Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony H400
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony H400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Released February 2014
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony H400 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Sony H400, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and H400 (20MP) but they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TG-2 iHS was unveiled 7 months before the H400 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony H400 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the TG-2 iHS scores versus the H400 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony H400 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Sony H400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Sony H400
TG-2 iHS | H400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 610k | 460k | Clearer screen (+150k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony H400 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
H400 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | June 2013 | Newer by 7 months |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony H400
TG-2 iHS | H400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony H400 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS features outside measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sony H400 has dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") accompanied by a weight of 628 grams (1.38 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Sony H400 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-2 iHS compared to the H400.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-2 iHS and H400 is 91 and 62 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony H400 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by viewing technical specs. The picture underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-2 iHS and H400.
As you have seen, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can count on the Sony H400 to render greater detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged TG-2 iHS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony H400 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony H400 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-06-28 | 2014-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz(R) |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5152 x 3864 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-1550mm (62.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.4-6.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 610 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | OLED | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 201 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 8.80 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 X 720 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230g (0.51 lb) | 628g (1.38 lb) |
Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 300 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $380 | $268 |