Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A6300
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/103c7/103c75a67dcbfed70caf5bb728c64082ed228093" alt="Ricoh CX2 front Ricoh CX2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc101/dc10188719485a09ad742701947499d616aae498" alt="Sony Alpha a6300 front Sony Alpha a6300 front"
83 Imaging
66 Features
82 Overall
72
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A6300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Increase to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Older Model is Sony A6000
- Renewed by Sony A6500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A6300 Overview
Here is a thorough review of the Ricoh CX2 and Sony A6300, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the CX2 (1/2.3") and A6300 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The CX2 was unveiled 7 years prior to the A6300 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the CX2 matches up against the A6300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A6300 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX2 & Sony Alpha a6300. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX2 Gallery & Sony A6300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Sony A6300
CX2 | A6300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Ricoh CX2
A6300 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | ![]() | August 2009 | Fresher by 78 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper screen (+2k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Sony A6300
CX2 | A6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX2 features outside measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) and the Sony A6300 has sizing of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh CX2 and Sony A6300 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the CX2 against the A6300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fbad0/fbad08745a6b7b8fb5b40d01f649f0b7769cc53b" alt="Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A6300 size comparison Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A6300 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the CX2 and A6300 is 93 and 83 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14bcd/14bcd59535e7fe86b25642d1044e3b24106724b3" alt="Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A6300 top view buttons comparison Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A6300 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizing only by researching specifications. The graphic here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the CX2 and A6300.
Plainly, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The CX2 with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony A6300 will provide you with greater detail having an extra 15MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older CX2 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd061/cd061a3945d3b639b900a933f016f3b444ff41cf" alt="Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A6300 sensor size comparison Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A6300 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f6c2/7f6c2e1954924857318dff260d4d9d2ff897fe1a" alt="Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A6300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A6300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A6300 Specifications
Ricoh CX2 | Sony Alpha a6300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh CX2 | Sony Alpha a6300 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2009-08-20 | 2016-02-03 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 11.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 185 gr (0.41 pounds) | 404 gr (0.89 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 85 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1437 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-70 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $341 | $889 |