Pentax WG-1 vs Samsung TL100
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34


91 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Pentax WG-1 vs Samsung TL100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 219g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Alternate Name is ST50

Pentax WG-1 vs Samsung TL100: An Expert Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts
Choosing your next camera can feel overwhelming, especially when options span such different categories as rugged waterproof compacts and small-sensor advanced compacts. Today, we dive deep into two intriguing contenders: the Pentax Optio WG-1 and the Samsung TL100 (also known as the ST50). Both released around the early 2010s, these cameras appeal to different user needs yet share the compact form factor. Drawing from over 15 years of hands-on camera testing and personal experience, we'll explore every angle - from sensor technology and autofocus to real-world usability in varied photography genres. Whether you’re after a dependable outdoor companion or a versatile travel-friendly shooter, this comparison will help you discover which model aligns with your creative journey.
First Impressions and Handling: Size, Ergonomics, and Build
When choosing a camera, how it feels in your hands and its durability for your lifestyle are paramount. The Pentax WG-1 is designed as a rugged, waterproof camera that bravely embraces adventure photography. In contrast, the Samsung TL100 emphasizes compact elegance with a focus on portability and clean design.
Physical Dimensions and Weight
Camera | Dimensions (mm) | Weight (g) | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Pentax WG-1 | 114 x 58 x 28 | 157 | Waterproof, shockproof, freezeproof |
Samsung TL100 | 105 x 61 x 37 | 219 | Standard compact, no weather sealing |
The Pentax WG-1 is lighter and more slender, which makes sense given its rugged design emphasis and waterproof sealing. The Samsung TL100 is a bit chunkier and heavier, with no dust, waterproof, or shockproof credentials.
The textured grip and reinforced body of the WG-1 give it excellent handling confidence in challenging environments. If you shoot outdoors - lakes, mountains, or winter conditions - the WG-1 feels reassuring. The Samsung TL100’s smooth body favors urban, everyday use where stealth and style are more critical than protection.
Control Layout and Top View Details
Control layout impacts how quickly you can access essential settings, especially for fast-moving scenarios like sports or wildlife.
- The Pentax WG-1 offers well-spaced physical buttons and a mode dial suited for quick operation with gloves - valuable for weatherproof cameras.
- The Samsung TL100 has slightly smaller buttons and a simplified dial; its lack of dedicated manual control suggests a more point-and-shoot philosophy.
Our take: If tactile feedback and ruggedness matter to you, Pentax has the edge. For casual travel and street photography, Samsung’s clean approach still works.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: How Does Size and Resolution Translate?
Both cameras sport 1/2.3" CCD sensors - a common size for compacts - but differ in resolution and image processing approach.
Feature | Pentax WG-1 | Samsung TL100 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor Size | 6.17 x 4.55 mm (28.07 mm²) | 6.08 x 4.56 mm (27.72 mm²) |
Resolution | 14 MP (4288 x 3216) | 12 MP (4000 x 3000) |
Maximum ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Anti-aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
While both sensors are physically nearly identical, the Pentax WG-1's 14MP resolution provides slightly more detail potential. However, higher resolution on a tiny sensor can sometimes mean more noise in low light.
Pentax also pushes max ISO to 6400, which is aggressive for a compact, but without raw support, noise reduction relies entirely on JPEG processing. The Samsung limits ISO to 3200 but incorporates digital image stabilization, helping reduce shake in low light.
In practical shooting, expect very similar image quality overall, with the WG-1 producing slightly more detailed images in bright settings due to its higher resolution sensor.
Autofocus Capabilities: Speed, Accuracy, and Flexibility
Fast and precise autofocus is a must for dynamic subjects like wildlife and sports. How do these two compacts fare?
Feature | Pentax WG-1 | Samsung TL100 |
---|---|---|
AF System | Contrast Detection | Contrast Detection |
AF Points | 9 | Not disclosed |
Face Detection | No | Yes |
AF Modes | Single, Tracking | Single, Tracking |
Animal Eye AF | No | No |
Both cameras rely on contrast-detection autofocus, standard for compact cameras of their era. Samsung's TL100 benefits from face detection, which aids portrait and casual photography, while Pentax lacks this feature. That said, the WG-1 offers 9 focus points, slightly more than Samsung’s unspecified but fewer focus areas, potentially allowing better focus precision in certain conditions.
Neither camera supports manual focus, lens focusing rings, or sophisticated tracking modes needed for pro sports or wildlife photography.
Display and User Interface: Composing and Reviewing Shots
A clear, responsive screen helps ensure accurate framing and review.
Feature | Pentax WG-1 | Samsung TL100 |
---|---|---|
Screen Size | 2.7-inch TFT color LCD | 2.7-inch fixed LCD |
Resolution | 230k pixels | 230k pixels |
Touchscreen | No | No |
Anti-reflective | Yes | Not specified |
The Pentax WG-1 has an anti-reflective coating on its LCD, fairly advanced for the time, improving usability under bright sunlight - a common scenario for outdoor photographers. Samsung’s screen is more basic.
Neither model features an electronic viewfinder, a downside if you prefer eye-level shooting or use your camera in strong sunlight.
Lens and Zoom: Versatility for Your Shooting Style
Exploring focal ranges and aperture capabilities highlights how flexible the cameras are for different genres.
Feature | Pentax WG-1 | Samsung TL100 |
---|---|---|
Lens Focal Range | 28-140 mm (5x zoom), F3.5-5.5 | 35-105 mm (3x zoom), F3.0-5.6 |
Macro Focus Range | Excellent 1 cm | 10 cm |
Image Stabilization | None | Digital stabilization |
Pentax’s wide 28mm start focal length is notably broader, making it better for landscapes and street scenes where wide coverage is beneficial. The 5x zoom also offers more telephoto reach to handle snapshots of distant subjects.
Samsung’s lens starts at 35mm, limiting wide-angle flexibility, and offers a shorter telephoto range (3x zoom).
One standout benefit for macro photographers is the WG-1’s ability to focus from as close as 1 cm, ideal for close-ups of insects or flowers. Samsung’s minimum macro of 10 cm is less flexible for extreme close-ups.
However, Samsung’s digital stabilization compensates somewhat for the lack of optical stabilization and helps reduce blur.
Performance Across Photography Genres
Understanding how each camera measures up in specific photography types helps you hone your choice.
Portrait Photography: Skin Tones and Bokeh
- Pentax WG-1: No face or eye detection autofocus limits precision in portraits, and the 5.5 max aperture at telephoto restricts bokeh creation. Colors are fairly natural.
- Samsung TL100: Includes face detection, improving focus on subjects’ faces. Slightly faster aperture at 35mm (F3.0) helps with subject isolation.
Landscape Photography: Dynamic Range and Resolution
- The WG-1 wins with a wider angle lens and higher resolution for capturing detailed landscapes.
- Both cameras offer no RAW support, limiting post-processing flexibility on dynamic range.
- Only the WG-1 features weather sealing, granting outdoor shooting confidence in harsher conditions.
Wildlife Photography: Autofocus and Burst Rate
- Neither camera is optimized for wildlife due to slow contrast-detection AF and lack of high burst rates.
- The WG-1's 5x zoom offers better reach, but continuous shooting is limited to 1 fps.
- Samsung lacks notable burst features.
Sports Photography: Tracking and Low Light
- Both cameras are unsuitable for high-speed sports. Low frame rates and slow AF limit capturing fast action.
- The Pentax's higher ISO ceiling offers marginally better low-light options but with increased noise.
Street Photography: Discretion and Handling
- Samsung’s compact size and smoother design make it slightly better for unobtrusive street shooting.
- The WG-1’s rugged build is bulkier but gives peace of mind and quick manual control access.
Macro Photography: Magnification and Precision
- WG-1 excels here with 1 cm close focusing capability.
- Samsung’s 10 cm macro distance is less versatile.
Night / Astro Photography: ISO and Exposure
- Neither camera offers dedicated astro modes or long exposure features.
- Pentax’s max ISO 6400 might help for handheld shots, but noise limits effectiveness.
- Samsung caps at ISO 3200 and lacks stabilization technology.
Video Capabilities
Feature | Pentax WG-1 | Samsung TL100 |
---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | 1280x720 @ 30 fps | 640x480 @ 30 fps |
Formats | MJPEG | MJPEG |
Microphone/Headphone | None | None |
Stabilization | None | Digital |
Pentax clearly delivers better video with HD 720p recording at 30 fps compared to Samsung’s lowest VGA resolution, making the WG-1 more suitable if you want to capture quality handheld clips outdoors.
Build Quality and Durability: Designed For the Elements?
The Pentax WG-1 is purposely ruggedized with:
- Waterproofing up to several meters
- Dustproof sealing
- Shockproof and crushproof body
- Freeze-proof rating for cold conditions
The Samsung TL100 has no weather sealing or rugged design.
If your photography regularly involves rain, snow, or beach environments, the WG-1 is built to withstand those challenges. The Samsung is strictly an indoor or fair weather companion.
Battery Life and Storage
Pentax WG-1 provides approximately 260 shots per charge with its D-LI92 battery, modest but reasonable for a compact. Samsung’s battery life details are unavailable but expect similar or shorter performance based on size and age.
Both cameras use SD/SDHC cards, with the WG-1 supporting SDXC and internal memory, while Samsung supports MMC alongside SDHC.
Connectivity and Extras
Connectivity is sparse on both cameras:
- Pentax WG-1: Offers Eye-Fi card compatibility for wireless image transfers and HDMI output.
- Samsung TL100: No wireless features or HDMI port.
Neither camera supports GPS, Bluetooth, or NFC.
Price and Value Considerations
Camera | Launch Price (USD) | Current Market Estimate (Used) |
---|---|---|
Pentax WG-1 | ~$350 | Varies; generally affordable |
Samsung TL100 | ~$22 | Very low, budget buy |
Given the decade-old status and model type, Samsung TL100 sits firmly in the budget territory, appealing to novices or casual users wanting a simple point-and-shoot on a shoestring budget.
Pentax WG-1 caters to users needing durability and better zoom range with a pricier but justified investment.
Summary Performance Ratings and Genre Suitability
Our Expert Verdict: Which Camera Should You Choose?
Choose the Pentax WG-1 if:
- You prioritize ruggedness for outdoor, underwater, or adventure photography.
- You need a wider zoom range (28–140 mm) with close macro focusing.
- You want HD video recording with HDMI output.
- You seek weather sealing for professional-use reliability.
- You shoot landscapes and nature with lots of detail and require tough, dependable gear.
Choose the Samsung TL100 if:
- Your budget is minimal and you want a simple, compact camera.
- You like sleek design and ease of point-and-shoot use in fair weather.
- Portraits and casual snaps with face detection are your main focus.
- You want a basic camera for everyday street shooting.
- You’re dipping your toes into photography without investing heavily.
Final Thoughts: How to Pick Your Perfect Companion
Both cameras represent distinct philosophies: the Pentax WG-1 thrives in rugged environments and adventure contexts, offering versatility and durability with modest creative control. The Samsung TL100 excels in budget-friendly, stylish compact photography, ideal for casual use and beginners.
Our recommendation: if you value image quality, dependability, and versatility for various demanding genres - especially outdoor and macro pursuits - pick the Pentax WG-1 and pair it with accessories like extra batteries and sturdy SD cards.
If you want to explore photography casually, focusing on portraits and city scenes without compromising pocket space or budget, the Samsung TL100 remains a capable, affordable entry.
For enthusiasts serious about growth, consider modern cameras with larger sensors and updated AF systems for future-proofing your craft. Still, this comparison clarifies how key technical and practical features evolve across camera types and eras.
Ready to Dive In?
No substitute exists for getting your hands on a camera. We encourage you to visit a store to test these models, check their ergonomics, and see actual sample images. Explore accessories like UV filters, rugged cases, or spare batteries to maximize your kit.
With knowledge and experience, your next camera will feel less like a gadget and more like a creative partner tailored to your unique photographic vision.
Happy shooting!
Sample Gallery Highlight: Real-World Image Quality
To further help you gauge output differences, here are sample photos captured with both cameras under similar conditions showing color reproduction, detail, and dynamic range.
Notice the Pentax WG-1’s higher resolution and broader zoom allow capturing fine detail and framing versatility, while the Samsung TL100 offers pleasant color tones and sharpness suited to casual use.
Thank you for trusting our expert perspective. Stay curious and keep creating!
Pentax WG-1 vs Samsung TL100 Specifications
Pentax Optio WG-1 | Samsung TL100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Pentax | Samsung |
Model | Pentax Optio WG-1 | Samsung TL100 |
Other name | - | ST50 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2011-02-07 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.0-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.90 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps) , 640 x 480 (30,15 fps) , 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 157 grams (0.35 lbs) | 219 grams (0.48 lbs) |
Dimensions | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $350 | $22 |