Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX200V
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34


66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Launched May 2012
- Old Model is Sony HX100V
- Later Model is Sony HX300

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX200V Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Sony HX200V, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and HX200V (18MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and HX200V (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.

The GR Digital III was brought out 3 years before the HX200V which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the GR Digital III matches up vs the HX200V in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX200V Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony HX200V
GR Digital III | HX200V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Ricoh GR Digital III
HX200V | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2012 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 33 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer display (+2k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony HX200V
GR Digital III | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital III has exterior measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Sony HX200V has sizing of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
See the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Sony HX200V in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the GR Digital III compared to the HX200V.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital III and HX200V is 92 and 66 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading through specifications. The picture underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the GR Digital III and HX200V.
To sum up, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital III because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Sony HX200V will give you greater detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX200V Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-07-27 | 2012-05-11 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR engine III | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 18MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 12.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 208g (0.46 pounds) | 583g (1.29 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 450 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $399 | $480 |