Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A7S III
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
61 Imaging
65 Features
92 Overall
75
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A7S III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched September 2011
- Old Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 102400 (Boost to 409600)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 699g - 129 x 97 x 81mm
- Announced July 2020
- Superseded the Sony A7S II
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A7S III Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Sony A7S III, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Pro Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and the A7S III (12MP) is fairly similar but the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and A7S III (Full frame) possess different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR Digital IV was unveiled 9 years prior to the A7S III and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sony A7S III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a brief view of how the GR Digital IV matches up vs the A7S III with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A7S III Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony Alpha A7S III. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Sony A7S III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sony A7S III
GR Digital IV | A7S III |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A7S III over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
A7S III | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2020 | September 2011 | More recent by 107 months | |
Display type | Fully articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1440k | 1230k | Clearer display (+210k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony A7S III
GR Digital IV | A7S III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A7S III Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital IV provides physical dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony A7S III has sizing of 129mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.2") with a weight of 699 grams (1.54 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Sony A7S III in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the GR Digital IV compared to the A7S III.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and A7S III is 92 and 61 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A7S III Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to picture the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading a spec sheet. The graphic below should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital IV and A7S III.
As you can see, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The GR Digital IV having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Sony A7S III will offer you extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The older GR Digital IV is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A7S III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A7S III Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Alpha A7S III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Alpha A7S III |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2011-09-15 | 2020-07-21 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz XR |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 847.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4240 x 2832 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 102400 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 409600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 759 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,230k dot | 1,440k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 9,440k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.91x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 120p / 280 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 100p / 280 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 200 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 50p / 200 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 140 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 140 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 100p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, XAVC S, XAVC HS, XAVC S-1, H.264, H.265 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 lb) | 699g (1.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 129 x 97 x 81mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 85 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 2993 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photographs | 600 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB65 | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | Dual SD/CFexpress Type A slots |
Storage slots | 1 | Two |
Cost at release | $599 | $3,499 |