Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD9
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Announced November 2002
- Updated by Sigma SD10
Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD9, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Ricoh and Sigma. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the CX2 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe CX2 was released 6 years after the SD9 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise view of how the CX2 scores against the SD9 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX2 and Sigma SD9. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX2 Gallery and Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Sigma SD9
CX2 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2009 | November 2002 | Newer by 82 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 130k | Crisper display (+790k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Ricoh CX2
SD9 | CX2 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Sigma SD9
CX2 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX2 enjoys external dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD9 has proportions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD9 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the CX2 vs the SD9.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the CX2 and SD9 is 93 and 54 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to see the contrast in sensor dimensions only by researching technical specs. The picture here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the CX2 and SD9.
As you can tell, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The CX2 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Ricoh CX2 will result in greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more modern CX2 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Ricoh CX2 | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model type | Ricoh CX2 | Sigma SD9 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2009-08-20 | 2002-11-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 3 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 2268 x 1512 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 1.8 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 130 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 185 gr (0.41 lbs) | 950 gr (2.09 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | DB-70 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $341 | $3,001 |