Pentax X-5 vs Sony WX50
65 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43


96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Pentax X-5 vs Sony WX50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-580mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 595g - 119 x 86 x 107mm
- Revealed August 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
- 117g - 92 x 52 x 19mm
- Released January 2012

Pentax X-5 vs Sony WX50: Which Compact Camera Wins Your Creative Heart?
Whether you’re stepping up from a smartphone or looking for a handy second shooter, choosing the right compact camera can feel like navigating a maze. Today, we’re diving deep into two popular 2012 models that embody different design philosophies and photographic ambitions: the Pentax X-5, a superzoom bridge camera with versatile reach, and the Sony Cyber-shot WX50, a sleek compact optimized for portability and ease of use.
With over 15 years of experience testing cameras across genres and scenarios, I’ll guide you through an expert comparison balancing solid technical analysis with everyday user insights. We’ll cover everything you need - from sensor tech and autofocus to real-world handling and genre-specific performance - so you can find your perfect fit.
First Impressions: Body Design and Handling
Your hands tell a big story about camera comfort and usability - so getting a feel for size, grip, and button layout is indispensable.
The Pentax X-5 is a bridge-style, SLR-like camera boasting a large 119x86x107 mm body and weighing about 595 grams. It has a pronounced grip and a tilting 3-inch screen that adds flexibility for creative angles. This design supports extended sessions and zoom-heavy shooting without compromising stability.
On the flip side, the Sony WX50 impresses with its ultra-compact size - just 92x52x19 mm and a weight of 117 grams. It slips easily into any pocket or bag, encouraging spontaneous shooting and street photography.
Key design takeaways:
Feature | Pentax X-5 | Sony WX50 |
---|---|---|
Body Type | Bridge (SLR-like) | Compact |
Dimensions (mm) | 119 x 86 x 107 | 92 x 52 x 19 |
Weight | 595 g | 117 g |
Screen | 3" Tilting LCD | 2.7" Fixed LCD |
Viewfinder | Electronic (230k dots) | None |
Grip | Pronounced, with good ergonomics | Minimal, slim body |
The X-5's larger body and dedicated viewfinder layout offer improved ergonomics for prolonged use, while the WX50 focuses on pocketability. If your workflow includes long zoom excursions or precise framing, the X-5 holds an ergonomic edge, but if stealth and convenience are paramount, the WX50 shines.
User Interface and Control Layout: Smooth Operation Matters
How controls are arranged directly impacts your shooting speed and creative flexibility. Pentax designs often cater to enthusiasts who like direct access to key functions, while Sony tends to favor simplicity in compacts.
Pentax X-5:
- Dedicated dials for shutter speed and aperture
- Easy access to exposure compensation, ISO, and drive mode
- Tilting screen complements the electronic viewfinder for flexible shooting angles
- No touchscreen, but a well-laid-out button set
Sony WX50:
- Minimalist control blurred towards point-and-shoot
- No manual exposure modes - full auto shooting only
- No viewfinder, hence fully dependent on the LCD
- Compact buttons designed for quick navigation but limited manual override
You’ll appreciate the X-5’s controls if you want to influence exposure creatively on the fly. The WX50 is more beginner-friendly but may frustrate experienced shooters who prefer direct manual input.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Peeking Under the Hood
Although both cameras feature the same 16MP 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS sensor size, their image results differ because of image processing, lens optics, and software controls.
Highlights:
Feature | Pentax X-5 | Sony WX50 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) |
Sensor Area | 27.72 mm² | 28.07 mm² |
Max Resolution | 16 MP (4608 x 3456) | 16 MP (4608 x 3456) |
ISO Range | 100 – 6400 | 100 – 12800 |
RAW Support | No | No |
Anti-Aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift (5-axis) | Optical lens stabilization |
Despite similar sensor specs, the X-5’s sensor-shift stabilization helps in shooting sharper images across the zoom range, especially in low light or slow shutter speeds. The WX50 offers optical stabilization but has a smaller zoom range and lower control over exposure, which can limit quality in challenging conditions.
Image quality notes based on tests:
- Both cameras produce respectable color fidelity out of the box.
- The X-5’s longer zoom and sensor-shift IS maintain better image clarity across focal lengths.
- Noise handling sees the WX50 excel at higher ISO values (up to ISO 12800), useful in low light.
- Neither camera supports RAW, meaning less flexibility during post-processing.
LCD Screens and Viewfinder Experience
A crucial part of your daily shooting is composing images comfortably. The X-5’s electronic viewfinder and tilting screen provide many framing options, whereas the WX50 relies solely on its fixed LCD.
- X-5: 3-inch 460k-dot tilting LCD + 230k-dot EVF - great for bright sunlight shooting and low angles.
- WX50: 2.7-inch 461k-dot fixed LCD - adequate indoors but limited for high or low angles.
With the X-5, you can switch between two viewing modes seamlessly, an advantage if you’re shooting outdoors or need stability. The WX50’s compact approach benefits travelers and casual shooters who prioritize simplicity.
Zoom and Lens Performance: Reach vs. Convenience
Arguably the most defining distinction is the lens and zoom capabilities.
Feature | Pentax X-5 | Sony WX50 |
---|---|---|
Focal Length Range | 22-580 mm (26x zoom equivalent) | 25-125 mm (5x zoom equivalent) |
Max Aperture Range | f/3.1 – f/5.9 | f/2.6 – f/6.3 |
Macro Focus Range | 1 cm | 5 cm |
The X-5’s 26x zoom offers massive reach rivaling entry-level DSLRs with telephoto lenses. This makes it an excellent tool for wildlife, sports, and landscape shooters who need versatility without carrying lenses.
In contrast, the WX50’s shorter zoom restricts telephoto shots but bright f/2.6 wide aperture lets in more light for low-light scenes or shallow depth of field when wide.
Autofocus System and Responsiveness
For critical shots like wildlife and sports, autofocus (AF) performance can make or break your experience.
Feature | Pentax X-5 | Sony WX50 |
---|---|---|
AF Points | 9 points (contrast detection) | Unknown (contrast detection) |
Face Detection | Yes | Yes |
Continuous AF | No | No |
AF Tracking | Yes (contrast detect only) | Yes |
Both cameras rely on contrast-detection autofocus, which generally trails phase-detection systems in speed. Neither supports continuous AF or eye/animal AF, which are features common in modern cameras but rare in 2012 compacts.
We found that the X-5’s AF is adequate for controlled action shots at longer zooms, but can hesitate in low light or fast movement. The WX50, geared more toward casual shooting, performs best with static subjects in good lighting.
Burst Shooting and Video Capabilities
If you’re shooting moving subjects or want smooth video, frame rate and video specs matter.
Feature | Pentax X-5 | Sony WX50 |
---|---|---|
Burst Rate | 10fps (JPEG) | 10fps (JPEG) |
Max Shutter Speed | 1/1500 sec | 1/1600 sec |
Video Max | 1080p 30fps (Motion JPEG) | 1080p 60fps (AVCHD, MPEG-4) |
Mic/Headphone | None | None |
Stabilization | Sensor-shift | Optical |
Though burst rates match on paper, the X-5’s buffer is limited and tends to slow down quickly, making it less ideal for prolonged sequences. The WX50 adds a slight advantage in video frame rate and recording efficiency through AVCHD and MPEG-4 codecs compared to the X-5’s MJPEG format.
Neither camera has microphone inputs, limiting audio quality potential for serious videographers. Stabilization on both helps smooth handheld footage.
Battery Life and Storage Flexibility
For travel and event days, battery endurance can govern how much you capture.
Feature | Pentax X-5 | Sony WX50 |
---|---|---|
Battery Type | 4x AA batteries | Rechargeable NP-BN lithium-ion |
Battery Life | ~330 shots per charge | ~240 shots per charge |
Storage Media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick |
The X-5’s use of AA batteries is a double-edged sword: it makes replacing batteries on the go easier (grab local alkalines) but adds weight. The WX50’s proprietary Li-ion battery delivers reasonable life but means you must keep charging equipment handy.
The WX50 has the edge in storage flexibility, supporting Sony’s Memory Stick line alongside SD cards.
Durability and Weather Resistance
Neither camera offers environmental sealing, splash, dust, or shock protection, limiting outdoor professional use in challenging conditions. If you plan serious adventure photography, adding third-party protective gear or considering rugged models would be wise.
Real-World Use Across Photography Genres
Time to explore how each camera fares in specific fields, enabling you to match strengths and weaknesses with your creative goals.
Portrait Photography
- Pentax X-5: Long zoom can isolate subjects with background blur at telephoto focal lengths, but max aperture limitations reduce bokeh quality. 9 AF points with face detection help focus accuracy but no eye-detection limits pinpoint sharpness on eyes.
- Sony WX50: Faster wide aperture (f/2.6) creates better shallow depth effects at wide angle but limited zoom restricts compression possibilities. Face detection effective but similar AF constraints apply.
Winner: Slight edge to WX50 for portraits thanks to aperture and compact design, but neither offers pro-grade blur control.
Landscape Photography
- X-5: Wide zoom start at 22mm equivalent lets you capture expansive vistas. Tilting screen and EVF help compose in tough angles. Sensor-shift IS stabilizes for handheld shots. However, small sensor limits dynamic range.
- WX50: Limited wide end at 25mm and fixed LCD is less flexible. Better ISO range helps low-light scenes but smaller zoom inhibits framing creativity.
Winner: X-5 edges out for landscapes due to zoom versatility and viewfinder.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
- X-5: Massive 26x zoom invaluable. 10fps burst without continuous AF limits tracking fast action but reasonable for beginners.
- WX50: Short zoom and basic AF less capable for distant moving subjects.
Winner: Pentax X-5 is hands down better suited for wildlife and sports.
Street Photography
- X-5: Bulkier size might draw attention; slower AF response a drawback.
- WX50: Compactness and quiet operation make it natural for candid moments.
Winner: Sony WX50 is ideal for street shooting.
Macro Photography
- X-5: Macro focus as close as 1 cm - impressive for ultra-close shots. Sensor-shift stabilization aids sharpness.
- WX50: Macro starts at 5 cm, more limited but sufficient for casual use.
Winner: Pentax X-5 for true close-ups.
Night and Astrophotography
- Neither camera supports manual ISO going very high nor RAW shooting, essential for astrophotography.
- WX50 supports ISO 12800 but often noisy.
- X-5 better handled stabilized handheld night shots with sensor-shift IS.
Winner: Marginal - X-5 offers better stabilization but neither is ideal for dedicated night shooting.
Video Recording
- Sony WX50 supports 1080p at 60fps with efficient codecs, producing smoother, better quality video.
- Pentax X-5 restricts 1080p to 30fps with MJPEG, larger files, and lower efficiency.
Winner: Sony WX50 for video creators.
Travel Photography
- X-5: Bulk and weight pose challenges for long treks but zoom versatility supports wide-ranging subjects.
- WX50: Ultra-compact, lightweight for all-day carry, easier for urban exploration.
Winner: Sony WX50 for travel convenience.
Sample Image Comparisons: Real-World Picture Quality
See for yourself the differences these cameras deliver. Below are images captured side by side under varied conditions - outdoor daylight, indoor low light, telephoto shots, and macro.
Highlights:
- The X-5’s longer zoom delivers better reach and subject isolation.
- WX50 produces cleaner images at higher ISO but softer details on zoom.
- Color reproduction is comparable, with slight vibrancy advantage to Sony.
- Macro shots show clearer fine detail from the X-5.
Summary Table: Key Scores and Performance Ratings
Integrating lab benchmarks, user experience, and our testing feedback, the overall grades supplement your decision-making.
Category | Pentax X-5 | Sony WX50 |
---|---|---|
Image Quality | Good | Good |
Zoom Range | Excellent | Moderate |
AF Performance | Average | Average |
Handling/Ergonomics | Very Good | Good |
Video Quality | Average | Very Good |
Battery Life | Good | Average |
Portability | Fair | Excellent |
Deep Dive: How Each Camera Excels Across Photography Types
Let’s break down genre scores with a sharp lens on real-world needs.
Photography Genre | Pentax X-5 | Sony WX50 | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Portrait | Good | Good | Penalty on bokeh for both |
Landscape | Very Good | Fair | Zoom vs. portability |
Wildlife | Very Good | Fair | Zoom and AF focus |
Sports | Good | Fair | Burst and AF |
Street | Fair | Very Good | Size and stealth |
Macro | Very Good | Good | Close focus distance |
Night / Astro | Fair | Fair | ISO limits & no RAW |
Video | Fair | Very Good | Frame rates and codecs |
Travel | Fair | Very Good | Size, weight, battery |
Professional Use | Fair | Fair | No RAW, no weather sealing |
Concluding Recommendations: Which Camera Should You Choose?
Choose the Pentax X-5 if:
- You want maximum zoom reach for wildlife, sports, or landscape.
- You prefer more manual control, like shutter/aperture dials.
- You appreciate a built-in EVF and a tilting screen.
- You want to experiment with macro close-ups.
- You don’t mind a larger, heavier body and AA batteries.
- You shoot mostly still photos and value stabilization.
Choose the Sony WX50 if:
- You want a truly pocketable, lightweight travel companion.
- You prefer hassle-free, fully automatic shooting with quality outcomes.
- You want better video capabilities with 60 fps 1080p recording.
- You want longer battery life in a dedicated rechargeable package.
- You shoot mainly in good light, candid, or street photography.
- You value speed and simplicity over manual controls.
Final Words: Try Before You Buy and Accessorize Smartly
Both these cameras serve different creative roles - a superzoom enthusiast’s toolbox versus a nimble everyday shooter’s sidekick. Neither is cutting-edge by 2024 standards but remain relevant for budget-conscious beginners or collectors.
If possible, get hands-on with each model to feel the size, controls, and viewfinder differences. See which matches your style and project goals best.
To get the most out of your chosen camera, consider investing in:
- Spare batteries or battery chargers
- UV and ND filters (especially for the X-5)
- A sturdy camera bag or strap for comfort
- SD cards rated for video if shooting WX50 footage
- Mini tripods or gorilla pods for stabilized night shots
Finding the right camera is about balancing your eye’s needs with your hand’s comfort and your creative ambitions. With this detailed comparison, we hope you are better equipped to make an informed choice that inspires your next photographic adventure. Happy shooting!
Pentax X-5 vs Sony WX50 Specifications
Pentax X-5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Pentax | Sony |
Model | Pentax X-5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-08-22 | 2012-01-30 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 22-580mm (26.4x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.6-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 461 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | Clearfoto TFT LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 230 thousand dot | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m | 5.30 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 595 grams (1.31 pounds) | 117 grams (0.26 pounds) |
Dimensions | 119 x 86 x 107mm (4.7" x 3.4" x 4.2") | 92 x 52 x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 240 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $230 | $250 |