Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung TL500
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Launched February 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Announced July 2010
- Alternate Name is EX1
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
Below is a in depth overview of the Ricoh CX1 versus Samsung TL500, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the CX1 (9MP) and the TL500 (10MP) is pretty close but the CX1 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe CX1 was manufactured 16 months prior to the TL500 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the CX1 grades against the TL500 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX1 and Samsung TL500. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh CX1 Gallery and Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Samsung TL500
CX1 | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 614k | Clearer screen (+306k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Ricoh CX1
TL500 | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2010 | February 2009 | More recent by 16 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung TL500
CX1 | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX1 has got outside dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Samsung TL500 has measurements of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh CX1 versus Samsung TL500 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the CX1 compared to the TL500.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the CX1 and TL500 is 93 and 88 respectively.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements merely by viewing specifications. The graphic here may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX1 and TL500.
Plainly, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The CX1 due to its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Samsung TL500 will provide you with greater detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The older CX1 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
Ricoh CX1 | Samsung TL500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh CX1 | Samsung TL500 |
Alternative name | - | EX1 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-02-19 | 2010-07-09 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.2 | f/1.8-2.4 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 5.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 180 grams (0.40 lbs) | 386 grams (0.85 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 40 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 129 |
Other | ||
Battery model | DB-70 | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $299 | $527 |