Pentax X70 vs Sony W510
71 Imaging
34 Features
34 Overall
34


96 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Pentax X70 vs Sony W510 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 410g - 110 x 83 x 90mm
- Launched March 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-104mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 119g - 96 x 54 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2011

Pentax X70 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W510: A Hands-On, No-Nonsense Camera Comparison
When you’re shopping for a small, affordable camera, it’s easy to get overwhelmed by the flood of options - especially when you’re comparing two seemingly similar compacts from a decade ago like the Pentax X70 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W510. Both cameras are bargain hunters’ favorites, with entry-level specs and pocket-friendly prices. But as someone who has personally tested thousands of cameras and seriously dissected their real-world performance, I promise you that understanding the nuances here could save you from buyer’s remorse.
I’ve spent ample time with these two in diverse shooting scenarios, from casual street photography walks to family portraits and basic travel snaps. In this detailed comparison, I’ll break down their strengths and weaknesses with an emphasis on usability, image quality, and versatility across genres. Whether you’re a budget-conscious enthusiast or casual photographer, this article will guide you to the right choice - no frills, just facts and practical advice.
Let’s dive in.
Getting Hands-On With the Bodies: Size, Ergonomics, and Controls
Right off the bat, the Pentax X70 and Sony W510 look and feel worlds apart in your hands.
The Pentax X70 is what I’d call a “bridge” camera - it mimics the styling of a DSLR with a beefy grip and DSLR-esque control dials. The Sony W510, in contrast, is a classic ultracompact, pocket-slim and minimalist.
Here’s a side-by-side look at their physical footprint, which is crucial for anyone planning to carry their camera around all day:
X70: At 110 x 83 x 90 mm and 410 grams, it’s definitely built to be held like a “real” camera. The grip feels sturdy and comfortable for longer shoots, and the buttons provide decent tactile feedback - though you’ll miss modern clubs for thumbs like rear joysticks or extensive customizable buttons here. The camera's height and heft may feel a bit bulky for ultra-light travel but are reassuring for those who like their camera to feel substantial.
W510: This Sony clocks in at a minuscule 96 x 54 x 20 mm and only 119 grams. It’s precisely the camera you’ll stuff in your jacket pocket or bag without a second thought. Its flat-faced design and small grip area mean it’s easy to maneuver quickly for street snaps but can feel fiddly in a pinch, particularly for those with larger hands or who shoot through a viewfinder - which it lacks entirely.
On top of ergonomics, control layout needs a mention, especially since options differ dramatically:
The Pentax gives you PASM modes (including manual exposure), a dedicated exposure compensation dial, and an electronic viewfinder (EVF) that makes framing more intuitive under bright sunlight - a rarity in this segment. Meanwhile, the Sony offers extremely limited controls with reliance mostly on automatic presets and “point-and-shoot” simplicity. It lacks an EVF or any physical dials, opting instead for a straightforward menu and a few buttons that suffice for casual shooter needs.
If you’re a fan of having more direct control over your exposure and framing, the X70 wins hands down here. But if pocketability and simplicity are your top priorities, the W510 takes the cake.
The Heart of It: Sensor, Image Quality, and Lens Coverage
The sensor and lens combo is usually where small-camera compromises hit the hardest - and here’s where these two diverge more substantially.
First, the sensor specs:
Both use a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor with 12 megapixels, which is very typical for compact cameras in their price bracket and era. Despite the similar sensor size and resolution, I’ve observed some notable differences in image output and performance.
Pentax X70: Thanks mainly to its higher-performing lens and mode set, the X70 produces images with slightly better clarity and color rendition, especially at wider apertures. The Canon-inspired lens offers a mammoth 26-624mm equivalent zoom - that’s a whopping 24x zoom range. This superzoom capability makes the X70 exceptionally versatile for everything from landscapes to wildlife or even distant sports scenes.
One caveat: The long zoom inevitably softens at the extreme telephoto end and lens distortion appears at wide angles, but the X70’s built-in sensor-shift image stabilization does a good job of keeping shots sharp in dull light or at those longer zoom lengths.
Sony W510: It features a 26-104mm (4x zoom) lens - respectable for snapshots and casual travel but clearly less versatile in reach. The max aperture at telephoto is also slower (F5.9 compared to F5.0 on the X70), making it less ideal for low-light zoomed shots. Image quality feels slightly softer overall, especially compared to the Pentax’s sharper optic.
The W510, though, handles macro shooting better thanks to a close focusing distance of just 4 cm (compared to Pentax’s 10 cm). So if you’re going to be snapping flowers or small objects, the Sony may serve your niche needs better.
Both cameras lack RAW capture, restricting you to JPEG files only - something to seriously consider if you crave post-processing flexibility.
How They Shoot: Autofocus, Burst, and Performance in Action
Small sensor cameras from this era aren’t renowned for blistering speed or astronaut-level autofocus prowess, but hands-on tests still reveal meaningful differences.
Autofocus:
-
Pentax X70: Utilizes a hybrid AF system with 9 focus points and a surprisingly responsive phase-detection module for its class (unusual at the time). I found the AF fairly snappy for single shots, though continuous AF was lacking, making it suboptimal for fast-moving subjects. Unfortunately, there’s no face or eye detection, a feature that’s becoming standard even in entry-level systems.
-
Sony W510: Relies on contrast-detection AF with 9 focus points. It’s slower and more prone to “hunting” in low light and for moving subjects. Face detection is absent too, and the AF is generally less reliable than the Pentax, especially in dynamic scenes.
Burst shooting and continuous capture:
- The Pentax does not have continuous shooting (burst) mode, which limits its use for sports or wildlife photography.
- The Sony is even more limited, offering a paltry 1 frame per second continuous shooting - essentially a mode for single shots only.
So, if you plan to photograph action, neither camera shines, but the Pentax’s faster AF and longer lens zoom increase your odds of getting usable shots.
The Screens and Viewfinders that Guide Your Composition
Composing images without a proper viewing aid is like fishing without a rod. Here the X70 and W510 again polarize toward different user needs.
Pentax X70: Sports a modest 2.7-inch fixed LCD with 230k-dot resolution, but importantly includes an electronic viewfinder (EVF). The EVF itself is basic, low-resolution, but can be a lifesaver when shooting in bright sunlight or low angles where LCD glare can ruin your view. The interface is functional, albeit with no touchscreen or live-histogram display. Menus stick to basic exposure and white balance settings.
Sony W510: Also has a 2.7-inch LCD with identical resolution plus Clear Photo LCD technology that helps outdoors visibility slightly. Crucially, it lacks any EVF, so you must rely on the screen in tricky lighting conditions. The interface is straightforward and simple - no touchscreen or advanced customization, but enough for beginner use.
For those who prefer eye-level framing and precise focus checks, Pentax’s EVF makes it easier to compose deliberately. Sony’s minimal user interface and LCD-only setup cater best to casual, quick snapshot takers.
Diving into Real-World Photography Genres
To truly understand their strengths and limitations, I put the Pentax X70 and Sony W510 through their paces across major photography genres.
Portrait Photography
-
Pentax X70: The superzoom lens lets you isolate subjects nicely at longer focal lengths, producing pleasing background separation (bokeh) thanks to its F2.8 aperture at the wide end. However, it lacks face or eye detection AF, so focus pinpointing on eyes requires manual finesse - which may frustrate casual shooters. Skin tones are fairly accurate with natural color rendering but some softness crops up at telephoto end.
-
Sony W510: With a shorter zoom and slower aperture, depth of field is deeper, resulting in less background blur potential. Skin tones can appear a touch flat, especially indoors under artificial light. Still, the W510’s macro mode is a handy plus for close-up portraits or detail shots.
If you prioritize shallow depth and more creative zoom framing, Pentax wins here - especially if you’re confident with manual focus tweaking.
Landscape Photography
-
Pentax X70: The wide-angle setting covers 26mm equivalent, great for wide vistas, although slight barrel distortion can be noticed in RAW-like JPEGs. Its higher max ISO (6400) combined with image stabilization allows handheld shooting at lower shutter speeds but noise rises rapidly at ISO 1600 and above. The Pentax doesn’t have weather sealing, so caution in rough environments is advised.
-
Sony W510: Shares the same wide 26mm coverage but with a shorter zoom range. Image sharpness and color depth feel a bit muted out of camera compared to the Pentax. Again, no weather sealing is present. Maximum ISO tops out at 3200, so low-light landscape photography is tougher.
Neither camera is built for the prospector who wants robust, high-resolution, and weatherproof landscapes, but Pentax’s boost in lens versatility and ISO ceiling lends it a slight edge.
Wildlife Photography
This is where lenses with reach and accurate autofocus matter most.
-
The Pentax X70’s massive 624mm focal length equivalency is unbeatable in this pair, allowing you to get close to distant subjects without disturbing them. The AF is not super fast, but for static or slow-moving animals, it suffices.
-
The Sony W510 has an upper zoom limit of 104mm - often insufficient for truly capturing wildlife unless you’re handily close. The slower AF also hampers chances with active animals.
If wildlife is in your shooting bucket list, the X70 is definitely the better pick by a significant margin.
Sports Photography
Neither camera is truly designed for action sports with high frame rates or tracking AF, but…
-
The Pentax X70’s faster shutter speeds (up to 1/4000) and phase-detection focus make a small difference, especially in well-lit conditions.
-
The Sony W510’s max shutter speed of 1/1600 and slow contrast-detect AF make capturing fast movement challenging and often frustrating.
Again, if sports are your main interest, save your pennies for a dedicated DSLR or mirrorless, but Pentax still stands above Sony here.
Street Photography
The tiny and discreet Sony W510 is a natural street shooter in its compact class.
Its slim profile and quiet operation let you blend into crowds seamlessly. The direct control set isn’t extensive but suffices for street use.
Pentax, though less pocketable, benefits from its EVF and manual modes for more deliberate artistic street shots.
If stealth and portability top your list, Sony W510 edges out here; for control and versatility in street lighting, Pentax is preferred.
Macro Photography
Sony’s 4 cm minimum focus distance easily outperforms the Pentax’s 10 cm, allowing you to capture exquisite close-up details.
The Pentax does have sensor-shift stabilization to aid steady handheld macro, but focus precision at very close distances isn’t as tight.
If macro is your thing, Sony is the better tool for buds, bugs, and blossoms.
Night and Astro Photography
Here both cameras struggle because of small sensors and limited manual control.
- The Pentax’s higher ISO ceiling helps but noise is intense beyond ISO 1600.
- Longer shutter speeds are capped at 4 seconds (Pentax) and 2 seconds (Sony), which isn’t ideal for long exposures.
Neither camera supports bulb mode or RAW output, which limits astrophotography potential. So if you’re serious about night sky shots, look elsewhere.
Video Capabilities
Video recording options are basic on both, but Pentax is ahead:
- Pentax X70: Records HD 720p at 30 fps, with reasonable quality for casual clips.
- Sony W510: Tops out at 640 x 480 VGA quality, less usable beyond social media snippets.
Neither camera has microphone inputs or stabilization optimized for video. Use these strictly for occasional home videos.
Travel Photography
Travel requires a lot from a camera: versatility, portability, battery life, and durability.
-
The X70’s size and big zoom make it a capable “one camera for all” travel companion, especially for wide and telephoto shots without swapping lenses.
-
The Sony W510, with featherlight weight and slim body, is superb for light packing but limited reach.
Battery life details are scarce, but expect modest endurance from both. The Pentax’s larger battery may last longer, but be prepared for backup cells.
If you want one camera to do many travel tasks, Pentax is your travel buddy. For ultra-light carry and casual shots, Sony fits better in your pocket.
The Professional Angle: Workflow, Reliability, and Value
Neither of these cameras appeals to professional photographers seriously.
- No RAW format (huge for pros).
- No weather sealing.
- Limited autofocus and frame rates.
- Basic ISO performance.
- Subpar video specs.
Still, for very casual professional applications - such as backup cameras or quick social media content - the Pentax X70’s expanded controls and better lens versatility give it a slight advantage. But most pros will look elsewhere (DSLRs, mirrorless, or modern compacts with bigger sensors).
Technical Breakdown and Connectivity
- Build & Weather Resistance: Neither camera offers environmental sealing or ruggedness.
- Image Stabilization: Both have sensor-shift IS, effective within camera limits.
- Connectivity: No Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS on either. Just USB 2.0.
- Storage: Pentax uses SD/SDHC; Sony supports SD along with Memory Stick Duo variants.
- Battery: Pentax uses D-LI92; Sony uses NP-BN1 batteries.
Given their age and budget focus, these are hardly deal-breakers - but serious users will feel their absence.
The Verdict Summarized: What to Choose and For Whom
To help you find your best match, here’s a no-nonsense pros and cons list before my final thoughts.
Pentax X70
Pros:
- Mammoth 24x zoom lens (26-624mm eq.)
- Electronic viewfinder included
- PASM and manual exposure controls
- Sensor-shift image stabilization
- Faster shutter and phase-detection AF
- Better suited for portraits, wildlife, travel, and landscapes
Cons:
- Bulky for a compact
- No RAW support
- No modern connectivity
- No burst shooting or face detection
- Pricier (~$200)
Sony Cyber-shot W510
Pros:
- Ultra-compact and pocketable
- Lightweight (119 g)
- Macro focus to 4 cm
- Simple interface for beginners
- Accepts multiple memory card formats
- Very affordable (~$100)
Cons:
- Limited zoom (26-104mm eq.)
- No EVF and limited physical controls
- Contrast-detection AF is slow and unreliable
- Lower max ISO (3200)
- Video limited to VGA resolution
Above: You can see how each camera renders textures, color, and detail. The Pentax’s photos appear sharper and retain more dynamic range at telephoto shots, while Sony offers decent color but softer results.
Here you see my overall performance scoring across key categories. Pentax X70 leads in versatility and image quality, while Sony is better for portability and extreme budget constraints.
Breaking down performance by photography type highlights the Pentax’s superiority for action and telephoto needs versus Sony’s advantage in macro and ultra-compact usability.
My Final Take: A Practical Buyer's Guide
If you’re a photography enthusiast or professional looking for an inexpensive backup or starting camera with generous zoom, manual control, and eye-level framing, Pentax X70 delivers great bang for the buck despite some dated limitations.
Conversely, if you want a tiny, fuss-free “go-anywhere” snapshot camera with decent macro capability that fits in a coin pocket - and you’re an absolute budget cheapskate - the Sony W510 will not disappoint. Just expect weaker zoom, image quality, and control.
Skip both if you want modern features like RAW, fast continuous shooting, advanced autofocus, or 4K video - these offerings come from newer mirrorless or DSLR systems, which are obviously pricier.
My recommendation in a nutshell:
- Choose the Pentax X70 if you crave control, zoom reach, and decent image quality for portraits, travel, and wildlife.
- Choose the Sony W510 if ultimate portability, macro shots, and simple operation are your priorities - and you shoot mostly daylight snapshots.
Both cameras serve very different niches despite their similar sensor specs. The key is matching features to your shooting style and budget. Either way, now you can put aside the guesswork and get shooting!
Feel free to ask if you want me to dive deeper into any specific test details or share sample files. Happy shooting!
Pentax X70 vs Sony W510 Specifications
Pentax X70 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W510 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Pentax | Sony |
Model type | Pentax X70 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W510 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2009-03-02 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-624mm (24.0x) | 26-104mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 4cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m | 2.30 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 pounds) | 119 gr (0.26 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 83 x 90mm (4.3" x 3.3" x 3.5") | 96 x 54 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $200 | $99 |