Pentax WG-3 vs Sony W710
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41


96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Pentax WG-3 vs Sony W710 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced July 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.2-6.5) lens
- 114g - 97 x 55 x 20mm
- Released January 2013

Pentax WG-3 vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W710: A Deep Dive into Compact Camera Versatility
When the compact camera market demands rugged versatility and everyday ease-of-use, two models stand out from the 2013 lineup: the Pentax WG-3 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W710. Both cameras fall into the compact category, but they are designed with markedly different priorities and user expectations in mind. After extensive hands-on testing and comparative evaluation, this article unpacks their strengths and compromises across every major photographic discipline - painting a clear picture for enthusiasts and professionals seeking dependable pocketable tools or dedicated rugged companions.
By the end of this detailed 2500-word comparison, you’ll have a grounded understanding of where these cameras excel, where they fall short, and for whom each is best suited.
A Tale of Two Compacts: Size, Feel, and Handling Considerations
Physical interaction with a camera sets the tone for the entire shooting experience. The Pentax WG-3, with its ruggedized, waterproof design, offers a markedly different ergonomic experience compared to the lightweight and slim Sony W710.
Holding the WG-3, you immediately notice its robust chassis - engineered not just for durability but for comfort in wet, cold, or dusty conditions. It measures 124 x 64 x 33 mm and weighs 230 g, delivering a sturdier, almost tool-like presence in hand. The tactile feel benefits from thoughtful button spacing and a grippy textured body, crucial when shooting outdoors or underwater. The Pentax’s physical dimensions bulk up around a fixed lens that extends and retracts smoothly - indicating its readiness for action without fear of damage.
By contrast, the Sony W710 is ultra-compact and lightweight at just 97 x 55 x 20 mm and 114 g, making it a nimble candidate for casual day-to-day shooting - ideal for slipping into small bags or even larger pockets. While this slim build enhances portability, it comes at the cost of less robust environmental sealing or grip comfort especially for prolonged outdoor use. The plastic finish feels shiny but somewhat simplistic.
Both cameras lack viewfinders, relying exclusively on their rear LCDs for framing. This omission is unsurprising given their entry-level status, but it does influence usability under bright sunlight or when shooting fast-moving subjects.
Top-Down: Control Layout and User Interface Differences
A camera’s control layout is essential for intuitive operation and quick access to critical settings - a priority when capturing fleeting moments.
The Pentax WG-3’s tightly grouped, prominently sized buttons are built for quick, confident access. Despite its lack of exposure modes beyond preset scene selections, the WG-3 manages to incorporate useful features like an easily toggled macro mode and an effective flash control scheme. The control dial is noticeably absent, simplifying the user interface but limiting customization.
The Sony W710’s touchscreen LCD introduces a modern interaction layer uncommon in lower-tier compacts circa 2013, facilitating menu navigation and selection with finger taps and swipes. The physical buttons are compact and a little cramped given the smaller body, reducing tactile legibility. I found touch input generally responsive, which helps compensate for the limited physical controls.
Neither camera supports manual exposure modes or shutter/aperture priority, aiming instead at novice photographers or those who want to shoot reliably with minimal tweaking.
Sensor Size and Image Quality Fundamentals
At the heart of every camera’s image quality is its sensor technology and performance envelope.
Both cameras sport a 1/2.3” sensor measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm (around 28.07 mm²), which is standard for compact cameras of their era. They share a 16-megapixel resolution producing 4608 x 3456 pixel images. While this resolution is adequate for prints up to A3 size, it pushes the pixel density higher than ideal for such small sensors - potentially impacting noise and dynamic range.
However, the WG-3 uses a BSI-CMOS sensor, a notable advantage over the Sony’s CCD sensor architecture. CMOS sensors typically deliver better noise performance and higher readout speeds, which translate to improved low-light capabilities and video frame rates - the Pentax max ISO is 6400 compared to Sony’s 3200 maximum. In the real world, I observed the WG-3 producing cleaner images at ISO 800–1600, whereas the Sony’s files quickly degraded into visible noise.
The WG-3’s inclusion of an anti-reflective coated widescreen TFT LCD also aids in visibility during framing and reviewing images outdoors.
Screen and Interface: LCD Quality Influences Experience
A camera’s rear screen is a photographer’s primary window to compose, review, and interact with settings.
The Pentax WG-3 offers a 3-inch, 460k-dot fixed widescreen LCD with an anti-reflective coating. The larger screen real estate and improved resolution made focusing and checking exposure easier in varied lighting conditions. While not touch-sensitive, it’s bright and sufficiently color-accurate for quick edits on the fly.
The Sony W710 features a smaller 2.7-inch, 230k-dot touchscreen display, introducing easier menu navigation but at a cost to resolution and brightness. The touchscreen responsiveness is commendable but the reduced color gamut and resolution mean finer focus confirmation or subtle exposure checks are less reliable.
For photographers prioritizing precise manual interaction, the WG-3’s screen wins. For casual shooters who value touchscreen convenience, the W710 makes compromises worth considering.
Sturdy vs. Slim: Build Quality and Weather Resistance
If you’re venturing into less predictable conditions, build robustness and sealing matter greatly.
The Pentax WG-3 is designed as a rugged champion - waterproof up to 10 meters, freeze-proof to -10°C, shockproof from 1.5 meters, and crushproof up to 100 kgf. This suite of protections integrates seamlessly into the compact body, perfect for underwater adventures, winter sports, or dusty terrain. The limited lens zoom range (25-100 mm equivalent) is balanced by the assurance that you can shoot worry-free in harsh environments. The sensor-shift image stabilization further aids handheld shooting where tripods can’t go.
The Sony W710 isn’t built to withstand the elements; it lacks any weather sealing and is vulnerable to dust and moisture ingress. Its max aperture of f/3.2-6.5 and longer zoom range (28-140 mm) favor daylight, non-challenging shooting scenarios. This means it’s best suited for indoor, travel, family-event, or street photography under good conditions.
For shooters who want a reliable camera that doubles as a rugged companion, the WG-3’s construction is a decisive advantage.
Autofocus Systems in Practice: Precision vs. Speed
Autofocus is arguably the most critical operational aspect. Both cameras employ contrast-detection AF with face detection, but you can expect varied regional capabilities.
The Pentax WG-3 offers 9 focus points with multi-area AF and face detection, and includes tracking autofocus. While not blazing fast compared to modern mirrorless models, it performs admirably in daylight and handles macro focusing down to 1 cm - which is impressively close for a compact. This makes it versatile for nature close-ups and underwater subjects where precise focus is non-negotiable.
The Sony W710’s focus points are less clearly specified but it also supports multi-area AF, center-weighted AF, and face detection with limited tracking. The macro focusing range starts at 10 cm, which somewhat restricts close-up creativity. I found the autofocus occasionally slow to lock in low contrast or low light, but generally adequate for casual snapshots.
Neither supports manual focus or focus bracketing, underscoring their intent as convenient point-and-shoot options.
Burst Shooting and Video Performance: Action and Motion Capture
While both cameras lack advanced video features catering to professional cinematographers, their modest offerings cover basic motion capture.
The Pentax WG-3 provides 10 fps continuous shooting, allowing quick bursts during wildlife or sports photography at shorter focal lengths. Video recording maxes out at Full HD (1920 x 1080) at 30 fps in H.264, which is respectable for cameras of this class from 2013. Unfortunately, the WG-3 lacks external microphone input, limiting audio quality improvements.
The Sony W710 slows down to just 1 fps burst rate - too sluggish for any serious action photography - but offers video at 1280 x 720 (HD) at 30 fps, and a unique AVCHD video format option, potentially better for compression efficiency. Its video capabilities are more casual and low-res compared to the Pentax.
Neither camera implements advanced video stabilization beyond optical/sensor shift, nor provide advanced exposure tools for videography.
Lens Focal Range and Macro Capabilities Compared
Lens flexibility strongly influences what kinds of photographs you can comfortably capture.
The Pentax WG-3’s fixed lens covers 25-100 mm equivalent focal lengths (4x zoom) with a bright max aperture starting from f/2.0 at wide end - quite potent for a compact. This allows better low-light and shallow depth-of-field performance, which is crucial in portrait and macro work. Its 1 cm macro focusing distance is particularly impressive and lets you achieve tight close-ups with fine detail.
The Sony W710 zooms further - from 28 to 140 mm (5x zoom), but the maximum aperture is slower (f/3.2-6.5), limiting creative control over background blur and low light capacity at telephoto. Its macro limit of 10 cm means you cannot get as close for extreme detail shots.
For portrait photographers or macro enthusiasts, the WG-3’s optics have the edge. For casual travel or street photography needing reach and light weight, the Sony’s longer zoom could be attractive.
Image Stabilization: Subtle but Vital
Both cameras utilize image stabilization to mitigate handheld blur, but the approaches differ.
The Pentax WG-3 implements sensor-shift (five-axis) stabilization, which compensates for a wider range of shakes and vibrations, especially helpful during macro, underwater, or telephoto shooting. This contributes significantly to sharper images at slower shutter speeds or longer focal lengths.
The Sony W710 employs optical stabilization in the lens, a common and effective method that also reduces blur but with potentially less comprehensive correction than sensor-shift systems. It still aids in everyday casual shooting but may fall short in challenging shaky conditions.
In my testing, the Pentax’s stabilization consistently enabled sharper handheld results at lower ISOs and slower shutter speeds.
Battery Life and Storage Flexibility
Practical usability extends beyond image quality to include endurance and media compatibility.
Both cameras use proprietary rechargeable battery packs with approximately 240 shots per charge under standard conditions - a modest figure that might require spares for long trips. The WG-3’s D-LI92 vs. Sony’s NP-BN batteries provide similar runtime in real-world use.
Regarding storage, the Pentax supports SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards and includes some internal memory for added resilience. The Sony accepts these same SD cards but also supports Memory Stick Duo and Pro Duo formats - a nod to Sony’s ecosystem compatibility but adding complexity to card selection.
Connectivity and Extras: Wireless and Ports
In an era where instant sharing is common, connectivity options matter.
The Pentax WG-3 integrates Eye-Fi wireless card support, enabling wireless image transfer if combined with compatible memory cards. It also features a standard HDMI port for playback on monitors or TVs, plus USB 2.0 for tethered transfer.
The Sony W710 lacks any wireless capabilities altogether and connects only via USB 2.0. It omits HDMI out, which may limit viewing options.
Neither camera offers Bluetooth, NFC, GPS, microphone jacks, or headphone outputs - unsurprising for entry compacts, but notable compromises compared to modern standards.
How They Perform Across Photography Genres
Let’s zoom out now and consider these cameras through the lens of general photographic disciplines, informed by rigorous genre-specific field testing.
Portraits
- Pentax WG-3: The wide f/2 aperture coupled with effective face detection yields pleasantly blurred backgrounds and accurate skin tones, a rarity among rugged cameras. Eye detection autofocus is present but basic.
- Sony W710: The smaller maximum aperture and lower LCD resolution make tight portraits less striking. Face detection is functional but less consistently sharp.
Landscapes
- Pentax WG-3: Its sensor technology and robustness offer excellent durability for outdoor landscapes, with pleasing dynamic range and detail capture in good light. Weather sealing is a massive plus.
- Sony W710: Limited dynamic range and lack of weatherproofing restrict outdoor landscapes to fair-weather conditions.
Wildlife
- Pentax WG-3: Faster burst shooting (10 fps) and reliable autofocus tracking aid in wildlife capture at short zoom ranges.
- Sony W710: Slow 1 fps burst and weaker AF performance make it less suitable for wildlife action.
Sports
- Pentax WG-3: Though not suited for professional sports, its 10 fps continuous shooting and decent tracking autofocus allow casual sports capture.
- Sony W710: Limited burst and slower shutter limit sporting usability.
Street
- Pentax WG-3: Bulkier and more conspicuous; less ideal for candid street photography.
- Sony W710: Small size and unobtrusive design favor street shooters who prioritize portability.
Macro
- Pentax WG-3: Outstanding with 1 cm focusing distance and sensor-shift stabilization.
- Sony W710: Less capable macro focusing limits creativity.
Night / Astrophotography
- Pentax WG-3: Superior high ISO range up to 6400 and robust build for cold nights aids astrophotography beginners.
- Sony W710: Lower ISO ceiling and slower lens restrict ability in dim conditions.
Video
- Pentax WG-3: Full HD 1080p at 30 fps and better stabilization deliver smoother handheld movies.
- Sony W710: HD 720p with more limited frame rate options.
Travel
- Pentax WG-3: Bulkier, but rugged reliability and splash resistance reward adventurous travelers.
- Sony W710: Ultra-light and pocket-friendly, perfect for urban and easy itineraries.
Professional Use
Neither camera offers RAW support, manual controls, or tethering for professional workflows, but their ruggedness (WG-3) or portability (W710) can supplement professionals needing backup or casual proofing cameras.
Overall Performance Ratings and Value for Money
Evaluating on a 100-point scale across sensibility, functionality, and price-to-performance balance, the Pentax WG-3 edges ahead in all critical realms - mostly due to its rugged versatility, sensor advantages, and more comprehensive feature set.
The Sony W710 excels as an ultra-affordable, ultra-compact shooter ideal for casual users on a tight budget or those who prize lightness over ruggedness.
Genre-Specific Performance Insights
A reiteration of how each camera suits different photographic genres:
Genre | Pentax WG-3 | Sony W710 |
---|---|---|
Portrait | Very Good | Fair |
Landscape | Very Good | Fair |
Wildlife | Good | Poor |
Sports | Good | Poor |
Street | Fair | Good |
Macro | Excellent | Fair |
Night/Astro | Good | Poor |
Video | Good | Fair |
Travel | Good | Excellent |
Professional Use | Fair | Poor |
Verdict and Recommendations: Which Camera Should You Choose?
My experience with both the Pentax WG-3 and Sony W710 reveals they serve fundamentally different photography needs despite sharing a compact body philosophy.
Choose the Pentax WG-3 if:
- You prioritize ruggedness and need a camera that won’t break a sweat underwater, in freezing weather, or after drops.
- You want better image quality, higher ISO performance, and versatile macro and action shooting capabilities.
- Your photography extends into landscapes, wildlife, or adventure travel where environmental sealing is a must.
- You prize stabilized handheld shooting and sharper selfies or portraits.
Choose the Sony W710 if:
- Your budget is tight and you want a very affordable, easy-to-use camera for casual snapshotting.
- You value extreme portability and a touchscreen interface for quick framing and settings.
- Your photographic pursuits are mainly daylight street photography, family photos, or travel in benign environments.
- You accept basic image quality in exchange for convenience and simplicity.
While neither camera competes with modern mirrorless or DSLRs, their design philosophies are clear. Pentax’s WG-3 is the robust compact mentality personified, designed to take punishing conditions and keep delivering solid image quality. The Sony W710 offers friendly, no-fuss point-and-shoot simplicity at a wallet-friendly price.
In sum, researching these cameras through hands-on testing - measuring sensor performance, ergonomics, autofocus accuracy, and real-world shooting versatility - helps unpack their true value beyond marketing blurbs. I hope this comprehensive comparison enables you to confidently pick the compact that best aligns with your photographic passions and shooting environments.
Happy shooting!
Pentax WG-3 vs Sony W710 Specifications
Pentax WG-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W710 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Pentax | Sony |
Model | Pentax WG-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W710 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-07-19 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.2-6.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | TFT LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.40 m | 2.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) | 114 gr (0.25 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 97 x 55 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | 240 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI92 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $300 | $90 |