Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FH22
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
94 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FH22 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
- Updated by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 170g - 100 x 57 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FS33
Photography Glossary Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FH22 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FH22, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FH22 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FH22 (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-300 was released 6 years earlier than the FH22 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FH22 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-300 scores versus the FH22 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FH22 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Panasonic FH22 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic FH22
| E-300 | FH22 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH22 over the Olympus E-300
| FH22 | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2010 | January 2005 | More modern by 60 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 134k | Crisper display (+96k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FH22
| E-300 | FH22 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FH22 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera often, you should consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 features outer measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FH22 has sizing of 100mm x 57mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") and a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FH22 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-300 against the FH22.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and FH22 is 67 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FH22 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes simply by seeing a spec sheet. The pic below may offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and FH22.
As you can see, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-300 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Panasonic FH22 will show extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FH22 Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 |
| Also called | EVOLT E-300 | Lumix DMC-FS33 |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 134k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 624 grams (1.38 pounds) | 170 grams (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 100 x 57 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $800 | $200 |