Ricoh G900 vs Sony TX200V
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Ricoh G900 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Released February 2018
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Released January 2012
Ricoh G900 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Ricoh G900 vs Sony TX200V, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the G900 (20MP) and the TX200V (18MP) is very comparable and both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe G900 was manufactured 6 years later than the TX200V and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh G900 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the G900 scores against the TX200V when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh G900 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh G900 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh G900 Gallery and Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Sony TX200V
G900 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | January 2012 | More recent by 74 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Ricoh G900
TX200V | G900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3.3" | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 1040k | Clearer display (+190k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh G900 and Sony TX200V
G900 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Ricoh G900 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh G900 has got exterior measurements of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony TX200V has measurements of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh G900 vs Sony TX200V in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the G900 and the TX200V.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the G900 and TX200V is 89 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh G900 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to imagine the difference in sensor measurements simply by checking out technical specs. The photograph here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the G900 and TX200V.
As you have seen, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You should expect to see the Ricoh G900 to show greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more modern G900 provides a benefit in sensor technology.
Ricoh G900 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh G900 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Ricoh G900 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh G900 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Released | 2018-02-21 | 2012-01-30 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 18MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) | 3.10 m |
Flash options | Flash on, flash off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840x2160 | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Supports FlashAir SD cards | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) | 129 gr (0.28 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | 220 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $752 | $500 |