Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL620
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched September 2011
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Also referred to as PL65
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung SL620, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is relatively close but the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and SL620 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GR Digital IV was introduced 2 years after the SL620 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the GR Digital IV matches up versus the SL620 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR Digital IV & Samsung SL620. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery & Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung SL620
GR Digital IV | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2011 | February 2009 | Newer by 32 months | |
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
SL620 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung SL620
GR Digital IV | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital IV has got outer measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung SL620 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung SL620 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the GR Digital IV compared to the SL620.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and SL620 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions purely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital IV and SL620.
Clearly, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital IV with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Samsung SL620 will result in extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more recent GR Digital IV will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung SL620 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung SL620 |
Other name | - | PL65 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2011-09-15 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 1,230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lb) | 168 gr (0.37 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB65 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $599 | $200 |