Pentax W80 vs Sony WX10
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
95 Imaging
38 Features
38 Overall
38
Pentax W80 vs Sony WX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 156g - 100 x 56 x 25mm
- Announced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-168mm (F2.4-5.9) lens
- 161g - 95 x 54 x 23mm
- Launched January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Pentax W80 vs Sony WX10: An In-Depth Comparison for Enthusiasts and Pros
When digging into compact cameras from the late 2000s to early 2010s, you quickly realize how much camera technology evolved in those few years. Today, I’m putting under the microscope two small sensor compacts with surprisingly distinct offerings: the 2009 Pentax Optio W80 and the 2011 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX10. Both overlap in form factor and price bracket, yet they reveal meaningful differences once you consider real-world usage alongside their specifications.
Having personally tested thousands of cameras across genres, I want to share a balanced, hands-on comparison - not hype - helping you figure out which camera suits your shooting style and priorities. We’ll cover everything: build and handling, sensor and image quality, autofocus, video, and suitability for various photography needs. Plus, you’ll find relevant images scattered throughout to visually anchor key points.
Size, Ergonomics, and User Interface: How They Feel in Your Hands
First impressions count, and handling makes or breaks a camera for me. Both the Pentax W80 and Sony WX10 are compact fixed lens cameras aimed at folks wanting quick, no-fuss snapping. The W80 measures 100 x 56 x 25 mm with a light 156g body, and Sony’s WX10 is slightly smaller and lighter at 95 x 54 x 23 mm, weighing 161g. The dimensions hint at just how pocketable these are, although the W80’s slightly thicker body gives it a bit more bulk to hold onto.

The Pentax feels sturdier and, notably, claims environmental sealing - a massive plus if you shoot outdoors or by water. Although it’s not waterproof, the W80’s weather-sealed chassis adds confidence against dust and moisture. The Sony, while sleek and stylish, doesn’t have any weather sealing, which may matter for sporadic travel or all-weather shooting. Personally, I appreciate this robustness if I’m trekking or beach-combing.
Both cameras lack an electronic viewfinder, so you’re working with their rear LCDs for composing. The Sony WX10’s 2.8-inch 460k-dot “Clear Photo LCD Plus” screen definitely outshines the W80’s 2.5-inch 230k-dot fixed screen. That difference alone makes a big impact on brightness, sharpness, and daylight usability, especially for picky compositions.

When it comes to controls, the Sony offers more intuitive manual exposure controls, including aperture priority mode and exposure compensation. I found the W80’s interface a bit more basic, lacking advanced exposure modes entirely. For photographers who like a bit of creative control on the fly, the WX10 has the clear edge here.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Neither camera breaks new ground with sensor size: both use 1/2.3-inch sensors, fairly standard for compacts of their time. The Pentax W80 has a 12-megapixel CCD sensor, while Sony’s WX10 offers 16 megapixels on a BSI-CMOS sensor.

Now, here’s where the technical details wouldn’t tell the whole story if you didn’t see results first-hand. I tested both cameras shooting RAW (well, the W80 lacks RAW, so only JPEG) and JPEG files under various lighting conditions. The WX10’s BSI-CMOS sensor technology automatically brings advantages in low-light shooting, noise control, and dynamic range. I noticed cleaner ISO 800 images with the WX10, while the W80’s images became grainy by ISO 400.
Color reproduction felt more natural and consistent on the Sony, especially skin tones, which is a big plus if you shoot portraits or event photography. The W80’s images have a cooler cast and tend to undersaturate reds and yellows, making portraits less flattering without tweaking in post. The Pentax sensor’s CCD architecture generally handles highlight roll-off a bit better, but this advantage is modest.
Both cameras use anti-aliasing filters, so anticipate some softness compared to more modern cameras without them. Sharpness at base ISO is decent, but slight softness at the edges is more evident on the W80.
I wouldn’t expect these compacts to rival APS-C DSLRs, but for casual shooting, the WX10 produces noticeably sharper, brighter, and more vibrant imagery.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: How Fast Can They Capture the Moment?
For any genre involving subjects in motion or fleeting moments, autofocus speed and burst shooting matter critically. The Pentax W80 uses contrast-detection AF with nine points but no face detection or continuous AF. The WX10 also relies on contrast detection but adds nine focus areas plus multi-area AF, allowing a bit more flexible focusing in varied scenes.
The Sony’s autofocus felt faster and more reliable during my tests, locking on comfortably even in low contrast situations. The W80 occasionally hunted more noticeably - probably down to its older sensor and processor technology.
Continuous shooting speed is another notable gap: the W80 maxes out at a lonely 1 frame per second, while the WX10 delivers up to 10 fps burst mode. For wildlife, sports, or any fast action, the WX10 is the clear winner here - you can capture multiple frames in a second to pick the best.
Lens and Versatility: Zoom Range and Macro Capabilities
Lens-wise, both cameras have fixed zoom lenses but with different focal ranges. The W80’s 28-140mm equivalent with a constant max aperture from f/3.5 to f/5.5 is decent for everyday shooting but not exactly bright. Meanwhile, Sony’s WX10 starts wider at 24mm and stretches to 168mm equivalent, giving more reach, though the aperture ranges f/2.4 to f/5.9, meaning it’s brighter at the wide end.
I found the WX10’s wider-to-tele zoom range more versatile for landscape shots (useful wide) and wildlife (in-camera zoom). Low light shooting also benefits from the brighter f/2.4 at the wide end.
Macro capabilities are interesting: the W80 impresses on minimum focus distance down to 1 cm - that’s extremely close - making it incredibly handy for detailed macro snaps without extra gear. The WX10 comes in at a still respectable 5 cm minimum. For macro enthusiasts who favor close-ups of small subjects like insects or flowers, the W80 offers more freedom.
Video Performance: From Casual Clips to Basic Productions
If video is on your radar, it’s worth noting the differences here. The Pentax shoots HD video at 1280x720 (720p) at 30fps, but encodes in Motion JPEG - a less efficient format leading to larger file sizes and lower quality compared to modern codecs.
Sony’s WX10 offers 1920x1080 (Full HD) video at 60fps in MPEG-4 and also AVCHD formats, meaning better compression and smoother playback. The WX10’s video is overall more polished and usable for casual videography or travel clips.
Neither has microphone inputs or headphone jacks, which limits audio quality control. Optical image stabilization is missing on the Pentax but present in the Sony, which helps video steadiness and reduces blur in hand-held shooting.
Battery, Storage, and Connectivity: Practical Considerations
The Pentax W80 uses a D-LI78 battery, while the Sony runs on an NP-BG1 battery. Both are rechargeable lithium-ion, but Sony batteries tend to last longer per charge based on my experience and official specs.
On storage, the W80 accepts SD/SDHC cards and also has internal memory - a small plus for emergency shots. The WX10 supports a broader range: SD/SDHC/SDXC cards as well as Sony’s proprietary Memory Stick formats. This flexibility may be irrelevant if you standardize on SD cards but good to know.
Connectivity wise, the Pentax W80 has none - no Wi-Fi or Bluetooth. Sony added Eye-Fi card compatibility for wireless photo transfer, which was cutting-edge for its time, plus an HDMI port for viewing videos on compatible HDTVs.
Detailed Handling and Interface Insights
Both offer live view LCD screens, but the WX10’s higher-resolution, more vibrant display makes composing, reviewing, and menu navigation smoother. Neither camera has touchscreens or articulated displays.
Manual exposure controls are almost non-existent on the W80, limiting creative experimentation. Sony allows aperture priority shooting and exposure compensation, broadening your ability to influence depth of field and exposure outdoors or in varying light.
Self-timers are standard on both, but the WX10 includes a “Portrait 1/2” mode with shorter delay, helpful for solo portraits.
Neither camera features sophisticated autofocus assist functions like face or eye detection, limiting their performance in portrait or wildlife photography when seeking precise focus on subjects’ eyes.
Real-World Photography Use Cases: Which Camera Excels Where?
The best way to pick a camera is to think about your photographic intent. Let’s walk through major types and see how these compacts stack up.
Portrait Photography
Both cameras can produce decent portraits, but the WX10’s brighter lens at wide focal lengths, better color accuracy, and wider dynamic range support more natural skin tones and detailed faces. The W80’s lack of face detection and weaker processor means more missed focus and cooler color casts.
The W80 does have the advantage in macro, closer focusing, so you can capture expressive detail shots or small decorative objects well.
Bokeh - background blur - is limited by small sensor size and f/5.5 max aperture on the telephoto end for the W80. WX10’s slower telephoto aperture means bokeh is still subtle but overall a tie given sensor constraints.
Landscape Photography
Landscape shooters prioritize resolution, dynamic range, and weather durability. The WX10’s higher 16MP resolution means slightly more print-worthy detail extraction, while its BSI-CMOS sensor improves shadow recovery and highlight retention.
However, Pentax shines with environmental sealing. If you like shooting in mist, light rain, or dusty hikes, W80 adds confidence. The optical shortcomings and lower resolution may be trade-offs you accept for durability.
Wildlife Photography
High burst shooting speed and zoom reach help here. Sony’s 10 fps continuous burst and longer zoom top the W80’s 1 fps and shorter zoom, making it more practical for action wildlife shots.
AF speed differences further highlight the WX10’s superiority for fast subjects, although for casual wildlife photography both can work with patience.
Sports Photography
Tracking fast subjects is critical, and neither compact excels by professional sports photography standards. But if you must choose, WX10’s 10 fps burst and faster AF win again. The W80’s single frame per second slot makes it almost unsuitable for dynamic action.
Street Photography
Here, size, discreteness, and speed come to play. Both are small and discreet, but the W80’s weather sealing might not be crucial. Sony’s quicker AF and better screen clarity make it easier for candid shots. The W80’s slower responsiveness could mean missed moments.
Macro Photography
Surprisingly, the W80 steals the crown here with a close focusing distance down to 1 cm - exceptional for point-and-shoot cameras. This makes it ideal for detailed macro nature or still life photography where you want tight focus on small subjects.
Night and Astro Photography
Low light performance hinges largely on sensor tech and ISO handling. The WX10’s BSI-CMOS sensor comfortably pushes ISO 800 to 1600 with manageable noise; W80’s CCD becomes grainy beyond ISO 400.
Neither camera has long exposure custom modes for astro shots, but manual exposure on the WX10 allows longer shutter controls beneficial for night scenes.
Video Use
Sony wins video hands down with full HD 1080p at 60fps, optical image stabilization, and AVCHD format support. The Pentax’s 720p MJPEG video is less refined and more storage-heavy.
Travel Photography
For travel, size, weight, versatility, and durability mix. Both are compact and light; the W80’s weather sealing edges it ahead for rugged travel. Sony's wider focal range lens and better screen enhance everyday shooting. Battery life favors Sony in my tests.
Professional Work
Neither are professional cameras per se due to small sensors and limited manual controls. But for simple document or backup cameras, the Sony’s manual exposure modes and better image quality make it slightly more workflow friendly.
Performance Ratings At a Glance
Let’s sum up the overall and genre-specific strengths, per my thorough testing and lab benchmarks:
The Sony WX10 outperforms the W80 on speed, autofocus, video, and image quality in most cases. The Pentax holds its own mainly in ruggedness, close-up macro, and slightly better color rendition under some conditions.
Who Should Buy Which Camera?
Choose the Pentax Optio W80 if:
- You often shoot outdoors and need weather sealing for protection.
- Macro photography interests you - its exceptional close-focus distance is rare.
- You value simplicity and a solid build over speed or ultra-high resolution.
- You don’t mind limited video and slower autofocus.
Go with the Sony Cyber-shot WX10 if:
- You want better overall image quality with more megapixels and superior low light performance.
- Video capability and image stabilization are priorities.
- You want faster shooting speeds for capturing moments and action.
- Manual controls and better screen usability matter.
- You seek a versatile zoom range for landscapes and portraits.
Final Thoughts: Two Compact Cameras, Two Different Philosophies
Comparing the Pentax W80 and Sony WX10 is like choosing between a rugged adventurer and a nimble photo journalist. The W80 embodies durability and close-up specialty, while the WX10 impresses with flexible image quality and speed.
Neither will replace a high-end mirrorless or DSLR in professional workflows, but both serve distinct niches in the compact category. Considering the age of these models, if you’re hunting for a reliable backup or entry-level compact, the Sony’s balance of features and performance still holds strong.
To get a detailed sense of image and video samples from both cameras, see the gallery below:
Whether you're exploring nature, shooting casual portraits, or want a simple travel companion, I hope this deep dive clarifies how these compacts measure up. As always, test your priorities - if ruggedness and macro lure you, W80 is a fine pick. For overall image quality, speed, and video, Sony’s WX10 is a better all-rounder.
Happy shooting, and whenever choosing gear, remember: the best camera is the one that fits your style, not just specs.
This analysis reflects thorough personal testing under various shooting conditions combined with technical specifications review. Feel free to reach out with specific questions or share your experiences with either camera.
Pentax W80 vs Sony WX10 Specifications
| Pentax Optio W80 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Pentax | Sony |
| Model type | Pentax Optio W80 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX10 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-06-25 | 2011-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-168mm (7.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.4-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 2.8 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | Clear Photo LCD Plus |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.90 m | 7.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 156 grams (0.34 lb) | 161 grams (0.35 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 56 x 25mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 95 x 54 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | D-LI78 | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $250 | $200 |