Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR3
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34c67/34c6734883b80a006f99e64c346b19b37961391d" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 front"
94 Imaging
36 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced September 2006
- Replacement is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Released January 2010
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-ZX3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR3 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR3, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and ZR3 (14MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and ZR3 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-400 was launched 4 years prior to the ZR3 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic ZR3 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-400 scores vs the ZR3 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR3 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-400 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Panasonic ZR3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic ZR3
E-400 | ZR3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR3 over the Olympus E-400
ZR3 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2010 | ![]() | September 2006 | Fresher by 41 months |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic ZR3
E-400 | ZR3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR3 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-400 provides outer measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Panasonic ZR3 has measurements of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR3 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the E-400 against the ZR3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a163/8a1637b93e30067b34a713d4940ac418dd1205f2" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR3 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR3 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and ZR3 is 77 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53f3e/53f3ee4c13b22e0907965991d031fab62284cda4" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizing only by going over a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and ZR3.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-400 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Panasonic ZR3 will deliver more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36395/36395ba2955919af62f1f51f27a6a655a8943cfa" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2c94/b2c94bd1ccee6786ed1c80fba55c858d7475a0a6" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR3 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-ZX3 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2006-09-14 | 2010-01-26 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 215k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1300s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | AVCHD Lite |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435g (0.96 pounds) | 159g (0.35 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $599 | $280 |