Clicky

Ricoh CX1 vs Sigma DP2

Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
30
Overall
31
Ricoh CX1 front
 
Sigma DP2 front
Portability
86
Imaging
43
Features
28
Overall
37

Ricoh CX1 vs Sigma DP2 Key Specs

Ricoh CX1
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
  • Released February 2009
Sigma DP2
(Full Review)
  • 5MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 320 x 240 video
  • 41mm (F) lens
  • 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
  • Revealed September 2009
  • Refreshed by Sigma DP2s
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh CX1 vs Sigma DP2: A Deep Dive Into Compact Camera Excellence

When exploring compact cameras from around 2009, the Ricoh CX1 and Sigma DP2 stand out as two very different approaches to image capture technology. Although both are small sensor compacts, their design philosophies, sensor technologies, and real-world applications diverge considerably. Whether you're a seasoned photographer or a passionate enthusiast considering a unique addition to your gear bag, understanding how these two cameras stack up will help you make an informed decision.

In this detailed comparison, we'll dissect their capabilities across multiple photography genres, offer technical analysis, and provide practical recommendations tailored to your creative needs. Our insights come from extensive hands-on evaluations, sensor tests, and image quality assessments, giving you a reliable perspective grounded in experience.

Getting to Know the Players: Ricoh CX1 and Sigma DP2

Before jumping into detailed analysis, it’s essential to contextualize both cameras in terms of their physical designs, key specs, and intended user base.

Feature Ricoh CX1 Sigma DP2
Release Date February 2009 September 2009
Sensor Size 1/2.3” CMOS (6.17 x 4.55 mm) APS-C Foveon X3 (20.7 x 13.8 mm)
Sensor Resolution 9 MP 5 MP (Foveon layers, detailed color info)
Lens 28–200mm equiv. (7.1x zoom) 41mm fixed (prime)
Max Aperture f/3.3–5.2 f/2.8
Image Stabilization Sensor-shift stabilization None
Video Capability 640 x 480 (30 fps) 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Manual Controls Limited (no aperture or shutter priority) Full manual (shutter/aperture priority, manual modes)
Raw Support No Yes
Weight 180 g 280 g
Dimensions (mm) 102 x 58 x 28 113 x 60 x 56
Price (launch) ~$299 ~$649

Ricoh CX1 vs Sigma DP2 size comparison

Right away, you see how the Ricoh CX1 aims for versatility in a sleek, lightweight body with an extensive zoom range, whereas the Sigma DP2 is a larger, more deliberate tool with a premium APS-C sensor optimized for image quality rather than zoom flexibility.

Sensor Technologies and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

The sensor choice dramatically influences photographic possibilities and final image quality. These cameras highlight two distinct strategies.

Ricoh CX1’s 1/2.3" CMOS – Versatile but Compact

Ricoh chose a relatively small 1/2.3” sensor, common in compact cameras. At 9 megapixels, it offers decent resolution for prints up to 8x10 inches or moderate cropping.

Strengths:

  • CMOS tech allows for faster readout, enabling video capture and live view.
  • Sensor-shift image stabilization helps offset handshake for sharper handheld shots.
  • The small sensor supports a wide zoom range (28-200mm equivalent), making the CX1 adaptable to various shooting scenarios.

Limitations:

  • The sensor’s small size inherently limits low-light performance and dynamic range.
  • Noise becomes noticeable above ISO 400, capping usability in dim conditions.
  • No raw image output restricts post-processing flexibility.

Sigma DP2’s APS-C Foveon X3 Sensor – Quality Over Quantity

The Sigma DP2 uses its signature Foveon X3 sensor, measuring APS-C size - the same class favored by many DSLRs - with a unique layered design capturing full color data per pixel.

Highlights:

  • Larger sensor area (~285.7 mm²) compared to CX1’s 28.1 mm² dramatically improves image quality, noise control, and dynamic range.
  • The Foveon sensor excels at color fidelity and fine detail reproduction, especially in well-lit conditions.
  • Raw file support allows comprehensive post-processing.

Trade-Offs:

  • Limited resolution: The DP2 delivers 5 MP, but effective detail can rival some higher-count sensors thanks to layered color data.
  • Higher minimum ISO (200) restricts flexibility in extremely low light.
  • No image stabilization demands a steadier hand or tripod for sharp images.

Ricoh CX1 vs Sigma DP2 sensor size comparison

Ergonomics and Design: How These Cameras Feel to Use

Handling can make or break your shooting experience, especially when working over long hours or in challenging conditions.

Ricoh CX1 – Lightweight and Compact Convenience

  • Weight: 180 grams, easy to slip into any pocket.
  • Sleek body with a modest 3-inch fixed LCD screen (920k dots) [back-screen.jpg].
  • Controls support basic manual focus, but no aperture/shutter priority modes.
  • No viewfinder, requiring reliance on the LCD in bright outdoor situations.
  • Battery type: DB-70, offering moderate shooting endurance.

Sigma DP2 – Heftier, More Purposeful

  • Weight: 280 grams with a more substantial grip and 56 mm thickness.
  • Smaller 2.5-inch LCD panel at 230k dots - less sharp and less easy to view in sunlight.
  • Supports full manual exposure control and aperture/shutter priority.
  • No viewfinder, like the CX1; however, build quality feels robust for more serious, deliberate work.

Ricoh CX1 vs Sigma DP2 top view buttons comparison

Both cameras lack weather sealing, dustproofing, or ruggedness features, restricting them primarily to fair-weather shooting unless careful precautions are taken.

Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Speed vs Precision

Understanding autofocus (AF) behavior is essential depending on your photography style.

Feature Ricoh CX1 Sigma DP2
Autofocus System Contrast detect, single focus Contrast detect, single focus
Continuous AF No No
Face Detection No No
AF Speed Moderate Slower, deliberate focus
Burst Shooting Not available 3 fps
  • The Ricoh CX1 offers a quick contrast-detection AF system, effective for everyday shooting and casual snapshots.
  • The Sigma DP2 emphasizes precision over speed with a slower, contrast-based focus, appropriate for static subjects and careful compositions.

If you shoot fast-moving subjects or require continuous tracking - for example, wildlife or sports - the CX1’s autofocus is more forgiving but still limited. Neither camera excels in burst performance or AF tracking compared to modern mirrorless or DSLR cameras.

Exploring Genre-Specific Uses

To help you grasp how these cameras perform across photography genres, we’ll break down their strengths and limitations.

Portrait Photography

  • Ricoh CX1: The variable zoom helps you frame subjects creatively from wide environmental portraits to close-ups. Sensor-shift stabilization aids handheld shooting. The wide aperture range is modest, limiting bokeh separation. No face detection or eye AF affects autofocus reliability on faces.

  • Sigma DP2: Fixed 41mm lens with f/2.8 aperture yields crisp portraits with smooth background separation, thanks to the larger sensor. Raw capability means you can finesse skin tones and color profiles more expertly. Manual controls allow precise exposure and focus control to highlight eyes and facial details.

Landscape Photography

  • Ricoh CX1: Zoom flexibility (28-200 mm) permits framing of various landscapes. However, smaller sensor size limits dynamic range, risking highlight clipping and shadow noise in challenging lighting. Built-in sensor stabilization is helpful but no weather sealing restricts outdoor durability.

  • Sigma DP2: Larger APS-C Foveon sensor shines here, delivering stunning color accuracy and detail in scenes with high contrast. Manual exposure controls and raw files enable creative dynamic range blending during post. The prime lens limits framing freedom but compels precise composition.

Wildlife Photography

Neither camera is tailored for demanding wildlife use, but:

  • Ricoh CX1: Its longer zoom can reach distant subjects better, but slow AF and lack of burst modes constrain capturing decisive moments.

  • Sigma DP2: Superior image quality but fixed focal length and slower focusing make it a poor choice for wildlife fast action.

Sports Photography

Fast shooting and tracking are essential here, and:

  • Ricoh CX1 is limited by no continuous shooting or tracking AF.

  • Sigma DP2's slow 3 fps burst and deliberate AF also fall short.

Therefore, neither is recommended for sports, especially compared to modern alternatives.

Street Photography

  • Ricoh CX1: Compact and lightweight with quiet operation and decent zoom versatility, it's decent for candid street shots in good light.

  • Sigma DP2: Slightly larger and less discreet but offers exceptional image quality for street portraits and urban landscapes where careful composition is paramount.

Macro Photography

  • Ricoh CX1: Macro focus range as close as 1 cm is impressive, and image stabilization helps. Useful for casual macro shots.

  • Sigma DP2: No specific macro feature; manual focus precision helps but fixed focal length limits framing flexibility.

Night and Astrophotography

  • Both cameras experience noise at high ISO, but the Sigma’s larger sensor generally delivers cleaner results at ISO 200-3200. Sensor stabilization in Ricoh assists at slower shutter speeds but limited maximum ISO hinders low-light flexibility.

Video Capabilities

  • Both cameras provide basic Motion JPEG videos at low resolutions (Ricoh 640x480, Sigma 320x240), unsuitable for modern standards.

  • Lack of microphone or headphone jacks reduces control over audio quality.

Travel Photography

The Ricoh CX1 excels for general travel use thanks to its lens versatility, compact size, and light weight - suited for casual sightseeing.

The Sigma DP2 appeals for travel photographers prioritizing image quality and manual operation but is bulkier and less adaptable.

Professional Workflow

  • Ricoh CX1 lacks raw support, limiting editing latitude.

  • Sigma DP2 allows raw capture with Foveon files, integrating into professional post-processing workflows, especially in still and fine art domains.

User Interface and Controls: Intuition Meets Functionality

Both cameras rely on fixed LCDs; none offer electronic viewfinders.

Ricoh CX1 vs Sigma DP2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

  • The Ricoh CX1 features a 3-inch, high-resolution touchscreen-free display prone to glare outdoors.

  • The Sigma DP2’s 2.5-inch screen is lower resolution and less responsive but supports detailed exposure control menus.

Ricoh’s simplified controls are good for beginners and casual shooters, while Sigma’s manual exposure modes favor enthusiasts desiring precision.

Battery Life and Storage: Practical Considerations

  • Both cameras accept SD/SDHC cards.

  • Ricoh CX1 uses a proprietary DB-70 battery; Sigma DP2 battery details unspecified but similar in endurance to mirrorless compact cameras of the era.

  • Neither excels in battery longevity; plan for spares during longer sessions.

Lens Ecosystem and Accessories

  • Both cameras come with fixed lenses - no interchangeable options.

  • Ricoh’s zoom range lends creative adaptability, while Sigma’s prime lens demands more forethought but yields superior optical quality.

  • Sigma supports external flashes; Ricoh has only built-in flash.

Connectivity and Wireless Features

  • Neither camera provides Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, GPS, or HDMI connectivity.

  • USB 2.0 ports allow tethered transfers, but modern wireless convenience is absent.

Summarizing Strengths and Shortcomings

Strengths Ricoh CX1 Sigma DP2
Versatile zoom lens 28-200mm makes variable shooting easy High-quality prime lens
Image stabilization Sensor-shift assists with shake APS-C Foveon sensor with rich color
Lightweight and compact Pocketable form factor Full manual control + raw support
User-friendly interface Beginner-friendly exposure options Deliberate, creative exposure modes
Weaknesses Ricoh CX1 Sigma DP2
Small sensor limits low-light and dynamic range Lower resolution sensor No image stabilization
No manual exposure modes or raw Slower AF and low burst rate Limited zoom (fixed lens)
Modest video and no wireless features Smaller, dimmer screen Heavier and less compact

Real-World Sample Imaging

In side-by-side shooting tests, the Ricoh CX1’s output is sharp and punchy under good lighting but shows noise and limited dynamic range in shadow areas.

The Sigma DP2 produces images with richer color depth and finer texture rendition, especially in RAW development. However, slower AF means you need more patience composing your shots.

Performance Ratings at a Glance

  • Ricoh CX1 scores higher on portability and shooting versatility.

  • Sigma DP2 leads in image quality and creative control.

Specialized Performance Breakdown

  • Ricoh CX1 excels at travel, casual street, and general-purpose shooting.

  • Sigma DP2 shines in portrait, landscape, and fine-art photography requiring detailed image rendering.

Final Recommendations: Which Camera Fits Your Vision?

Choose the Ricoh CX1 if...

  • You want a lightweight, pocket-friendly camera with a versatile zoom lens.
  • You prefer quick, easy point-and-shoot capabilities for everyday photography.
  • Video and casual family snapshots are part of your workflow.
  • Budget constraints favor a more affordable compact.

Opt for the Sigma DP2 if...

  • Image quality and color rendition are your top priorities.
  • You enjoy manual exposure control and shoot mostly static subjects.
  • Post-processing in RAW is essential to your workflow.
  • You’re comfortable working with a prime lens and slower focus speeds.
  • You seek a specialized camera for portrait, landscape, or artistic photography.

Getting Started: Making the Most of These Cameras

To maximize your results with either camera:

  • Ricoh CX1: Use sensor-shift stabilization and moderate ISO settings for sharp images. Experiment with the wide zoom to discover new compositions.

  • Sigma DP2: Embrace tripod use or steady hands, master manual focus, and tap into the rich RAW files to unlock the Foveon sensor’s full potential.

Both cameras exemplify distinct philosophies - high versatility at a budget-friendly price vs. uncompromising image quality in a compact form. By understanding their core strengths and limitations like we’ve explored, you can pick the camera that best fuels your creative journey.

Check out these cameras in person if you can, handle them, and explore compatible accessories such as additional storage or tripod mounts. Each has unique quirks and charms that shine brightest in the right hands and contexts. Happy shooting!

Ricoh CX1 vs Sigma DP2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX1 and Sigma DP2
 Ricoh CX1Sigma DP2
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Sigma
Model Ricoh CX1 Sigma DP2
Class Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Released 2009-02-19 2009-09-21
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 20.7 x 13.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 285.7mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixels 5 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3456 x 2592 2640 x 1760
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 200
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-200mm (7.1x) 41mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/3.3-5.2 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 1.7
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 2.5"
Display resolution 920k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8 secs 15 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed - 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.00 m 4.30 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 320x240
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 180g (0.40 pounds) 280g (0.62 pounds)
Dimensions 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model DB-70 -
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/MMC card
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $299 $649