Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB2200F
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- New Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Introduced January 2014
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung WB2200F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and WB2200F (16MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and WB2200F (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe GR Digital III was revealed 5 years prior to the WB2200F and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the GR Digital III grades against the WB2200F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR Digital III & Samsung WB2200F. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung WB2200F
GR Digital III | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Ricoh GR Digital III
WB2200F | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | July 2009 | More recent by 54 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB2200F
GR Digital III | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh GR Digital III offers outer dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Samsung WB2200F has specifications of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") with a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung WB2200F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the GR Digital III compared to the WB2200F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital III and WB2200F is 92 and 59 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to imagine the difference in sensor measurements merely by researching technical specs. The visual below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital III and WB2200F.
As you can tell, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The GR Digital III having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Samsung WB2200F will render extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The older GR Digital III will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung WB2200F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung WB2200F |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-07-27 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dot |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 1/8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 208 grams (0.46 lbs) | 708 grams (1.56 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | BP-1410 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $399 | $599 |