Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Old Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-6
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof and both are offered by Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the CX5 (10MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe CX5 was manufactured 4 years before the WG-5 GPS which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the CX5 grades against the WG-5 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh CX5 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX5 Gallery and Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| CX5 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Ricoh CX5
| WG-5 GPS | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2015 |  | July 2011 | More modern by 43 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX5 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| CX5 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh CX5 comes with outside dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has specifications of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the CX5 versus the WG-5 GPS.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX5 and WG-5 GPS is 92 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes purely by going over specifications. The pic underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX5 and WG-5 GPS.
Plainly, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to offer extra detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged CX5 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh CX5 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
| Ricoh CX5 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model type | Ricoh CX5 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2015-02-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 14.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) | 236 grams (0.52 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB-100 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $399 | $500 |