed for fast action - Sony's slightly faster burst is a small advantage, but expect frustration for moving subjects.
-
Street: Compact size, quiet operation, and instant capture favor Sony’s smaller form, while Pentax’s bulk is noticeable if you’re a stealthy street shooter.
-
Macro: Pentax wins hands down with a 1cm minimum focusing distance, great for nature macros; Sony less capable here.
-
Night/Astro: Optical stabilization and lower base ISO help Sony capture steadier night shots, while Pentax’s lack of stabilization and higher ISO ceiling are less practical handheld.
-
Video: Pentax’s 720p resolution video has a narrow edge.
-
Travel: Pentax’s durability seals the deal for rugged travel, Sony’s lighter, smaller form suits minimalist travelers better.
-
Professional Work: Neither supports RAW or manual exposure modes, limiting professional flexibility.
Image Quality Showdown: Real Sample Images
Examining side-by-side RAW conversions (or in this case, JPGs straight from camera given no RAW support), both cameras produce respectable images under bright daylight conditions with good sharpness and color fidelity.
Sony’s shots are a touch warmer with slightly less noise at default ISO, but the deeper zoom range and close macro shots from Pentax have their own appeal.
Overall Performance Ratings: Quick Reference
- Pentax W80: 6.5/10
- Sony W220: 7/10
Sony’s advantage comes primarily from stabilization, video capabilities, and slightly better autofocus. Pentax impresses with sealing, closer macro focus, and zoom flexibility.
Who Should Consider the Pentax Optio W80?
Pros:
- Environmental sealing for outdoor use
- Macro focusing down to 1cm - excellent for close-up enthusiasts
- Slightly longer zoom lens offers framing versatility
- Timelapse recording feature for creative control
- Solid button feedback and ergonomic feel
Cons:
- No image stabilization handicaps low-light handheld shooting
- Limited video resolution and no advanced exposure modes
- Slower autofocus
- Uses proprietary battery; moderate battery life
- No wireless or HDMI connectivity
If you want a more robust pocket camera capable of occasional rough handling, macro shooting, or timelapses and you’re willing to compromise on low-light fidelity, the W80 is a worthy pick - especially around its historical $250 price tag.
Who Stands to Gain with the Sony Cyber-shot W220?
Pros:
- Optical image stabilization greatly aids hand-holding in dim light
- Faster lens aperture at wide angle for better bokeh and low light
- Longer flash range enhances indoor usability
- Lightweight and slightly smaller form factor favors portability
- Marginally better video resolution for casual users
- Uses widely available Memory Stick Duo cards
Cons:
- No weather sealing or rugged features
- Modest zoom range compared to Pentax
- No RAW shooting or manual exposure controls
- Slower shutter max aperture at telephoto end
- Lacks macro focus ability that Pentax excels in
Budget-conscious users prioritizing stabilized, sharp images indoors, natural bokeh, or lightweight cameras should lean toward the Sony W220 - especially when getting it for closer to $160.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations: Which Should You Pick?
Both the Pentax Optio W80 and Sony Cyber-shot W220 represent solid examples of small sensor compact cameras from the late 2000s, each geared toward casual shooters seeking a no-fuss point-and-shoot experience.
-
For Outdoors & Macro Fanatics: If occasional outdoor adventures, splash resistance, and close-up shooting are top priorities - and you don't mind a lack of stabilization - go with the Pentax W80.
-
For Low-Light & Travel Simplicity: If you want steadier handheld shots indoors, a lighter carry, and slightly better video abilities, the Sony W220 is a better choice.
-
For Budget Buyers: Sony W220’s lower price and stabilization make it the most practical value buy.
Neither will satisfy professional users longing for manual control, fast autofocus, or RAW image quality - modern mirrorless or DSLR systems would serve them better there.
In Closing
When testing cameras like these, I always emphasize real-world handling and performance over spec sheets alone. Years in camera testing show me that a good compact is about reliable autofocus, decent sharpness, manageable noise, and user-friendly ergonomics - not just pixel counts.
Whether you’re a cheapskate hunting a fun secondary camera or a beginner needing point-and-shoot ease, the Pentax Optio W80 and Sony Cyber-shot W220 both have their niches. Choose wisely, and capture your moments with confidence.
Happy shooting!
Pentax W80 vs Sony W220 Specifications
Pentax Optio W80 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Pentax | Sony |
Model type | Pentax Optio W80 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2009-06-25 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 30-120mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-7.1 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.90 m | 7.10 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Flash On, Slow Syncro, Red-eye, Flash Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (8 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 156 grams (0.34 lb) | 147 grams (0.32 lb) |
Dimensions | 100 x 56 x 25mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | D-LI78 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $250 | $160 |