Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Old Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Announced November 2009
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless and they are both offered by Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is fairly well matched but the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) posses different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe GR Digital IV was unveiled 23 months later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro making them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the GR Digital IV scores against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
GR Digital IV | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2011 | November 2009 | Fresher by 23 months | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 920k | Sharper display (+310k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | GR Digital IV |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
GR Digital IV | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh GR Digital IV offers exterior dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the GR Digital IV versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital IV and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 92 and 77 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing merely by reading through technical specs. The graphic underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital IV and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can tell, both the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital IV using its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh tougher and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will resolve greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The more modern GR Digital IV should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2011-09-15 | 2009-11-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1s | 180s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 lbs) | 453g (1.00 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 images | 320 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB65 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $599 | $566 |