Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung ST100
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung ST100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.6-4.8) lens
- 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung ST100 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung ST100, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the CX4 (10MP) and ST100 (14MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe CX4 was announced 8 months later than the ST100 and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST100 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short summary of how the CX4 scores against the ST100 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung ST100 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX4 & Samsung ST100. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh CX4 Gallery & Samsung ST100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Samsung ST100
| CX4 | ST100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2010 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 8 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST100 over the Ricoh CX4
| ST100 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1152k |  | 920k | Crisper screen (+232k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Samsung ST100
| CX4 | ST100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung ST100 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX4 has got physical dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung ST100 has sizing of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung ST100 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the CX4 against the ST100.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX4 and ST100 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung ST100 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing only by reviewing technical specs. The graphic underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the CX4 and ST100.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can count on the Samsung ST100 to offer extra detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more modern CX4 provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung ST100 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung ST100 Specifications
| Ricoh CX4 | Samsung ST100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh CX4 | Samsung ST100 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-08-19 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.6-4.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920k dot | 1,152k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | DB-100 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $211 | $250 |