Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma SD9
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97642/97642f005c0d8e683d1835fc201f1ba1eeb0e238" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS front Pentax WG-3 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d88a7/d88a7812e71c59a9e4e86f9ed56f4270378edf4e" alt="Sigma SD9 front Sigma SD9 front"
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced July 2013
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Launched November 2002
- Successor is Sigma SD10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Following is a complete assessment of the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Sigma SD9, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Pentax and Sigma. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the WG-3 GPS (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) boast different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The WG-3 GPS was brought out 10 years after the SD9 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a short highlight of how the WG-3 GPS matches up vs the SD9 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Pentax WG-3 GPS and Sigma SD9. The entire galleries are provided at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery and Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Sigma SD9
WG-3 GPS | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2013 | ![]() | November 2002 | More modern by 130 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 130k | Crisper display (+330k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
SD9 | WG-3 GPS |
---|
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Sigma SD9
WG-3 GPS | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Pentax WG-3 GPS comes with outer measurements of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD9 has measurements of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Examine the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Sigma SD9 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the WG-3 GPS compared to the SD9.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/995a9/995a971277b929061986e88e5e60043ebe148edc" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma SD9 size comparison Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma SD9 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-3 GPS and SD9 is 90 and 54 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a90f9/a90f9723d4c7e57d31e705d0320af54f396890e9" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma SD9 top view buttons comparison Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma SD9 top view buttons comparison"
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizes only by checking out technical specs. The image underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-3 GPS and SD9.
As you can tell, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The WG-3 GPS due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Pentax WG-3 GPS will produce extra detail having its extra 13 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The fresher WG-3 GPS should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/699b7/699b7157c247731bab91dc5cca0853523eca53a4" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma SD9 sensor size comparison Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma SD9 sensor size comparison"
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfd18/cfd18cb527ffb1a0b64ce856c55456367d4f6070" alt="Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma SD9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma SD9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Pentax WG-3 GPS | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Pentax | Sigma |
Model type | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Sigma SD9 |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2013-07-19 | 2002-11-26 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 3 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2268 x 1512 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 1.8 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 130 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.40 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 238 grams (0.52 lb) | 950 grams (2.09 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $350 | $3,001 |