Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB2200F

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34
Ricoh GR Digital III front
 
Samsung WB2200F front
Portability
59
Imaging
40
Features
48
Overall
43

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Revealed July 2009
  • New Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Samsung WB2200F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB2200F Overview

Lets take a closer look at the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung WB2200F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and WB2200F (16MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and WB2200F (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The GR Digital III was revealed 5 years prior to the WB2200F and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the GR Digital III grades against the WB2200F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung WB2200F

 GR Digital III WB2200F 
Screen resolution920k460kClearer screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 WB2200F GR Digital III 
IntroducedJanuary 2014July 2009More recent by 54 months

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB2200F

 GR Digital III WB2200F 
Focus manually More accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurement
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch screen Neither offers Touch screen

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh GR Digital III offers outer dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Samsung WB2200F has specifications of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") with a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).

Check the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Samsung WB2200F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the GR Digital III compared to the WB2200F.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB2200F size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital III and WB2200F is 92 and 59 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB2200F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very hard to imagine the difference in sensor measurements merely by researching technical specs. The visual below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital III and WB2200F.

As you can tell, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The GR Digital III having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Samsung WB2200F will render extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The older GR Digital III will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB2200F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Portrait photography features
Samsung WB2200F Portrait photography features
40
has manual focus
saves RAW formats
low resolution (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
44
manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
features face detect autofocus
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Street photography advice
Samsung WB2200F Street photography advice
55
saves RAW formats
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/1.7")
40
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
heavier than competition in class (708g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Sports photography advice
Samsung WB2200F Sports photography advice
17
can't change focal length (28mm)
no image stabilization
low resolution (10MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect auto focus
53
great zoom range (20-1200mm 60.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
features tracking focus
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB2200F as a Travel photography camera
63
flash built-in
good max aperture (f1.9)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
51
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (20mm)
great zoom (1200mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (708 grams)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Landscape photography info
Samsung WB2200F Landscape photography info
45
has manual focus
good max aperture (f1.9)
screen size is good (3 inches)
saves RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
no image stabilization
low resolution (10MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
46
manual focus
fairly wide (20mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Vlogging highlights
Samsung WB2200F Vlogging highlights
25
good max aperture (f1.9)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have external microphone jack
25
fairly wide (20mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
doesn't have mic port
heavier than competition in class (708 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB2200F
 Ricoh GR Digital IIISamsung WB2200F
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GR Digital III Samsung WB2200F
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2009-07-27 2014-01-07
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip GR engine III -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 20-1200mm (60.0x)
Max aperture f/1.9 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus distance 1cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of display 920 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 200 thousand dot
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1 secs 1/8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 8.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m 6.00 m (ISO Auto)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 208 grams (0.46 lbs) 708 grams (1.56 lbs)
Dimensions 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - BP-1410
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD, SDHC, SCXC
Storage slots 1 1
Retail price $399 $599