Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-50
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2017
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
In this write-up, we will be looking at the Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-50, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are sold by Ricoh. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the CX4 (10MP) and WG-50 (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe CX4 was introduced 7 years prior to the WG-50 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the CX4 grades versus the WG-50 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX4 and Ricoh WG-50. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX4 Gallery and Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Ricoh WG-50
CX4 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Ricoh CX4
WG-50 | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2017 | August 2010 | Fresher by 82 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Ricoh WG-50
CX4 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX4 comes with outside measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-50 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-50 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the CX4 and the WG-50.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX4 and WG-50 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing merely by checking specifications. The photograph below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the CX4 and WG-50.
To sum up, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Ricoh WG-50 to give more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older CX4 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Ricoh CX4 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model | Ricoh CX4 | Ricoh WG-50 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Launched | 2010-08-19 | 2017-05-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | On, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 lbs) | 193g (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-100 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $211 | $280 |