Pentax XG-1 vs Sony A35
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fcb78/fcb78625b9bfd044138fde17449eb98eea8ef3dd" alt="Pentax XG-1 front Pentax XG-1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a4a1/1a4a1e9ae5851412bf5c0adc402e8817737aa48f" alt="Sony SLT-A35 front Sony SLT-A35 front"
69 Imaging
56 Features
70 Overall
61
Pentax XG-1 vs Sony A35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1248mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 567g - 119 x 89 x 98mm
- Announced July 2014
(Full Review)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Pentax XG-1 vs Sony A35 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Pentax XG-1 versus Sony A35, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Pentax and Sony. The image resolution of the XG-1 (16MP) and the A35 (16MP) is pretty well matched but the XG-1 (1/2.3") and A35 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The XG-1 was manufactured 2 years later than the A35 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Pentax XG-1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony A35 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the XG-1 matches up vs the A35 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Pentax XG-1 vs Sony A35 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax XG-1 & Sony SLT-A35. The entire galleries are viewable at Pentax XG-1 Gallery & Sony A35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax XG-1 over the Sony A35
XG-1 | A35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2014 | ![]() | September 2011 | More recent by 35 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A35 over the Pentax XG-1
A35 | XG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax XG-1 and Sony A35
XG-1 | A35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Pentax XG-1 vs Sony A35 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Pentax XG-1 provides external dimensions of 119mm x 89mm x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) whilst the Sony A35 has dimensions of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") having a weight of 415 grams (0.91 lbs).
Contrast the Pentax XG-1 versus Sony A35 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the XG-1 vs the A35.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14265/1426573a1a8a81dba921352dcd8023303da5d415" alt="Pentax XG-1 vs Sony A35 size comparison Pentax XG-1 vs Sony A35 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XG-1 and A35 is 66 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2467c/2467c496bd5b30b644f5fbec5b3103d162fc884c" alt="Pentax XG-1 vs Sony A35 top view buttons comparison Pentax XG-1 vs Sony A35 top view buttons comparison"
Pentax XG-1 vs Sony A35 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements merely by checking technical specs. The graphic below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the XG-1 and A35.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have got the exact same megapixel count albeit different sensor measurements. The XG-1 features the tinier sensor which should make getting shallow depth of field tougher. The more recent XG-1 should have an advantage in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2cba4/2cba4c0bc7db63edc02c0d7e1298b4c718c2f88b" alt="Pentax XG-1 vs Sony A35 sensor size comparison Pentax XG-1 vs Sony A35 sensor size comparison"
Pentax XG-1 vs Sony A35 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/083cb/083cbc2b11f7df2662f115f19e4a4aaefd5fd9e9" alt="Pentax XG-1 vs Sony A35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax XG-1 vs Sony A35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Pentax XG-1 vs Sony A35 Specifications
Pentax XG-1 | Sony SLT-A35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Pentax | Sony |
Model | Pentax XG-1 | Sony SLT-A35 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2014-07-15 | 2011-09-20 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 15 |
Cross focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 24-1248mm (52.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 200k dot | 1,150k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 9.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m | 12.00 m |
Flash settings | Force Off, Flash Auto, Force Flash, Slow Sync., Slow Sync. + Red-Eye, Red-Eye Reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 567g (1.25 pounds) | 415g (0.91 pounds) |
Dimensions | 119 x 89 x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 763 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | 440 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LB-060 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $599 | $598 |