Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-5T
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
89 Imaging
58 Features
79 Overall
66
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-5T Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
- Revealed August 2013
- Superseded the Sony NEX-5R
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-5T Overview
The following is a detailed overview of the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-5T, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and NEX-5T (16MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and NEX-5T (APS-C) have different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe GR Digital III was unveiled 5 years earlier than the NEX-5T which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-5T being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the GR Digital III scores against the NEX-5T with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-5T Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony Alpha NEX-5T. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery and Sony NEX-5T Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony NEX-5T
GR Digital III | NEX-5T |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5T over the Ricoh GR Digital III
NEX-5T | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2013 | July 2009 | Newer by 49 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 920k | Sharper screen (+2k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony NEX-5T
GR Digital III | NEX-5T | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-5T Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital III has outside measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-5T has sizing of 111mm x 59mm x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") along with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-5T in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the GR Digital III vs the NEX-5T.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital III and NEX-5T is 92 and 89 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-5T Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions simply by going through a spec sheet. The picture here might provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital III and NEX-5T.
Clearly, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital III using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony NEX-5T will show more detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-5T Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-5T Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Alpha NEX-5T | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Alpha NEX-5T |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2009-07-27 | 2013-08-27 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR engine III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 99 |
Cross type focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | Tilt Up 180° Down 50° TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 7.00 m (ISO100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x1080 (60p/60i/24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 208 gr (0.46 lb) | 276 gr (0.61 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.0 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1015 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes ((10/2 sec. delay), Self-timer (Cont.) (with 10 sec. delay; 3/5 exposures)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $399 | $400 |