Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung NX5
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
80 Imaging
55 Features
50 Overall
53
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung NX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 499g - 123 x 87 x 40mm
- Released June 2010
Photography Glossary Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung NX5 Overview
The following is a complete comparison of the Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung NX5, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and NX5 (15MP) and the CX2 (1/2.3") and NX5 (APS-C) possess different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe CX2 was brought out 9 months earlier than the NX5 and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the CX2 matches up against the NX5 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung NX5 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX2 and Samsung NX5. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh CX2 Gallery and Samsung NX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Samsung NX5
| CX2 | NX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX5 over the Ricoh CX2
| NX5 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2010 |  | August 2009 | Newer by 9 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung NX5
| CX2 | NX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung NX5 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX2 has got exterior dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) while the Samsung NX5 has sizing of 123mm x 87mm x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") and a weight of 499 grams (1.10 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung NX5 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at that moment. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the CX2 against the NX5.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the CX2 and NX5 is 93 and 80 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung NX5 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions purely by checking specifications. The pic underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the CX2 and NX5.
Plainly, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The CX2 due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh trickier and the Samsung NX5 will give more detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged CX2 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung NX5 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung NX5 Specifications
| Ricoh CX2 | Samsung NX5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh CX2 | Samsung NX5 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2009-08-20 | 2010-06-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | DRIM Engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 15 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | 11.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 185g (0.41 lb) | 499g (1.10 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 87 x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 400 photos |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | DB-70 | BP1130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $341 | $499 |