Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung SL102
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Additionally Known as ES55
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung SL102, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the CX2 (9MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is pretty similar and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe CX2 was announced 8 months later than the SL102 so they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the CX2 scores vs the SL102 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX2 and Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh CX2 Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Samsung SL102
| CX2 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2009 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 8 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Ricoh CX2
| SL102 | CX2 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung SL102
| CX2 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX2 provides outside measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has proportions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung SL102 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the CX2 compared to the SL102.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX2 and SL102 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing simply by going over specifications. The photograph here may offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the CX2 and SL102.
To sum up, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Samsung SL102 to deliver extra detail with its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more recent CX2 will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Ricoh CX2 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh CX2 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also called as | - | ES55 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-08-20 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 185g (0.41 lbs) | 116g (0.26 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | DB-70 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $341 | $130 |