Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB250F
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB250F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and WB250F (14MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and WB250F (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR Digital III was unveiled 4 years prior to the WB250F which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the GR Digital III grades vs the WB250F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR Digital III & Samsung WB250F. The full galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung WB250F
GR Digital III | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Ricoh GR Digital III
WB250F | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | July 2009 | Newer by 42 months | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB250F
GR Digital III | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital III has got external dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Samsung WB250F has measurements of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB250F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the GR Digital III versus the WB250F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital III and WB250F is 92 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading specs. The pic underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital III and WB250F.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital III using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB250F will offer you greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung WB250F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung WB250F |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-07-27 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1s | 16s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 208g (0.46 pounds) | 226g (0.50 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $399 | $250 |