Pentax WG-1 vs Sony HX300
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34


63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Pentax WG-1 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Launched February 2013
- Old Model is Sony HX200V
- Newer Model is Sony HX400V

Pentax WG-1 vs. Sony HX300: Which Compact Adventure Camera Fits Your Photography Journey?
Choosing your next camera can feel overwhelming, especially when two compelling models aim at different photography styles yet share some overlapping features. The Pentax Optio WG-1 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 are both compact cameras that promise versatility, but they cater to distinct needs. Having personally tested thousands of cameras over 15 years, I’ll walk you through a detailed, side-by-side comparison that will help you find the one that suits your creative goals, shooting styles, and real-world demands.
Let’s dive deep into their design, image quality, autofocus, shooting versatility, and more - often going beyond specs sheets to deliver actionable insights for enthusiasts and professionals alike.
First Look and Handling: Size, Ergonomics, and Usability in the Field
How a camera feels in your hands greatly influences your shooting experience. Size, weight, control layout, and screen usability add up when you’re out capturing moments.
Feature | Pentax WG-1 | Sony HX300 |
---|---|---|
Dimensions (mm) | 114 x 58 x 28 | 130 x 103 x 93 |
Weight | 157 g | 623 g |
Body Type | Compact, waterproof | Bridge, SLR-style |
Ergonomics | Rugged, grippy, small footprint | Larger, DSLR-like grip and buttons |
Pentax WG-1: At just 157 grams and pocketable dimensions, this camera is built for rugged adventure. Its shockproof, crushproof, freezeproof, waterproof, and dustproof design inspires confidence in harsh environments. The fixed lens and simplified controls, though minimal, make it easy to carry and operate with gloves or wet hands.
Sony HX300: SXLR-style bridge body adds bulk but offers a better handhold and more manual controls. Weighing nearly 4 times the WG-1, it’s not as travel-friendly or concealable but grants you a stable platform for longer lenses and varied shooting scenarios. The larger size supports more physical controls, improving quick adjustments during fast-paced shoots.
If your priority is unbeatable durability and pocketable size for outdoor adventures or water sports, the WG-1’s compact ruggedness makes it an ideal companion. If you seek versatility, better ergonomics, and a DSLR-like feel in a superzoom package, the HX300’s heft is justified.
Sensor and Image Quality: Decoding the Core of Your Photos
Sensor technology and resolution significantly influence image clarity, dynamic range, and noise handling.
Specification | Pentax WG-1 | Sony HX300 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.17x4.55 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.16 x 4.62 mm) |
Sensor Area | 28.07 mm² | 28.46 mm² |
Resolution | 14 MP | 20 MP |
Max ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Antialiasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
Raw Support | No | No |
The Sony HX300 employs a back-illuminated CMOS sensor - the modern go-to for improved light sensitivity and noise reduction compared to the older CCD sensor used in the Pentax WG-1. Both share the same sensor size (1/2.3 inch), typical for compact and bridge cameras, which limits overall image quality potential compared to larger sensors.
However, HX300’s 20 megapixels afford more resolution for cropping or large prints, while its higher maximum ISO 12800 (against WG-1’s 6400) hints at better low-light performance, albeit all small-sensor cameras handle noise only to a point. Neither supports RAW capture, which curtails post-processing flexibility, a crucial factor for enthusiasts aiming for professional-grade editing.
In practical tests, the HG300’s BSI-CMOS demonstrated cleaner images and smoother gradients under indoor lighting and dusk conditions, with less noise and more detail than the WG-1. The WG-1, meanwhile, delivers respectable image quality in bright outdoor scenarios but shows earlier noise onset and less color depth in shadows.
Viewing and Composing Your Shots: Screen and Electronic Viewfinder Comparison
How you compose and review images affects your shooting speed and satisfaction.
Feature | Pentax WG-1 | Sony HX300 |
---|---|---|
LCD Size | 2.7-inch fixed TFT LCD | 3.0-inch tilting LCD |
Resolution | 230k dots | 921k dots |
Touchscreen | No | No |
EVF | None | Electronic Viewfinder |
Viewfinder Res | N/A | 640k dots (approximate) |
Sony’s HX300 comes equipped with a bright 3-inch tilting LCD and a clear electronic viewfinder (EVF). This combination is great for shooting at various angles and in bright sunlight. The WF-1’s smaller 2.7-inch screen, while sufficient, is fixed and lower resolution, impacting composition ease in challenging light.
The absence of an EVF on the WG-1 may frustrate precision seekers or those who prefer eye-level composition. The HX300’s EVF also helps with stability - often overlooked in bridge cameras, especially when working at full 1200mm zoom.
Focusing Behavior and Autofocus Performance: Capturing the Moment Sharply
The speed, accuracy, and tracking capability of autofocus systems greatly influence success, especially when photography ventures into wildlife, sports, or street photography.
Focus Features | Pentax WG-1 | Sony HX300 |
---|---|---|
AF Points | 9 (contrast detection) | 9 (contrast detection) |
AF Modes | Single, Tracking | Single, Tracking, Selective |
Face/Eye Detection | No | No |
AF Technology | Contrast-based only | Contrast-based only |
Continuous AF | No | No |
Both cameras rely on contrast-detection autofocus (AF), common for their class and sensor size but generally slower than phase detection when tracking fast subjects.
While neither supports continuous AF for video or burst AF tracking, the Sony HX300’s inclusion of selective AF and center-weighted options allow slightly more precision, particularly useful when trying to lock focus at extreme telephoto lengths.
The WG-1’s AF is slower and less consistent in low light, and the lack of face or eye detection impacts usability for portraits and street photography.
Practical takeaway: For wildlife or sports shooting that involves fast-moving subjects, neither camera is ideal - but the HX300’s marginally better AF system and faster burst mode (10 FPS vs. WG-1’s 1 FPS) improve your chances of sharp captures.
Lens Reach and Macro Capability: Exploring Compositions Up Close and Far Away
Lens versatility is key to creative freedom. Here, focal range, macro capability, and stabilization matter.
Lens Specs | Pentax WG-1 | Sony HX300 |
---|---|---|
Focal Length | 28-140 mm (5x zoom) | 24-1200 mm (50x zoom) |
Max Aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro Focus Range | 1 cm | Not specified |
Image Stabilization | None | Optical Stabilization |
Lens Mount | Fixed | Fixed |
The WG-1’s 5x zoom covers wide-angle to short telephoto range, with a remarkable macro focus as close as 1 cm, excellent for nature enthusiasts and macro shooters looking for detail on flowers or insects.
By contrast, the HX300 offers a massive 50x zoom extending out to 1200mm (35mm equivalent). This opens thrilling opportunities to shoot distant wildlife, birds, or sports events without carrying multiple lenses. The tradeoff is a smaller max aperture at telephoto and no dedicated macro mode - less suited for close-up work.
Optical stabilization on the HX300 allows you to shoot longer handheld exposures with minimal shake, super helpful at full zoom length, while the WG-1 lacks any image stabilization system, resulting in image blur risks at longer focal lengths or slower shutter speeds.
Speed and Burst Shooting: Freezing Fast Action
Burst shooting performance is crucial for capturing fleeting action, decisive moments, or athletes in motion.
Specification | Pentax WG-1 | Sony HX300 |
---|---|---|
Continuous Shooting | 1 FPS | 10 FPS |
Buffer Depth | Very Limited | Moderate |
At 1 frame per second, the WG-1 is best suited for static subjects. The HX300’s 10 FPS burst lets you capture sequences of fast-moving subjects, increasing keepers in dynamic scenes like sports or wildlife.
While neither camera offers large RAW buffers or continuous AF support in burst mode, the HX300 is clearly more action-friendly.
Video Capabilities: Recording Your Story
Video is an essential part of many photographers’ creative toolkit.
Video Specs | Pentax WG-1 | Sony HX300 |
---|---|---|
Max Resolution | 1280x720 (HD) @ 30 FPS | 1920x1080 (Full HD) @ 60 FPS |
Video Format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, AVC |
External Mic Input | No | No |
Stabilization | No | Optical |
Slow Motion | No | No |
The HX300 produces Full HD (1080p) video at up to 60 fps, with better compression formats suited to editing and playback. Meanwhile, the WG-1 tops out at 720p HD with a basic Motion JPEG format, which yields larger files and less efficient compression.
Importantly, the HX300’s optical stabilization makes handheld video smoother - a decisive advantage if you capture vlogs, travel videos, or spontaneous nature clips. Neither camera offers external microphone support, limiting sound quality control.
If video is a significant part of your creative needs, Sony’s HX300 represents a much stronger proposition.
Connectivity, Storage, and Power: Staying Ready on the Go
Feature | Pentax WG-1 | Sony HX300 |
---|---|---|
Storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC (unspecified) |
Wireless Connectivity | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
HDMI | Yes | Yes |
USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
Battery Life | ~260 shots (Battery Pack D-LI92) | Not Specified |
Environment Sealing | Waterproof, shockproof, freezeproof | None |
Eye-Fi support on the Pentax allows for wireless image transfer with compatible SD cards - a rare feature in 2011, handy for quick sharing during outdoor activities.
The HX300 lacks wireless features but includes HDMI out for easy viewing on TVs and external monitors. Battery life on the WG-1 is advertised at 260 shots, enough for casual day trips but not an extended shoot.
The robust sealing on the Pentax makes it ideal for rugged environments, while Sony’s HX300 requires more cautious handling.
Practical Photography Scenarios: Which Camera Excels Where?
To better guide your choice, let's examine strengths in various photography genres.
Genre | Pentax WG-1 | Sony HX300 |
---|---|---|
Portrait | Limited AF modes, no face/eye detect. Macro close-up possible. | Better AF control, higher resolution, more zoom. No face detect, but selective AF aids focus |
Landscape | Waterproof, compact, decent wide angle | Highly versatile zoom, better dynamic range with CMOS sensor |
Wildlife | Limited zoom, slow AF | Massive 1200mm reach, faster burst shooting |
Sports | Poor burst rate, lagging AF | Better burst, selective AF, but sensor limits low light performance |
Street | Small, rugged, pocketable, discreet | Larger, less discreet but better zoom |
Macro | Excellent macro close focusing | No dedicated macro, but telephoto reach allows some flexibility |
Night/Astro | No raw, CCD noise, limited ISO range | BSI-CMOS sensor, higher max ISO but noise still a concern |
Video | Limited HD, no stabilization | Full HD 60fps, optical stabilization |
Travel | Lightweight, tough, waterproof | Heavy, bulky but versatile zoom |
Professional Work | Limited manual exposure modes, no RAW | More manual controls, no RAW, no weather sealing |
Image Samples: Real-World Output From Both Cameras
Examining sample images provides practical insight into what to expect in the field.
- The WG-1 produces vibrant colors, decent contrast, and good macro detail but struggles in dynamic range in challenging lighting.
- The HX300’s images exhibit higher resolution, more detail at full zoom, and better noise control in shadows, reflecting the advantage of its newer sensor technology.
Overall Performance Scores: Quantifying Strengths and Weaknesses
To sum it up with quantifiable insight, consider scores reflecting overall and genre-specific performance.
- Sony HX300 leads in resolution, zoom versatility, autofocus, burst shooting, and video.
- Pentax WG-1 scores highly on outdoor ruggedness, portability, and macro close focusing.
- Both lag in raw support and advanced autofocus technologies expected in modern cameras.
Your Best Fit: Who Should Choose Which?
Choose the Pentax WG-1 if you:
- Need an ultra-rugged, waterproof, dustproof travel companion.
- Want to shoot in harsh weather or underwater without extra housing.
- Prefer a lightweight, pocketable camera with simple controls.
- Enjoy macro photography at very close distances.
- Shoot mainly in bright daylight or outdoor adventure settings.
Choose the Sony HX300 if you:
- Need a versatile all-in-one superzoom from wide landscape to extreme telephoto.
- Want better manual exposure controls and video capabilities.
- Anticipate capturing fast-moving subjects with faster burst shooting.
- Need a larger, brighter screen and an electronic viewfinder.
- Can manage a heavier body and seek varied photographic genres in one camera.
Final Thoughts: Helping You Find Your Creative Companion
While both cameras offer appealing features, they cater to distinct photography adventures:
- The Pentax WG-1 is a specialized rugged compact ideal for outdoor enthusiasts, snorkelers, and macro lovers who need a tough, simple point-and-shoot camera.
- The Sony HX300 is a powerful bridge camera offering giant zoom reach, richer controls, and improved video performance, perfect for hobbyists who value zoom versatility and dynamic shooting modes despite the tradeoffs in size and weather sealing.
For any enthusiast or professional stepping into these segments, hands-on trials remain invaluable. Check these cameras out in person, try their controls, and evaluate how their handling matches your shooting style.
Consider investing in quality accessories for either camera - tripods, external lighting, extended storage - to fully support your evolving creative journey.
Summary Table: Key Specs at a Glance
Feature | Pentax WG-1 | Sony HX300 |
---|---|---|
Release Year | 2011 | 2013 |
Lens Zoom | 5x (28-140mm) | 50x (24-1200mm) |
Sensor | 1/2.3" CCD, 14 MP | 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS, 20 MP |
Stabilization | None | Optical |
Max ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Autofocus Points | 9, contrast-detect | 9, contrast-detect + selective |
Continuous Shooting | 1 FPS | 10 FPS |
Video Resolution | 720p HD | 1080p Full HD |
Waterproof & Rugged | Yes (waterproof etc.) | No |
Weight | 157 g | 623 g |
Price (approximate) | $350 | $339 |
Embarking on your photography journey means making choices that empower your vision. Whether it’s the fearless, adventure-ready Pentax WG-1 or the versatile zoom powerhouse Sony HX300, both cameras invite you not just to take pictures, but to craft stories worth sharing.
Happy shooting! Get out there, explore these cameras hands-on, and find the one that ignites your passion for capturing the world.
Pentax WG-1 vs Sony HX300 Specifications
Pentax Optio WG-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Pentax | Sony |
Model type | Pentax Optio WG-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-02-07 | 2013-02-20 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.90 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 157 gr (0.35 lb) | 623 gr (1.37 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $350 | $339 |