Clicky

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G

Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
35
Overall
33
Ricoh CX2 front
 
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Key Specs

Ricoh CX2
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched August 2009
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 4.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-481mm (F) lens
  • 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
  • Announced August 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Overview

Below is a extensive comparison of the Ricoh CX2 versus Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and Galaxy Camera 4G (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The CX2 was announced 4 years prior to the Galaxy Camera 4G and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the CX2 scores vs the Galaxy Camera 4G for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G

 CX2 Galaxy Camera 4G 
Manually focus More exact focus
Display resolution920k0kSharper display (+920k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G over the Ricoh CX2

 Galaxy Camera 4G CX2 
AnnouncedAugust 2012August 2009More recent by 36 months
Display dimension4.8"3"Larger display (+1.8")
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G

 CX2 Galaxy Camera 4G 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Physical Comparison

If you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX2 features physical dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G has sizing of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") having a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).

Analyze the Ricoh CX2 versus Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the CX2 and the Galaxy Camera 4G.

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the CX2 and Galaxy Camera 4G is 93 and 90 respectively.

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's hard to visualize the gap between sensor measurements only by going over technical specs. The graphic here will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the CX2 and Galaxy Camera 4G.

As you can tell, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can expect to see the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G to offer you extra detail with its extra 7MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The older CX2 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh CX2
Portrait photography with Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
25
has manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
30
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh CX2
Street photography with Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (185 grams)
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
61
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (305 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Sports photography information
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Sports photography information
26
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
45
incredible zoom range (23-481mm 20.9 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Travel photography details
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Travel photography details
66
lighter than average (185g)
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
long reach (300mm)
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
72
lighter than others in class (305g)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
quite wide (23mm)
great reach (481mm)
great max aperture (f)
missing Time Lapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX2 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G as a Landscape photography camera
42
has manual focus
really wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual mode
sensor resolution low (9MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
47
quite wide (23mm)
great max aperture (f)
screen larger than average (4.8 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh CX2
Vlogging with Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
30
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (185 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external microphone support
37
quite wide (23mm)
great max aperture (f)
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Optical)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others in class (305 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
missing mic support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX2 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
 Ricoh CX2Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh CX2 Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2009-08-20 2012-08-29
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV 1.4GHz Quad-Core
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Max resolution 3456 x 2592 -
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-300mm (10.7x) 23-481mm (20.9x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.6 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 4.8"
Resolution of display 920 thousand dots 0 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology - 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 secs -
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m (ISO 400) no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 185 grams (0.41 lbs) 305 grams (0.67 lbs)
Dimensions 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID DB-70 -
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at release $341 $550