Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL620

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
 
Samsung SL620 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
13
Overall
26

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Launched September 2011
  • Succeeded the Ricoh GR Digital III
Samsung SL620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Launched February 2009
  • Also referred to as PL65
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL620 Overview

Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung SL620, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is relatively close but the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and SL620 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The GR Digital IV was introduced 2 years after the SL620 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the GR Digital IV matches up versus the SL620 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung SL620

 GR Digital IV SL620 
LaunchedSeptember 2011February 2009Newer by 32 months
Manually focus Dial exact focus
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1230k230kSharper screen (+1000k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 SL620 GR Digital IV 

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung SL620

 GR Digital IV SL620 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital IV has got outer measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung SL620 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

Contrast the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung SL620 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the GR Digital IV compared to the SL620.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL620 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and SL620 is 92 and 94 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL620 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison

Generally, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions purely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital IV and SL620.

Clearly, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital IV with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Samsung SL620 will result in extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more recent GR Digital IV will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL620 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography highlights
Samsung SL620 Portrait photography highlights
41
you can focus manually
saves RAW formats
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/1.7")
26
comes with face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
Street photography with Samsung SL620
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/1.7")
47
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
heavier than competition in class (168g)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
Sports photography with Samsung SL620
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
better than average battery (390 CIPA)
fixed focal length (28mm)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect auto focus
17
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
Travel photography with Samsung SL620
67
better than average battery (390 CIPA)
built-in flash
fast max aperture (f1.9)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
50
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse function
heavier than competition in class (168 grams)
low megapixels (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung SL620 as a Landscape photography camera
53
you can focus manually
fast max aperture (f1.9)
good sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
better than average battery (390 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/1.7")
23
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging advice
Samsung SL620 Vlogging advice
29
fast max aperture (f1.9)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
display is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have external mic socket
24
comes with face detection focus
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external mic support
heavier than competition in class (168g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL620 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung SL620
 Ricoh GR Digital IVSamsung SL620
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GR Digital IV Samsung SL620
Other name - PL65
Class Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Launched 2011-09-15 2009-02-17
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 35-175mm (5.0x)
Max aperture f/1.9 f/2.8-5.7
Macro focus distance 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 4.8 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 1,230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1 secs 8 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m 4.60 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 190 gr (0.42 lb) 168 gr (0.37 lb)
Physical dimensions 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 390 photographs -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model DB65 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Retail price $599 $200