Clicky

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD9

Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
35
Overall
33
Ricoh CX2 front
 
Sigma SD9 front
Portability
54
Imaging
39
Features
27
Overall
34

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs

Ricoh CX2
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced August 2009
Sigma SD9
(Full Review)
  • 3MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400
  • 1/6000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
  • Announced November 2002
  • Updated by Sigma SD10
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD9 Overview

Its time to look more in depth at the Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD9, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Ricoh and Sigma. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the CX2 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The CX2 was released 6 years after the SD9 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise view of how the CX2 scores against the SD9 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Sigma SD9

 CX2 SD9 
AnnouncedAugust 2009November 2002Newer by 82 months
Display dimensions3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution920k130kCrisper display (+790k dot)

Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Ricoh CX2

 SD9 CX2 

Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Sigma SD9

 CX2 SD9 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch display Neither features Touch display

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to travel with your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX2 enjoys external dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD9 has proportions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).

Analyze the Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD9 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the CX2 vs the SD9.

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD9 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the CX2 and SD9 is 93 and 54 respectively.

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD9 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be hard to see the contrast in sensor dimensions only by researching technical specs. The picture here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the CX2 and SD9.

As you can tell, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The CX2 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Ricoh CX2 will result in greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more modern CX2 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD9 sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Portrait photography features
Sigma SD9 Portrait photography features
25
you can focus manually
no manual mode
can't use external flash
low MP (9 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
47
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
low MP (3MP)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX2 as a Street photography camera
Sigma SD9 as a Street photography camera
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (185 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
43
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
heavier than average in class (950 grams)
maximum ISO low (400)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX2 as a Sports photography camera
Sigma SD9 as a Sports photography camera
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
low MP (9 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
36
great max shutter speed (1/6,000s)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
doesn't have liveview
lack of image stabilization
low MP (3MP)
does not have phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Travel photography information
Sigma SD9 Travel photography information
66
lighter than competitors in class (185g)
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
low MP (9MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
29
lack of Time Lapse function
heavier than average in class (950 grams)
low MP (3MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX2 as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma SD9 as a Landscape photography camera
42
you can focus manually
rather wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual mode
low MP (9MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
41
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Sigma SA mount)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (1.8 inches)
doesn't have liveview
lack of image stabilization
low MP (3MP)
maximum ISO low (400)
lack of Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Vlogging features
Sigma SD9 Vlogging features
30
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (185g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have microphone support
9
no video
Photography Glossary

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX2 and Sigma SD9
 Ricoh CX2Sigma SD9
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Sigma
Model type Ricoh CX2 Sigma SD9
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Introduced 2009-08-20 2002-11-26
Physical type Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 20.7 x 13.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 285.7mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 3 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 3456 x 2592 2268 x 1512
Maximum native ISO 1600 400
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens zoom range 28-300mm (10.7x) -
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.6 -
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Number of lenses - 76
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.7
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 1.8 inch
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dots 130 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 98%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.77x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/6000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m (ISO 400) no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 640x480 None
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 185 gr (0.41 lbs) 950 gr (2.09 lbs)
Physical dimensions 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID DB-70 -
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal Compact Flash Type I or II
Card slots One One
Launch cost $341 $3,001