Clicky

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL350

Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
34
Overall
33
Ricoh CX4 front
 
Samsung TL350 front
Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
47
Overall
38

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs

Ricoh CX4
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
  • Released August 2010
Samsung TL350
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
  • 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
  • Released February 2010
  • Additionally Known as WB2000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL350 Overview

Lets look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh CX4 versus Samsung TL350, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the CX4 (10MP) and the TL350 (10MP) is pretty comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The CX4 was launched 6 months later than the TL350 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the CX4 grades vs the TL350 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Samsung TL350

 CX4 TL350 

Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Ricoh CX4

 TL350 CX4 

Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Samsung TL350

 CX4 TL350 
ReleasedAugust 2010February 2010Same generation
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurement
Screen resolution920k920kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX4 provides external dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL350 has proportions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).

Take a look at the Ricoh CX4 versus Samsung TL350 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the CX4 and the TL350.

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL350 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX4 and TL350 is 92 and 94 respectively.

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL350 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing merely by going through specifications. The visual underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the CX4 and TL350.

Plainly, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same MP therefore you should expect comparable quality of photographs though you should always consider the production date of the cameras into account.

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL350 sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Portrait photography factors
Samsung TL350 Portrait photography factors
26
focusing manually
no manual mode
no external flash support
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
35
manual focus
delivers RAW formats
no external flash support
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Street photography features
Samsung TL350 Street photography features
60
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (205g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
65
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
fixed screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Sports photography details
Samsung TL350 Sports photography details
24
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
29
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh CX4
Travel photography with Samsung TL350
66
lighter than competitors in class (205 grams)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
long zoom (300mm)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
60
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
MP count low (10MP)
does not offer selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung TL350 Landscape photography highlights
42
focusing manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
no manual mode
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
50
manual focus
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh CX4
Vlogging with Samsung TL350
30
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (205g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external microphone port
32
relatively wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
does not offer selfie friendly display
no external microphone support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX4 and Samsung TL350
 Ricoh CX4Samsung TL350
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh CX4 Samsung TL350
Also called as - WB2000
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Released 2010-08-19 2010-02-20
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-300mm (10.7x) 24-120mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.6 f/2.4-5.8
Macro focusing distance 1cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Display resolution 920 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8s 16s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 5.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 5.20 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 205 grams (0.45 lbs) 195 grams (0.43 lbs)
Dimensions 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID DB-100 SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal SD/SDHC, internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $211 $400