Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A9 II
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
62 Imaging
75 Features
93 Overall
82
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A9 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced June 2010
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Boost to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 678g - 129 x 96 x 76mm
- Revealed October 2019
- Succeeded the Sony A9
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A9 II Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A9 II, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and A9 II (24MP) and the CX3 (1/2.3") and A9 II (Full frame) use different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe CX3 was unveiled 10 years before the A9 II and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera and the Sony A9 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the CX3 matches up versus the A9 II with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A9 II Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX3 & Sony Alpha A9 Mark II. The full galleries are available at Ricoh CX3 Gallery & Sony A9 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Sony A9 II
CX3 | A9 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A9 II over the Ricoh CX3
A9 II | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2019 | June 2010 | Fresher by 113 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1440k | 920k | Crisper screen (+520k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Sony A9 II
CX3 | A9 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A9 II Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX3 offers outer dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Sony A9 II has measurements of 129mm x 96mm x 76mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 678 grams (1.49 lbs).
Check the Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A9 II in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the CX3 vs the A9 II.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the CX3 and A9 II is 92 and 62 respectively.
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A9 II Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizing only by going over a spec sheet. The graphic here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX3 and A9 II.
As you can see, both cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The CX3 using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony A9 II will offer you more detail having an extra 14 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older CX3 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A9 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A9 II Specifications
Ricoh CX3 | Sony Alpha A9 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh CX3 | Sony Alpha A9 Mark II |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2010-06-16 | 2019-10-03 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 847.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 51200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 204800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 693 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 1,440 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,686 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 20.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206g (0.45 lb) | 678g (1.49 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 129 x 96 x 76mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 690 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-100 | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs + continuous, 3 or 5 frames) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II compatible) |
Storage slots | Single | Two |
Price at launch | $329 | $4,498 |