Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB250F

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34
Ricoh GR Digital III front
 
Samsung WB250F front
Portability
93
Imaging
38
Features
44
Overall
40

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Revealed July 2009
  • Refreshed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
Samsung WB250F
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
  • Introduced January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB250F Overview

Here, we will be analyzing the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB250F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and WB250F (14MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and WB250F (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The GR Digital III was unveiled 4 years prior to the WB250F which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the GR Digital III grades vs the WB250F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung WB250F

 GR Digital III WB250F 
Focus manually Very exact focus
Screen resolution920k460kClearer screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 WB250F GR Digital III 
IntroducedJanuary 2013July 2009Newer by 42 months
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB250F

 GR Digital III WB250F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurements
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison

If you're going to travel with your camera, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital III has got external dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Samsung WB250F has measurements of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).

Check out the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB250F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the GR Digital III versus the WB250F.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB250F size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital III and WB250F is 92 and 93 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB250F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading specs. The pic underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital III and WB250F.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital III using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB250F will offer you greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB250F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB250F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Portrait photography advice
Samsung WB250F Portrait photography advice
40
manual focus
supports RAW files
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
36
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
includes face detect autofocus
no manual focus
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Street photography factors
Samsung WB250F Street photography factors
55
supports RAW files
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/1.7")
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (226g)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
Sports photography with Samsung WB250F
17
focal length is fixed (28mm)
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (10MP)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
52
amazing zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Travel photography factors
Samsung WB250F Travel photography factors
63
built-in flash
fast max aperture (f1.9)
resolution not great (10MP)
does not posses selfie friendly display
69
lighter than competitors (226 grams)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
very long reach (432mm)
does not have Timelapse function
does not have a selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
Landscape photography with Samsung WB250F
45
manual focus
fast max aperture (f1.9)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
supports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
44
really wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
does not have Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Vlogging advice
Samsung WB250F Vlogging advice
25
fast max aperture (f1.9)
does not posses selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
missing external mic socket
35
really wide (24mm)
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors (226 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
does not have microphone support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB250F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB250F
 Ricoh GR Digital IIISamsung WB250F
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GR Digital III Samsung WB250F
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2009-07-27 2013-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor GR engine III -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) 24-432mm (18.0x)
Maximal aperture f/1.9 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 920k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 1s 16s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate - 8.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual -
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 208g (0.46 pounds) 226g (0.50 pounds)
Physical dimensions 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Price at release $399 $250