Ricoh G900 vs Sony NEX-C3
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Ricoh G900 vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2018
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Introduced August 2011
- Replaced the Sony NEX-3
- Replacement is Sony NEX-F3
Ricoh G900 vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
The following is a in depth review of the Ricoh G900 versus Sony NEX-C3, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the G900 (20MP) and NEX-C3 (16MP) and the G900 (1/2.3") and NEX-C3 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe G900 was revealed 6 years after the NEX-C3 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh G900 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the G900 scores versus the NEX-C3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh G900 vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh G900 and Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The full galleries are available at Ricoh G900 Gallery and Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Sony NEX-C3
G900 | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | August 2011 | Newer by 80 months | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 920k | Crisper display (+120k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Ricoh G900
NEX-C3 | G900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Ricoh G900 and Sony NEX-C3
G900 | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Ricoh G900 vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera often, you should take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh G900 has got outside measurements of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony NEX-C3 has specifications of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh G900 versus Sony NEX-C3 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the G900 and the NEX-C3.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the G900 and NEX-C3 is 89 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh G900 vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions just by looking through specifications. The picture underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the G900 and NEX-C3.
To sum up, each of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The G900 with its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Ricoh G900 will render extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The fresher G900 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh G900 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh G900 vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Ricoh G900 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh G900 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2018-02-21 | 2011-08-22 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Flash on, flash off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840x2160 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Supports FlashAir SD cards | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) | 225 gr (0.50 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | 400 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $752 | $343 |