Pentax X-5 vs Sony RX10 III
65 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43


53 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Pentax X-5 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-580mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 595g - 119 x 86 x 107mm
- Announced August 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Revealed March 2016
- Old Model is Sony RX10 II
- Refreshed by Sony RX10 IV

Pentax X-5 vs Sony RX10 III: Which Superzoom Bridge Camera Should You Choose?
In the vast realm of bridge cameras, finding the right fit boils down to your photography style, budget, and expectations. Today I’m diving into a detailed comparison between two noteworthy contenders: the Pentax X-5 - a budget-friendly small sensor superzoom from 2012 - and the Sony Cyber-shot RX10 III, a premium large sensor superzoom released in 2016. Both cameras flaunt long zoom ranges, DSLR-like ergonomics, and versatile usage scenarios, yet they cater to quite different user needs and technical demands.
Having tested both extensively in real-world conditions across multiple photography genres, I’ll break down their core differences with clarity, peppered with hands-on insights to help you decide which might be worth your investment.
Getting a Feel for Ergonomics and Physical Presence
First impressions matter, and with bridge cameras, size and handling often steer your shooting comfort over long sessions.
The Pentax X-5 is compact and lightweight at just 595 grams, packed into a notably smaller form factor (119x86x107 mm). It’s closer to a compact camera in feel, making it easy to carry during casual outings or travel shoots without weighing you down.
Contrast this with the Sony RX10 III, which weighs nearly twice as much at 1051 grams with larger dimensions (133x94x127 mm). It’s undeniably chunkier but, if you prefer a rugged grip and a robust build, the Sony’s weather sealing and solid construction pay dividends. This heft also translates into a more balanced feel, especially when paired with telephoto zooms which can otherwise feel front-heavy.
Next, a glance from above highlights the control layout differences:
The Sony RX10 III features more professional-grade controls, including a top LCD panel for quick settings review, configurable dials, and a mode dial with a well-thought hierarchy. The Pentax X-5 leans towards simplicity, with fewer buttons and a more beginner-friendly interface - perfect if you want intuitive accessibility but might feel limiting to seasoned photographers.
Sensor Size and Image Quality: Where the Gap Widens Dramatically
Sensor technology is where these cameras diverge sharply. The Pentax X-5 uses a small 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor (6.08 x 4.56 mm) with 16 MP resolution, typical for compact superzooms but limited in dynamic range and low-light prowess.
The Sony RX10 III, on the other hand, boasts a much larger 1-inch sensor (13.2 x 8.8 mm) with 20 MP, which dramatically elevates image quality, color depth, and high ISO performance.
To put this difference in perspective, the Sony’s sensor area is over four times larger, allowing it to capture more light, reduce noise, and deliver better tonal gradations. In my tests, photos from the RX10 III consistently show richer detail, improved sharpness, and better skin tones with less post-processing required.
The Pentax images, while respectable for casual use, reveal noise creeping in at ISO 800 and above, with dynamic range limitations impacting highlight and shadow detail recovery. Not ideal if you frequently shoot landscapes with bright skies or dim interiors.
Screen and Viewfinder: Facilitating Your Composition Workflow
For framing and reviewing, both cameras come equipped with tilting LCD screens sized at 3 inches, but their resolution and usability differ.
The Pentax X-5 offers a modest 460k-dot screen - serviceable but not dazzling, making critical focus inspection or image review a bit challenging under bright daylight.
The Sony RX10 III shines with a sharp 1229k-dot display and a high-quality electronic viewfinder (EVF) resolution of 2359k dots covering 100% frame. This makes composing in tricky lighting much more manageable. The EVF’s 0.7x magnification and eye sensor allow seamless switching between eye-level and LCD viewing, a convenience I appreciated while shooting fast action or wildlife.
Zoom Range versus Optical Quality: Which Lens Excels?
Both cameras sport impressive zoom ranges: Pentax’s 22-580mm equivalent (26x zoom) vs Sony’s 24-600mm (25x zoom). But numbers only tell part of the story.
The Pentax lens starts at a relatively slower maximum aperture (f/3.1), tapering off to f/5.9 at the tele end. Its performance is adequate for daylight but loses sharpness and contrast in lower light, and chromatic aberrations are noticeable at extreme zoom settings. Its macro mode impresses though, focusing down to just 1 cm, making it a fun tool for close-up snapshots.
Sony’s lens, with faster apertures (f/2.4-4.0), offers brighter optics that handle low-light shooting better and deliver creamier background blur - noticeably superior for portraits. The optical stabilization system is top-notch, helping to counteract camera shake even at 600mm.
Autofocus Systems and Shooting Speed: Tracking the Action
Autofocus speed and accuracy can make or break your experience in sports or wildlife photography.
The Pentax X-5 employs a 9-point contrast-detection AF system with face detection and basic AF tracking. While it locks focus reliably in bright conditions, it struggles with moving subjects, hunting noticeably in dimmer environments. Burst shooting tops out at 10 fps but without continuous AF, so success is hit-or-miss on fast action.
Sony impresses here with a 25-point contrast-detection AF augmented by Intelligent AF tracking and touchpad-like selective focusing, resulting in more confident tracking of erratic wildlife or athletes. Continuous AF support paired with 14 fps burst shooting helps seize fleeting moments with higher keeper rates.
Diverse Photography Disciplines: How Each Camera Stacks Up
We know that real photographers often cross genres - so let’s see how these two match up in common use cases.
Portrait Photography:
Sony’s large sensor grants better skin tone rendering and natural bokeh thanks to brighter lenses and optical quality. Face detection autofocus is more precise, aiding in capturing sharp eyes. Pentax works but can produce flatter images with less subject separation.
Landscape Photography:
Sony’s superior dynamic range and higher resolution give you richer files perfect for large prints or post-processing latitude. The Pentax’s limited range and 1/2.3" sensor restrict detail and tonal recovery. Weather sealing on the Sony adds confidence when shooting outdoors in rugged conditions.
Wildlife Photography:
Sony RX10 III’s longer telephoto reach with stabilized optics and faster AF make it the undisputed winner. Pentax’s slower AF and less flexible zoom limit your ability to capture fast-moving animals effectively.
Sports Photography:
The Sony’s higher burst rate and continuous autofocus allow you to freeze moments crisply. Pentax’s single AF mode and slower shutter ceiling maximum of 1/1500s force compromises in fast-paced settings.
Street Photography:
Pentax’s smaller size and lighter weight help you stay discreet and mobile, although image quality takes a backseat. The Sony feels bulkier but offers best-in-class image quality and low-light capability. Choice depends on your priorities.
Macro Photography:
Pentax’s 1cm macro focus is impressive but lacks precision and stabilization at close range. Sony focuses down to 3cm with superior stabilization and sharper rendering, giving you detailed macro images without a dedicated lens.
Night and Astro Photography:
The Sony’s higher ISO ceiling (native 12800, extended to 25600) and larger sensor dominate low-light and astrophotography scenarios. Pentax’s max ISO is 6400 with a significantly noisier sensor, limiting nighttime shooting quality.
Video Capabilities:
Sony wins hands-down with UHD 4K recording, high frame rate 1080p, and external microphone/headphone jacks for professional audio monitoring. The Pentax records Full HD 1080p at 30fps in Motion JPEG format, with no audio ports, making it a basic video tool.
Travel Photography:
Pentax weighs less, is simpler to use, and more budget-friendly, appealing to casual travelers who prioritize portability. Sony caters to enthusiasts who want versatility, stellar image quality, and don’t mind the added size and cost.
Professional Work:
Sony’s robust build, weather sealing, RAW file support, and extensive customization integrate well into professional workflows. Pentax lacks RAW support and pro features, so it’s best as a secondary or entry-level device.
Build Quality, Weather Resistance, and Durability
While the Pentax X-5 offers a plastic and lightweight chassis without weather resistance, the Sony RX10 III features comprehensive environmental sealing shielding it against dust and moisture. For photographers shooting in varied conditions, this is a clear advantage, extending the camera’s longevity and usability in rain or dusty environments.
Battery Life and Storage Flexibility
Sony pushes slightly ahead here with 420 shots per charge using its proprietary NP-FW50 battery versus the Pentax’s 330 shots powered by 4x AA batteries. While interchangeable AAs are convenient in some cases, I found the Sony’s longer battery life and fast charging more reliable during extended shoots.
Sony also supports multiple memory card formats: SD and Memory Stick Duo variants, whereas Pentax uses only SD cards. Both cameras have single slots, so for high-volume photo or video capture, you’ll want to invest in fast cards anyway.
Connectivity and Wireless Capabilities
The Pentax X-5 comes with Eye-Fi wireless support for limited WiFi-like transfers via compatible cards but lacks modern Bluetooth and NFC connectivity. The Sony RX10 III upgrades to built-in WiFi with NFC, enabling easier image sharing and remote shooting via smartphone apps - a vital feature if you value instant connectivity in today’s workflow.
Price-to-Performance: What Are You Getting?
The Pentax X-5 sells for around $230, placing it firmly in the budget category. It suits beginners or casual shooters wanting an all-in-one zoom at an affordable price but who are not concerned with professional-quality output or advanced features.
The Sony RX10 III, priced closer to $1400, demands serious commitment but offers significantly better image quality, performance, and flexibility. It delivers excellent value for advanced enthusiasts or professionals seeking a one-camera solution spanning wide to long telephoto ranges.
Sample Gallery: Side-by-Side Image Comparison
To truly appreciate the differences, here is a collection of sample images taken from both cameras under varied lighting and subject conditions.
You’ll notice Sony images exhibit greater detail, smoother tones, and less noise on high ISO, while Pentax results tend to look softer with visible noise and contrast limitations.
Overall Performance Scores: Summarizing Technical Merit
Industry-standard benchmarks score the Sony RX10 III notably higher than the Pentax X-5 in almost every respect.
Sony’s 70-point score reflects excellence in image quality, dynamic range, and autofocus. Pentax, untested by DxOMark officially, sits lower based on sensor size constraints and dated tech.
Genre-Specific Scores Reveal Strengths and Weaknesses
Delving deeper, this graph displays how each camera performs across key photography types.
Sony excels in portraits, wildlife, sports, and low-light work. Pentax holds manageable ground for travel, street, and casual macro, where portability and affordability trump ultimate specs.
Final Takeaways: Which Camera Fits Your Photography?
Here’s where my experience translates into actionable guidance:
-
Choose Pentax X-5 if:
- You want the cheapest all-in-one superzoom solution.
- Portability and ease of use are paramount.
- Your shooting is casual, mostly daylight, travel, and street.
- You don’t need RAW files or advanced video features.
-
Go for Sony RX10 III if:
- Image quality is your top priority - especially in tricky lighting.
- You photograph sports, wildlife, or landscapes seriously.
- Need pro-level usability: weather sealing, fast AF, 4K video.
- Willing to invest sizably for a near-lens-to-full-frame experience in a single body.
Closing Thoughts from the Field
The Pentax X-5 feels like a solid, enthusiastic entry to superzooms a decade ago - it’s a great beginner camera to explore wide focal ranges without complexity. However, for those of us who crave precision, speed, and far-reaching creative control, the Sony RX10 III stands as a powerhouse in the bridge camera category.
If you consistently shoot telephotos, need video versatility, or want the flexibility to grow as a photographer, the RX10 III pays for itself through sheer capability. The Pentax is a fun tool but ultimately leaves a lot on the table.
I hope this detailed side-by-side helps you clarify your priorities for your next photographic adventure. After all, the best camera is the one that inspires you to create - and now you have the insights to make that choice wisely.
If you have specific questions about handling, image quality in your favorite genre, or lens optimization techniques on these cameras, drop me a message. I’ve spent countless hours putting these cameras through their paces and love helping fellow photographers navigate the evolving landscape!
Happy shooting!
Pentax X-5 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
Pentax X-5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Pentax | Sony |
Model | Pentax X-5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2012-08-22 | 2016-03-29 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 22-580mm (26.4x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 230k dots | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 14.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 595 grams (1.31 pounds) | 1051 grams (2.32 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 86 x 107mm (4.7" x 3.4" x 4.2") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 472 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | 420 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $230 | $1,398 |