Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung WB250F
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97642/97642f005c0d8e683d1835fc201f1ba1eeb0e238" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS front Pentax WG-3 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f3d0/6f3d00d7c30cb034b59ae160397ff233ae021e98" alt="Samsung WB250F front Samsung WB250F front"
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced July 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Pentax WG-3 GPS versus Samsung WB250F, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Pentax and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The WG-3 GPS was announced 7 months later than the WB250F which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief overview of how the WG-3 GPS matches up against the WB250F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Pentax WG-3 GPS and Samsung WB250F. The whole galleries are provided at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery and Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Samsung WB250F
WG-3 GPS | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2013 | ![]() | January 2013 | Fresher by 7 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
WB250F | WG-3 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Samsung WB250F
WG-3 GPS | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Pentax WG-3 GPS offers outside dimensions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB250F has measurements of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
See the Pentax WG-3 GPS versus Samsung WB250F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-3 GPS compared to the WB250F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb139/bb139b492b1bf607892294ff35a840a22732f57d" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung WB250F size comparison Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung WB250F size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-3 GPS and WB250F is 90 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0bf2e/0bf2edd276f39aa62e85bb249214bf79055271b6" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung WB250F top view buttons comparison Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung WB250F top view buttons comparison"
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading through specifications. The photograph underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-3 GPS and WB250F.
Plainly, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but different resolution. You should expect to see the Pentax WG-3 GPS to give greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The more recent WG-3 GPS provides an edge in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b2d2/8b2d2a3a3a020be5875a7d3a02cbed8f9c77fb78" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung WB250F sensor size comparison Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung WB250F sensor size comparison"
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e5a3/7e5a3e56065c08b7914ee7f73c358df0831a7b96" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung WB250F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung WB250F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
Pentax WG-3 GPS | Samsung WB250F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Pentax | Samsung |
Model type | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Samsung WB250F |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-07-19 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.40 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 238 grams (0.52 lb) | 226 grams (0.50 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $350 | $250 |