Ricoh G700SE vs Samsung WB35F
88 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47d9e/47d9e78f8a74376d0dbc30182b029c20ad373abd" alt="Ricoh G700SE front Ricoh G700SE front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f91/52f9140fa7006285dc43ba7d1f1fb45d41f5684b" alt="Samsung WB35F front Samsung WB35F front"
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Ricoh G700SE vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 307g - 117 x 68 x 32mm
- Introduced October 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh G700SE vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Here is a extensive overview of the Ricoh G700SE and Samsung WB35F, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the G700SE (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The G700SE was launched 4 years earlier than the WB35F and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple view of how the G700SE grades vs the WB35F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh G700SE vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh G700SE & Samsung WB35F. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh G700SE Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh G700SE over the Samsung WB35F
G700SE | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Ricoh G700SE
WB35F | G700SE | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | ![]() | October 2010 | Fresher by 39 months |
Common features in the Ricoh G700SE and Samsung WB35F
G700SE | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Ricoh G700SE vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera often, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh G700SE features external measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 32mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.3") and a weight of 307 grams (0.68 lbs) while the Samsung WB35F has dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Ricoh G700SE and Samsung WB35F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the G700SE versus the WB35F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f48b7/f48b74a97f3785068613ce2e1e8fbe839be0893c" alt="Ricoh G700SE vs Samsung WB35F size comparison Ricoh G700SE vs Samsung WB35F size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the G700SE and WB35F is 88 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54b8b/54b8b3c96044ec2351551c8ce6f5499a494b7462" alt="Ricoh G700SE vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison Ricoh G700SE vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh G700SE vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizing only by going over technical specs. The photograph underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the G700SE and WB35F.
As you can tell, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can count on the Samsung WB35F to offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The older G700SE is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0447a/0447a0aa069056e83db16b588928d874fede74b2" alt="Ricoh G700SE vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison Ricoh G700SE vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison"
Ricoh G700SE vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43290/4329058232d418bb81b44760e4047eea5eff0a30" alt="Ricoh G700SE vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh G700SE vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh G700SE vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Ricoh G700SE | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh G700SE | Samsung WB35F |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2010-10-13 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Auto red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480, 320 x 240 | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 307g (0.68 lbs) | 194g (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 117 x 68 x 32mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | DB-60 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $0 | $130 |