Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FH22

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 front
Portability
94
Imaging
36
Features
30
Overall
33

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FH22 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Revealed January 2005
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
  • Updated by Olympus E-330
Panasonic FH22
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 170g - 100 x 57 x 27mm
  • Introduced January 2010
  • Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FS33
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FH22 Overview

Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FH22, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FH22 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FH22 (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-300 was released 6 years earlier than the FH22 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FH22 being a Compact camera.

Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-300 scores versus the FH22 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic FH22

 E-300 FH22 
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Panasonic FH22 over the Olympus E-300

 FH22 E-300 
IntroducedJanuary 2010January 2005More modern by 60 months
Display dimensions3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution230k134kCrisper display (+96k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FH22

 E-300 FH22 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FH22 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry around your camera often, you should consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 features outer measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FH22 has sizing of 100mm x 57mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") and a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FH22 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-300 against the FH22.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FH22 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and FH22 is 67 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FH22 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FH22 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes simply by seeing a spec sheet. The pic below may offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and FH22.

As you can see, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-300 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Panasonic FH22 will show extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FH22 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography info
Panasonic FH22 Portrait photography info
48
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
low MP (8 megapixels)
28
good resolution (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
no manual control
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-300
Street photography with Panasonic FH22
51
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
62
image stabilization (Optical)
offers focus via touch
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography details
Panasonic FH22 Sports photography details
37
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
doesn't have liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
low MP (8MP)
34
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography factors
Panasonic FH22 Travel photography factors
45
has built in flash
missing Timelapse recording
low MP (8 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
67
offers focus via touch
good resolution (14MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography details
Panasonic FH22 Landscape photography details
43
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
small screen (1.8 inch)
doesn't have liveview
lack of image stabilization
low MP (8MP)
low maximum ISO (400)
missing Timelapse recording
41
fairly wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
no manual control
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
missing Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-300
Vlogging with Panasonic FH22
9
can't record video
30
fairly wide (28mm)
touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
display is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing microphone socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FH22 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FH22
 Olympus E-300Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus E-300 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22
Also called EVOLT E-300 Lumix DMC-FS33
Category Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2005-01-10 2010-01-06
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3264 x 2448 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 400 6400
Maximum enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-224mm (8.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 1.8 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 134k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per sec 5.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 5.80 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624 grams (1.38 pounds) 170 grams (0.37 pounds)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 100 x 57 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at release $800 $200