Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung CL80
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
95 Imaging
37 Features
30 Overall
34
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Alternative Name is ST5500
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung CL80 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung CL80, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and CL80 (14MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe CX1 was introduced 10 months before the CL80 so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the CX1 matches up against the CL80 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung CL80 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX1 & Samsung CL80. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh CX1 Gallery & Samsung CL80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Samsung CL80
| CX1 | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Ricoh CX1
| CL80 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2010 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 10 months |
| Screen dimension | 3.7" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.7") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung CL80
| CX1 | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX1 provides exterior dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Samsung CL80 has sizing of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung CL80 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the CX1 against the CL80.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the CX1 and CL80 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to see the gap between sensor measurements only by checking specifications. The graphic below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the CX1 and CL80.
Plainly, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Samsung CL80 to give you extra detail using its extra 5MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The older CX1 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung CL80 Specifications
| Ricoh CX1 | Samsung CL80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh CX1 | Samsung CL80 |
| Otherwise known as | - | ST5500 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2009-02-19 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 4800 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.2 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3.7" |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 180 gr (0.40 lb) | 160 gr (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | DB-70 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $299 | $400 |
