Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A390
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Announced July 2010
- Earlier Model is Sony A380
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A390 Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A390, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and A390 (14MP) and the CX2 (1/2.3") and A390 (APS-C) use different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe CX2 was manufactured 11 months earlier than the A390 so they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the CX2 grades against the A390 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A390 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX2 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh CX2 Gallery and Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Sony A390
CX2 | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Ricoh CX2
A390 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2010 | August 2009 | More recent by 11 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Sony A390
CX2 | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX2 has exterior dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Sony A390 has sizing of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
See the Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A390 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the CX2 vs the A390.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the CX2 and A390 is 93 and 66 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements simply by seeing a spec sheet. The visual underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the CX2 and A390.
As you can see, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The CX2 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony A390 will show greater detail due to its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older CX2 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A390 Specifications
Ricoh CX2 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh CX2 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2009-08-20 | 2010-07-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 185g (0.41 pounds) | 549g (1.21 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 607 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-70 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $341 | $500 |