Ricoh CX1 vs Sony HX400V
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31


62 Imaging
45 Features
60 Overall
51
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony HX400V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 660g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Older Model is Sony HX300

Ricoh CX1 vs Sony HX400V Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Ricoh CX1 and Sony HX400V, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and HX400V (20MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The CX1 was brought out 6 years prior to the HX400V and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX400V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going in to a full comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the CX1 scores vs the HX400V in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Ricoh CX1 vs Sony HX400V Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh CX1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh CX1 Gallery & Sony HX400V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Sony HX400V
CX1 | HX400V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX400V over the Ricoh CX1
HX400V | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | ![]() | February 2009 | Fresher by 60 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Sony HX400V
CX1 | HX400V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Ricoh CX1 vs Sony HX400V Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX1 has outer dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Sony HX400V has sizing of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") accompanied by a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh CX1 and Sony HX400V in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the CX1 compared to the HX400V.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the CX1 and HX400V is 93 and 62 respectively.

Ricoh CX1 vs Sony HX400V Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing just by checking specs. The photograph below might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the CX1 and HX400V.
All in all, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Sony HX400V to resolve more detail having its extra 11MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older CX1 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Ricoh CX1 vs Sony HX400V Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX1 vs Sony HX400V Specifications
Ricoh CX1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh CX1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-02-19 | 2014-02-12 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.2 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 8.50 m (ISO Auto) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Flash Off / Autoflash / Fill-flash / Slow Sync. / Advanced Flash / Rear Sync. / Wireless (with optional compliant flash) |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 180g (0.40 lbs) | 660g (1.46 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-70 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $299 | $448 |