Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung HZ35W
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Launched February 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
- Also referred to as WB650
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung HZ35W, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and HZ35W (12MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe CX1 was introduced 16 months before the HZ35W which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the CX1 matches up against the HZ35W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX1 & Samsung HZ35W. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh CX1 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Samsung HZ35W
| CX1 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 614k | Sharper screen (+306k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Ricoh CX1
| HZ35W | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2010 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 16 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung HZ35W
| CX1 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX1 enjoys exterior measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung HZ35W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the CX1 against the HZ35W.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX1 and HZ35W is 93 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes simply by checking technical specs. The image underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the CX1 and HZ35W.
As you have seen, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can count on the Samsung HZ35W to give extra detail using its extra 3MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged CX1 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Ricoh CX1 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh CX1 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Alternative name | - | WB650 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-02-19 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.2 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 920k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 180g (0.40 lbs) | 245g (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | DB-70 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $299 | $300 |
