Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX200V

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34
Ricoh GR Digital III front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V front
Portability
66
Imaging
42
Features
55
Overall
47

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX200V Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Introduced July 2009
  • Refreshed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
Sony HX200V
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
  • Launched May 2012
  • Old Model is Sony HX100V
  • Later Model is Sony HX300
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX200V Overview

Here, we are reviewing the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Sony HX200V, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and HX200V (18MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and HX200V (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The GR Digital III was brought out 3 years before the HX200V which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the GR Digital III matches up vs the HX200V in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony HX200V

 GR Digital III HX200V 

Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 HX200V GR Digital III 
LaunchedMay 2012July 2009More modern by 33 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution922k920kClearer display (+2k dot)

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony HX200V

 GR Digital III HX200V 
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Display size3"3"Same display sizing
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch display Absent Touch display

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital III has exterior measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Sony HX200V has sizing of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).

See the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Sony HX200V in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the GR Digital III compared to the HX200V.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX200V size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital III and HX200V is 92 and 66 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX200V top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading through specifications. The picture underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the GR Digital III and HX200V.

To sum up, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital III because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Sony HX200V will give you greater detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX200V sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Portrait photography advice
Sony HX200V Portrait photography advice
40
you can focus manually
delivers RAW formats
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
45
you can focus manually
good resolution (18MP)
provides face detection focusing
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Street photography factors
Sony HX200V Street photography factors
55
delivers RAW formats
no moving screen
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
51
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than competition (583g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Sports photography camera
Sony HX200V as a Sports photography camera
17
can't change focal length (28mm)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
has no phase detect auto focus
56
long zoom range (27-810mm 30.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (18 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
great battery pack (450 CIPA)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Travel photography camera
Sony HX200V as a Travel photography camera
63
has built in flash
very good max aperture (f1.9)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly display
57
great battery pack (450 shots)
good resolution (18 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (27mm)
long zoom (810mm)
missing Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (583 grams)
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Landscape photography features
Sony HX200V Landscape photography features
45
you can focus manually
very good max aperture (f1.9)
screen size is good (3 inch)
delivers RAW formats
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
50
you can focus manually
decently wide (27mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (18MP)
great battery pack (450 shots)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
missing Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Vlogging camera
Sony HX200V as a Vlogging camera
25
very good max aperture (f1.9)
does not feature selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external mic port
27
decently wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not posses selfie friendly display
missing external microphone socket
more heavy than competition (583g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX200V Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony HX200V
 Ricoh GR Digital IIISony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Sony
Model Ricoh GR Digital III Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2009-07-27 2012-05-11
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by GR engine III BIONZ
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 18MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4896 x 3672
Highest native ISO 1600 12800
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 27-810mm (30.0x)
Maximum aperture f/1.9 f/2.8-5.6
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 920k dots 922k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech - XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) Electronic
Features
Min shutter speed 1 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m 12.40 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 208g (0.46 pounds) 583g (1.29 pounds)
Physical dimensions 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 450 images
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $399 $480