Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
90 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Announced September 2011
- Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 283g - 133 x 71 x 19mm
- Launched January 2014
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung Galaxy Camera 2, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and Galaxy Camera 2 (16MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and Galaxy Camera 2 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe GR Digital IV was announced 3 years earlier than the Galaxy Camera 2 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the GR Digital IV grades vs the Galaxy Camera 2 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung Galaxy Camera 2. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
GR Digital IV | Galaxy Camera 2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | 1037k | Sharper display (+193k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
Galaxy Camera 2 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | September 2011 | More recent by 28 months | |
Display dimension | 4.8" | 3" | Larger display (+1.8") | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
GR Digital IV | Galaxy Camera 2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh GR Digital IV provides outside measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 has specifications of 133mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.2" x 2.8" x 0.7") with a weight of 283 grams (0.62 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the GR Digital IV compared to the Galaxy Camera 2.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital IV and Galaxy Camera 2 is 92 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to envision the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading specifications. The graphic below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital IV and Galaxy Camera 2.
Plainly, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The GR Digital IV using its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 will deliver greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older GR Digital IV is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2011-09-15 | 2014-01-02 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | 1.6GHz Quad-Core Exynos |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 4.8" |
Resolution of screen | 1,230 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | HD Super Clear Touch Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1 secs | 16 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, fill-in, slow sync, flash off, redeye fix |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) | 283 grams (0.62 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 133 x 71 x 19mm (5.2" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 images | 400 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB65 | Built-in |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 5, or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $599 | $400 |