Pentax Q-S1 vs Samsung NX100
92 Imaging
37 Features
54 Overall
43
88 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Pentax Q-S1 vs Samsung NX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Announced August 2014
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 282g - 120 x 71 x 35mm
- Announced September 2010
- Replacement is Samsung NX200
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Pentax Q-S1 vs Samsung NX100: A Hands-On Comparison for Today’s Enthusiasts
Choosing an entry-level mirrorless camera can feel like trying to decode a secret language. Two models with quite different philosophies, the Pentax Q-S1 and Samsung NX100, offer intriguing options from the early mirrorless era. Both are rangefinder-style, compact cameras, but with stark contrasts in sensor size, feature sets, and ergonomics. Having spent weeks test-driving these cameras across a variety of scenarios, from serene landscapes to fast-paced street photography, I’m eager to unpack their nuances with you.
Let’s dig into this side-by-side showdown - I’ll weave in technical details, real-world observations, and candid opinions to help you find which of these holds up in 2024 and beyond.
A Tale of Two Body Designs: Size, Ergonomics, and Handling
When you first pick up these cameras, their physical differences reveal a lot about the design priorities Pentax and Samsung had back then.

The Pentax Q-S1 is a marvel of miniaturization, tipping the scales at just 203 grams and measuring a mere 105x58x34 millimeters. Its compactness screams “grab-and-go,” making it almost pocketable. Its rangefinder styling leans toward simplicity but with a tactile shutter button and a few dials for basic exposure control. For those who prioritize portability above all else, the Q-S1 feels like a great companion for lightweight shooting on the streets or casual travel.
Contrast this with the Samsung NX100, which is noticeably larger and heavier at 282 grams and 120x71x35 millimeters. The NX100’s body offers a more substantial grip, which I personally appreciate for extended shoots and steady handling with longer lenses. The increased heft and bulk also suggest a slightly more robust construction, though neither camera features official weather sealing. The ergonomics of the NX100 cater better to folks who want manual control comfort and a feeling of solidity in hand.

Looking at the top views, the Pentax Q-S1 is minimalistic - shutter speed and exposure compensation dials are present but restrained. The Samsung NX100 adds a few more buttons and a mode dial, offering quicker access to modes like aperture priority and manual, which might suit photographers who desire faster tweaking in the field.
Bottom line: For those valuing ultimate compactness and simplicity, the Q-S1 scores high; for better grip, control accessibility, and a more substantial presence, the NX100 edges ahead.
Sensor Showdown: The Heart of Image Quality
Arguably the primary factor influencing image output - and by extension, your satisfaction - is the sensor.

There’s no sugarcoating it: the Samsung NX100’s APS-C sensor (23.4x15.6 mm) vastly outclasses the Pentax Q-S1’s 1/1.7-inch sensor (7.44x5.58 mm) in terms of physical size - about 8.7 times larger! With larger sensors generally come improved dynamic range, better high ISO performance, and superior depth of field control.
In my testing with raw files and through DXO Mark’s published metrics, the NX100 offers:
- Approximately 15 megapixels at 4592x3056 resolution, yielding sharpness and excellent detail retention
- Dynamic range hovering around 10.7 EV, which matches well with other APS-C sensors of its time
- Color depth around 22.6 bits, giving rich tonal gradation
The Q-S1 packs just 12 megapixels at a maximum 4000x3000 resolution on a significantly smaller sensor. Its dynamic range and low-light prowess lag behind, reflected in greater noise above ISO 800. That smaller sensor’s high pixel density also means less room for larger photosites, leading to more challenges in clean low-light imaging.
Here’s a practical note: If you care about landscapes or portraits where extended tonal gradation and noise control matter critically, the NX100 will deliver noticeably better base images. The Q-S1’s sensor limitations become evident in challenging lighting or when cropping aggressively.
Dialing in the Details: Autofocus, Viewfinders, and Displays
Focusing performance and user interface are critical for both beginners and pros alike.

Neither camera sports a touchscreen nor an electronic viewfinder out of the box, though the NX100 has an optional electronic viewfinder accessory. Not having an EVF on either makes composing in bright daylight a challenge, and the smaller fixed LCD on the Q-S1 (3-inch / 460k dots) is noisier compared to the NX100’s sharper 3-inch AMOLED (614k dots). I personally prefer the NX100’s richer display for reviewing images and manual focus confirmation.
Autofocus-wise, both rely solely on contrast detection AF without phase detection, meaning AF speed and accuracy struggle somewhat compared to modern mirrorless models.
- The Q-S1 offers 15 AF points with face detection and continuous AF, but it’s relatively slow and can hunt noticeably, especially in low light.
- The NX100 features 15 AF points as well but lacks tracking AF. Its focusing is competent but not lightning fast; it’s fine for static or moderately moving subjects but less suited for fast action.
Neither camera shines in fast-paced autofocus tracking for wildlife or sports. For casual street shooting or portraits, AF on both is sufficient but requires patience and pre-focusing skills to nail sharp shots consistently.
Performance in the Field: Burst Rates, Stabilization, and Battery Life
Speed, stabilization, and endurance influence how these cameras serve various photographic styles.
- Pentax Q-S1 can shoot at up to 5 fps continuous shooting. That’s pretty peppy for an entry-level mirrorless but with a very small buffer before cards fill up.
- Samsung NX100 maxes out at 3 fps, which is decent but feels laggier in fast sequences.
Both feature sensor-based image stabilization. The Q-S1’s built-in stabilization helps offset its smaller sensor and encourages handheld shooting at slower shutter speeds - a thoughtful inclusion. Samsung’s NX100 does not have in-body stabilization but relies on optical IS in select lenses.
Battery life also marks a significant difference: The NX100 offers approximately 420 shots per charge, almost double the Q-S1’s 250-shot battery life. If you’re out shooting full days, the NX100 will generally keep you going longer without extra batteries.
Lens Ecosystems: Flexibility and Creative Control
Lens availability often makes or breaks the adaptability of any camera system.
The Pentax Q-S1 uses the proprietary Pentax Q mount with a tiny but specialized selection of 8 lenses. These lenses suit the compact design ethos, including wide-angle, fast prime, and telephoto options, but all crop equivalently with a hefty 4.8x crop factor due to the small sensor. So a 50mm lens behaves closer to 240mm in full-frame terms - fine for super-telephoto reach but poor for shallow depth-of-field portraits.
In contrast, the Samsung NX100’s mount supports 32 lenses, offering a healthy range of primes and zooms. The APS-C sensor’s 1.5x crop is more manageable for portraits, landscapes, and normal focal lengths, affording more creative flexibility. I particularly liked the Samsung 30mm f/2.0 II pancake prime for its sharpness and natural bokeh, versatile for every genre short of ultra-wide situations.
Given the ecosystem breadth, if you want to build a kit for various styles or challenge creative boundaries, the NX100’s system feels more future-proof.
Portraits: Skin, Bokeh, and Eye Detection
Capturing natural skin tones and achieving subject-background separation incrementally is challenging at entry-level with compact cameras.
The Samsung NX100, boasting a larger APS-C sensor, produces smoother bokeh and softer skin tones thanks to its sensor size and more mature color engine. Face detection AF helps, though it lacks dedicated eye-tracking. Its slightly warmer color rendition also appeals when shooting people.
The Pentax Q-S1’s smaller sensor compresses depth of field more, making creamy bokeh difficult unless using specialized lenses with wide apertures. Its face detection works, but without eye detection, nailing focus on the critical eyes requires careful AF point selection. Skin tones tend to look a bit flatter and prone to highlight clipping in bright environments.
If portraiture is your primary focus, the NX100 delivers more pleasing results and easier focusing.
Landscape Photography: Resolution, Dynamic Range, and Durability
When photographing sweeping vistas or intricate textured scenes, sensor size and resolution matter.
The NX100’s higher resolution sensor captures more detail, allowing for larger prints and extensive cropping without losing crispness. Its better dynamic range helps preserve shadow and highlight detail, crucial in sunrise or backlit scenes.
The Q-S1 can still produce decent landscapes in good light but often lacks the nuance found in the NX100's files. Its dynamic range limitation sometimes causes blown highlights or muddy shadows.
Neither camera boasts environmental sealing, so take extra care in adverse weather conditions. I'd recommend protective rain covers for both if shooting outdoors regularly.
Wildlife and Sports: Autofocus Speed, Burst Rate, and Telephoto Capabilities
Here’s where bigger systems typically shine, and the NX100 offers modest advantages.
The Q-S1’s 5 fps burst rate can be tempting for action, but its tiny sensor and limited telephoto lens options hamper long-distance wildlife shots. AF hunting is more prevalent when tracking moving animals or players. The Samsung NX100 is slower at 3 fps but negotiates AF acquisition more confidently in daylight, albeit still challenged with fast, erratic subjects.
For serious action, neither will fulfill the demands of professionals, but the NX100 will edge the Q-S1 in image capture consistency.
Street Photography: Discreteness, Low Light Focus, and Portability
In street settings, size and silent operation matter a lot.
With no built-in viewfinder, the Q-S1’s compact size and quiet operation make it less conspicuous. The 5 fps continuous shutter is a plus to seize spontaneous moments. However, low-light focusing can frustrate due to hunting.
The NX100’s larger size makes it more visible and slightly less nimble. Its AMOLED screen helps manual focusing in dim conditions, and the optional EVF is handy for street shooters who compose traditionally. Battery life here also favors longer sessions.
My take: The Q-S1 suits photographers prioritizing stealth and portability, whereas the NX100 offers better control where discretion is secondary.
Macro: Magnification, Precision, and Sharpness
Neither camera is optimized for macro, but both allow close focusing with the right lenses.
Pentax offers a few compact macro primes for the Q mount, usable but limited by sensor size for detail capture. The NX100 benefits from larger sensor resolution and more lenses, including some dedicated macro glass.
Manual focus assist on the NX100 (peaking) is helpful since neither have focus stacking or bracketing features.
Night and Astro Photography: High ISO and Exposure Modes
Shooting stars or night scenes demands noise control and exposure options.
The NX100 supports up to ISO 6400 natively, with cleaner files at higher ISOs thanks to the larger sensor. The Q-S1 maxes out at ISO 12800 but quality deteriorates significantly past ISO 1600. For astrophotography, the NX100’s dynamic range and noise profile are markedly better.
Neither have long exposures beyond 30 seconds, limiting very long exposures without hacks.
Video: Recording Capabilities and Stabilization
Here I must say both cameras show their age.
The Pentax Q-S1 offers 1080p Full HD at 30 fps but has no microphone input, and video quality is average with visible rolling shutter. The sensor-based stabilization helps handheld footage stay steadier, a slight advantage.
The Samsung NX100 maxes out at 720p HD video and also lacks mic input. Stabilization depends on lenses, which reduces handheld comfort. Both cameras lack modern codecs or slow-motion modes.
If video is an important factor for you, newer mirrorless models clearly surpass these, but the Q-S1 slightly edges out with better resolution and stabilization.
Travel and All-Around Versatility: Size, Battery, and Adaptability
Travel photographers want cameras that balance image quality with portability and endurance.
The Q-S1’s ultra compactness and built-in stabilization make it an inviting travel companion, paired with a small selection of pancake and zoom lenses. Its battery life, however, restricts longer excursions without spares.
The NX100 is less pocketable but offers more battery stamina and lens diversity to cover many scenarios - from sweeping landscapes to portraits.
Professional Use: Durability, File Formats, and Workflow
Neither camera is designed for professional heavy-duty work; however, both offer:
- Raw capture for flexible post-processing
- Manual exposure modes for creative control
- Basic wireless or connectivity options (only USB 2.0 and HDMI)
Neither supports tethering or advanced professional workflow integrations. The NX100’s somewhat better raw quality and superior dynamic range make it a better candidate for serious amateurs or pros on a tight budget.
Verdict: Which Camera Fits Your Needs?
Both cameras have admirable qualities and clear trade-offs. The Samsung NX100, despite its age, provides stronger image quality, longer battery life, and more lens choices, especially in disciplined photography genres like landscape, portraits, and travel.
The Pentax Q-S1’s claim to fame is undoubtedly its super compact size and user-friendly in-body stabilization, appealing to those who prioritize portability and casual shooting.
For a clearer picture:
| Photography Type | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Portrait | Samsung NX100 – better sensor & bokeh |
| Landscape | Samsung NX100 – higher resolution |
| Wildlife | Samsung NX100 – better lens options |
| Sports | Pentax Q-S1 – faster burst, lightweight |
| Street | Pentax Q-S1 – compact & discreet |
| Macro | Samsung NX100 – more lens choices |
| Night/Astro | Samsung NX100 – cleaner high ISO |
| Video | Pentax Q-S1 – 1080p & stabilization |
| Travel | Depends: Q-S1 for compactness, NX100 for battery/lens versatility |
| Professional workflows | Samsung NX100 – better raw files |
Closing Thoughts
Choosing between these two cameras ultimately hinges on what you shoot and how you prioritize features. Neither is cutting-edge by 2024 standards, but both hold charm for niche users:
- The Pentax Q-S1 is a fun, quirky gadget that excels when you want an ultra-portable, stabilized point-and-shoot mirrorless.
- The Samsung NX100 is closer to a dedicated beginner’s enthusiast tool with a larger sensor and more versatile system.
In my experience, if image quality and creative control demand precedence, I recommend hunting down a Samsung NX100. If you treasure pocketability and the delight of tiny tech gadgets, the Pentax Q-S1 won’t disappoint.
Happy shooting!
Pentax Q-S1 vs Samsung NX100 Specifications
| Pentax Q-S1 | Samsung NX100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model type | Pentax Q-S1 | Samsung NX100 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2014-08-04 | 2010-09-14 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Q Engine | DRIMe Engine |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 15 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Pentax Q | Samsung NX |
| Total lenses | 8 | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | - | VGA AMOLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 203g (0.45 pounds) | 282g (0.62 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 120 x 71 x 35mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 62 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.7 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 563 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 pictures | 420 pictures |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | D-LI68 | BP1130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $250 | $386 |