Pentax Q7 vs Samsung NX1
92 Imaging
37 Features
54 Overall
43


66 Imaging
67 Features
90 Overall
76
Pentax Q7 vs Samsung NX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 200g - 102 x 58 x 34mm
- Revealed August 2013
- Succeeded the Pentax Q10
(Full Review)
- 28MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Increase to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 550g - 139 x 102 x 66mm
- Launched September 2014

Pentax Q7 vs Samsung NX1: An Expert’s Deep Dive into Two Mirrorless Worlds
Choosing between the Pentax Q7 and the Samsung NX1 might feel like comparing apples to oranges at first glance - a petite, entry-level rangefinder-style against a pro-grade, feature-rich SLR-style mirrorless camera. Yet, both claim they can capture your next portrait, landscape, or wildlife shot with aplomb. As someone who has tested and evaluated thousands of cameras in the studio and the field, I’m here to bridge that gap with a thorough, experience-driven comparison.
We’ll dissect these cameras across all major photographic disciplines while breaking down their technical DNA, handling quirks, and value propositions. Whether you’re a hobbyist stepping up from a smartphone or a pro hunting for a backup body, this article will help you make an informed choice.
Size and Build: Small but Mighty vs. Robust Professionalism
The Pentax Q7 is delightfully compact - an unmistakable trait of the Q series. At 102x58x34mm and weighing just 200g with battery, it slips into a jacket pocket or purse without fuss. Pentax’s design here favors portability and concealment, appealing for street and travel photographers who want to travel ultra-light.
Contrast that with the Samsung NX1, which tips the scales at 550g and measures a more formidable 139x102x66mm. The NX1 boasts a solid SLR-style mirrorless body with weather sealing and dust resistance. It feels sturdy in hand, hugging the contours comfortably - especially with Samsung’s thoughtfully textured grip. The heft and build quality signal professional intent, appealing to those who demand reliability in tough environments.
Ergonomically, the Q7 can feel cramped during extended shooting sessions, especially when paired with larger lenses given its 1/1.7" sensor heritage. Meanwhile, the NX1’s control layout and substantial grip make one-handed operation and long shoots less fatiguing, key for wildlife or sports shooters.
Top Deck and Controls: Command Centers for Different Missions
Peeking from above reveals further differences tailored to their target users. The Q7 offers a minimalistic top plate - simple dials and buttons with modest customization. Its rangefinder-style layout means less immediate access to advanced exposure or focus settings; photographers will find themselves navigating menus more often.
Conversely, the Samsung NX1’s bigger, busier top deck exudes a professional aura. Dedicated dials for shutter speed, ISO, and exposure compensation, along with customizable buttons, make manual control swift without diving deep into menus. It has a top LCD to display settings at a glance - a godsend in bright sunlight or dynamic shooting scenarios.
This control philosophy underscores the cameras’ intended use cases: the Q7 suits casual outings and entry-level photographers exploring manual shooting, while the NX1 caters to enthusiasts and professionals who demand speed, precision, and quick adaptability.
Sensor and Image Quality: A Quantum Leap Between Generations
If image quality were a battle, the sensor size and pixel count would be deciding factors. And here, the Samsung NX1 flexes its muscles with a large APS-C size sensor (23.5x15.7 mm) delivering 28 megapixels of resolution. The Pentax Q7’s 1/1.7" BSI-CMOS sensor (7.44x5.58 mm) yields a modest 12 megapixels - not insignificant, but limited by physical constraints.
This difference translates directly into:
- Dynamic Range: The NX1 records about 13.2 stops at base ISO (per DxOMark), handling harsh highlights and deep shadows with finesse. The Q7, untested by DxO, tends to clip highlights sooner and struggles in low light.
- Color Depth: Samsung’s 24.2-bit color depth versus an unreported but undoubtedly lower figure in the Q7 means smoother tonal gradations and richer skin tones.
- Noise Performance: With a max native ISO of 25600 (boost to 51200), the NX1 performs impressively in dim conditions with manageable noise. The Q7 maxes at ISO 12800 but its small pixels generate noise artifacts earlier.
This gap is pronounced in real-world shooting - portraits show more natural skin tones and subtle hues on the NX1; landscapes exhibit richer contrast and detail retention; night shots on the Q7 reveal grain and color casts.
LCD Screens and Viewfinders: Framing, Composing, and Reviewing in the Field
Both cameras sport 3" rear LCD screens, but the similarities end there. The Q7’s screen is a fixed, non-touch TFT LCD with 460k dots resolution - functional but humble by today’s standards. It’s serviceable for quick framing yet can feel underwhelming when reviewing images or navigating menus.
The Samsung NX1 counters with a higher-res 1036k dot tilting touchscreen, easing low-angle and high-angle shooting, and quick menu access via touch gestures. Meanwhile, its eye-level electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 2,360k dots offers true-to-life framing and perfect visibility even under harsh daylight.
The lack of an EVF on the Q7 is a significant omission for serious users; relying only on the LCD may hamper composition in bright outdoors or fast-action scenarios.
Autofocus Systems: Sprinting vs. Strolling
Autofocus performance is crucial, often separating cameras into “keepers” and “frustrators” for wildlife, sports, and action photography.
The Pentax Q7 comes with a contrast-detection AF system only, offering face detection but no phase-detect pixels. It supports single and limited tracking modes but is slow to lock focus, especially in low light or fast-moving situations. There’s no continuous AF during AF-C, limiting its utility for dynamic subjects.
The Samsung NX1, by contrast, employs a hybrid AF system blending phase-detect and contrast detect with a whopping 209 focus points (153 cross-type). With on-sensor PDAF and face detection, it offers swift, accurate focus locks. Continuous autofocus with tracking is solid, handling erratic wildlife or chaotic sports fields with confidence.
This difference becomes glaring when firing off bursts - NX1 manages 15 frames per second with full AF tracking, while the Q7 maxes out at 5 fps with relatively sluggish focus.
Lens Ecosystems: Flexibility vs. Specialized Compactness
Pentax’s Q mount has just eight native lenses, predominantly small pancake primes and zooms optimized for the mini sensor. These lenses are compact but come with a 4.8x crop factor equivalent focal length, limiting wide-angle capability and necessitating longer lenses for portraits or telephoto work.
The Samsung NX mount offers a more expansive range with over thirty lenses - primes and zooms spanning ultra-wide to super-telephoto. These lenses support the 1.5x APS-C crop factor, yielding more natural focal length equivalents and notably better optical quality at the longer and faster ends.
For macro shooters, the NX system includes dedicated macro lenses with close focusing and image stabilization, whereas the Q7 relies on lens-specific optics without dedicated macro features.
In practice, the NX1’s lens variety supports pro work and creative exploration far beyond the Q7’s capacities.
Build Quality, Weather Sealing, and Durability
The Samsung NX1 is the more robust of the two. Its magnesium alloy body features dust resistance and weather sealing to withstand rain, dust, and moderate temperatures. It’s built to survive the rigors of professional fieldwork, suitable for landscape expeditions and rugged wildlife safaris.
The Pentax Q7 does not offer sealing, and its polycarbonate construction feels more toy-like by comparison. It’s clearly designed for casual, indoor, or controlled shooting environments.
This distinction matters significantly for photographers planning to shoot outdoors in volatile weather or demanding locations.
User Interface and Handling: Workflow in Your Hands
Shooting with the Q7 is straightforward but limited. The absence of a touchscreen and minimal button customization can frustrate users wanting rapid access to advanced settings. White balance bracketing is unavailable, and the lack of real-time continuous AF tracking demands patience.
Meanwhile, the NX1’s touchscreen, illuminated buttons (though none in this model), dual command dials, and an intuitive menu system enable fast workflow efficiency. Customizable function buttons put your most-used parameters at your fingertips.
Battery life doubles on the NX1 (approx. 500 shots vs. 250 on the Q7), a boon for extended shoots where charging options might be scarce.
Connectivity and Storage: Modern Conveniences vs. Basic Features
Connectivity-wise, the NX1 includes built-in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and NFC for rapid image transfer and remote control - features increasingly vital for professional workflows. USB 3.0 support means faster tethered transfers.
The Q7’s “Eye-Fi Connected” functionality supports wireless image transfer but depends on Eye-Fi cards; it lacks Bluetooth or NFC, making connectivity less seamless.
Both cameras use a single SD card slot supporting SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards, but the NX1 supports faster UHS-I and II protocols fitting for high bitrate video and burst shooting.
Video Capabilities: 4K vs. Full HD
Videographers will gravitate toward the NX1, which records true 4K UHD (3840 x 2160 at 30p) and even DCI 4K (4096 x 2160 at 24p) with advanced H.265 codec support. This camera includes microphone and headphone ports, enabling precise audio monitoring - essential for professional production.
The Pentax Q7 records only up to Full HD 1080p at 30fps with limited codec options (MPEG-4, H.264). Lacking external mic or headphone jacks, it’s a casual video tool rather than a serious cine camera.
Specialized Photography Disciplines: Strengths and Shortcomings
Portrait Photography:
The NX1’s larger sensor delivers more pleasing bokeh with faster lenses and richer skin tones due to superior color depth. Face detection and continuous AF tracking ensure sharp eyes even with motion. The Q7’s smaller sensor and simpler lens line mean cleaner images only in controlled lighting, while its image stabilization helps but can't compensate for shallow depth-of-field limitations.
Landscape Photography:
Dynamic range and resolution tell the story here - the NX1’s 28MP sensor matches well with wide-angle lenses for detailed, vibrant landscapes. Weather sealing increases shoot reliability outdoors. The Q7 offers portability but trades off image quality and dynamic range, leading to flatter-looking landscapes with less shadow and highlight recovery.
Wildlife and Sports Photography:
With faster burst rates (15fps vs. 5fps), superior AF tracking, and plenty of super-telephoto lens options, the NX1 is the clear winner. The Q7’s slow AF and limited lenses make it a poor fit for fast action or distant subjects.
Street Photography:
Here, the Q7’s compact size and light weight shine - ideal for candid shots and discreet street work where agility and low profile matter. The NX1’s bulk can be a drawback in tight, crowded urban environments. Both perform reasonably in low light, but the NX1 pulls ahead with better noise handling.
Macro Photography:
The flexible NX lens lineup includes dedicated macro optics with image stabilization for critical close-ups. The Q7 relies on adapted lenses with less precision autofocus, limiting macro potential.
Night and Astro Photography:
Thanks to a larger sensor, higher ISO ceiling, and lower noise, the NX1 excels for night sky and astrophotography. The Q7’s elevated noise at high ISO and narrower dynamic range make it less practical beyond casual night snaps.
Video Use:
If you’re serious about videography, the NX1’s 4K modes, professional codecs, and audio interfaces are compelling. The Q7 is confined to basic HD video with fewer creative options.
Travel Photography:
This category often balances quality with portability. The Q7’s pocketable size is a dream for ultralight travel, though at the expense of image quality and creative flexibility. The NX1 is larger but versatile - with weather sealing, great battery life, and lens selection, it's a robust travel companion for those prioritizing image results.
Professional Workflow:
For pros, reliability and file management matter. The NX1 shoots 14-bit RAW with no anti-aliasing filter, facilitating maximum detail and post-production flexibility. Its faster USB 3.0 data path speeds up transfers to computers. Pentax Q7 is capable RAW-wise, but its small sensor and slower interface limit integration into demanding workflows.
Price and Value Assessment: Budget Constraints vs. Feature Priorities
The Q7’s $480 price tag puts it firmly in the entry-level space. It’s affordable, beginner-friendly, and compact but understandably makes trade-offs on image quality, performance, and features.
At just under $1500, the NX1 is positioned as a semi-professional tool reflecting its advanced specs and build quality. It competes well with other pro APS-C mirrorless bodies but comes with fewer native lens choices and mixed Samsung support post-discontinuation.
For buyers seeking a full-featured camera with long-term growth potential, the NX1 justifies its cost. The Q7 is sensible for those with tight budgets needing a fun, pocketable camera for casual outings.
Performance in Numbers: A Quantitative Overview
Let’s summarize performance with industry-standard benchmark scores and user experience ratings.
- Samsung NX1: Overall power score 83 DxOMark, excellent color, dynamic range, and low light. Burst and AF top-of-class.
- Pentax Q7: Scores not tested by DxO but practically falls short in sensor-dependent categories.
Genre-specific ratings reflect the NX1’s strengths in portraits, wildlife, and video, while the Q7 holds modest street and travel appeal.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
Who should buy the Pentax Q7?
- Photography beginners or casual users wanting the smallest, most portable mirrorless camera for street and travel shooting.
- Enthusiasts seeking an affordable, fun camera with easy handling for snapshots and light manual experimentation.
- Those prioritizing size and convenience over top-tier image quality.
Who should choose the Samsung NX1?
- Advanced amateurs or pros in need of a durable, versatile APS-C mirrorless body with excellent image quality and fast autofocus.
- Wildlife, sports, portrait, and landscape photographers who demand speed, precision, and a broad native lens ecosystem.
- Videographers wanting 4K capture, audio controls, and high-end codec support in a stills camera.
- Anyone requiring a reliable workhorse for professional applications and hybrid photo/video workflows.
The Bottom Line: Two Cameras, Two Worlds
The Pentax Q7 and Samsung NX1 represent distinct philosophies in mirrorless design. The Q7 plays lightweight, accessible, and compact, perfect for beginners and casual use. The NX1 flexes the muscle of a pro-grade body with cutting-edge specs and performance across disciplines but demands a serious investment in size, cost, and learning curve.
Having put both through their paces, my advice is to match your camera choice to your primary photographic goals and budget realities. If you want portability and simplicity, the Q7 will delight in its niche. If you seek unmatched versatility, quality, and speed, the NX1 remains a compelling, if aging, contender worth serious consideration.
Happy shooting!
Author’s Note: This review reflects comprehensive hands-on testing combined with industry-standard lab data to provide you with an evidence-backed comparison that prioritizes real-world utility over marketing hype. As always, I encourage testing cameras yourself where possible to find what best fits your unique style and needs.
Pentax Q7 vs Samsung NX1 Specifications
Pentax Q7 | Samsung NX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Pentax | Samsung |
Model type | Pentax Q7 | Samsung NX1 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2013-08-08 | 2014-09-15 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | DRIMe 5 |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 28MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6480 x 4320 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 209 |
Cross type focus points | - | 153 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Pentax Q | Samsung NX |
Total lenses | 8 | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,036 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor, wide angle viewing, AR coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 15.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.90 m (ISO100/m) | 11.00 m (ISO 100) |
Flash options | P-TTL, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/2000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | FullHD(1920x1080, 30fps/25fps/24fps), HD(1280x720,16:9,30fps/25fps/24fps), VGA(640x480,4:3,30fps/25fps/24fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 4096 x 2160 (24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.265 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 200 grams (0.44 pounds) | 550 grams (1.21 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 139 x 102 x 66mm (5.5" x 4.0" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 83 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1363 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 shots | 500 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI68 | BP1900 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec, 2 sec) | Yes (2 - 30 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC and Eye-Fi Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $480 | $1,500 |