Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung SL202
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
![Pentax WG-3 front Pentax WG-3 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Pentax-WG-3/Pentax-WG-3-front.jpg)
![Samsung SL202 front Samsung SL202 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-SL202/Samsung-SL202-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched July 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Other Name is PL50
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the Pentax WG-3 versus Samsung SL202, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Pentax and Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the WG-3 (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The WG-3 was revealed 4 years after the SL202 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the WG-3 grades versus the SL202 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax WG-3 and Samsung SL202. The full galleries are available at Pentax WG-3 Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Samsung SL202
WG-3 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2013 | ![]() | February 2009 | More modern by 54 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Pentax WG-3
SL202 | WG-3 |
---|
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung SL202
WG-3 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Pentax WG-3 enjoys exterior measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Pentax WG-3 versus Samsung SL202 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the WG-3 compared to the SL202.
![Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Pentax-WG-3-vs-Samsung-SL202-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-3 and SL202 is 90 and 94 respectively.
![Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Pentax-WG-3-vs-Samsung-SL202-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading through technical specs. The pic here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-3 and SL202.
As you have seen, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should count on the Pentax WG-3 to resolve greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The younger WG-3 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
![Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Pentax-WG-3-vs-Samsung-SL202-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
![Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Pentax-WG-3-vs-Samsung-SL202-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
Pentax WG-3 | Samsung SL202 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Pentax | Samsung |
Model type | Pentax WG-3 | Samsung SL202 |
Also called as | - | PL50 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-07-19 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.40 m | 4.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 168 grams (0.37 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $300 | $140 |