Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 III
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
53 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Introduced March 2016
- Earlier Model is Sony RX10 II
- Replacement is Sony RX10 IV
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 III Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 III, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and RX10 III (1") possess totally different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe GR Digital IV was brought out 5 years prior to the RX10 III and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise view of how the GR Digital IV grades versus the RX10 III in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 III Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Sony RX10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sony RX10 III
GR Digital IV | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | 1229k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
RX10 III | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2016 | September 2011 | More recent by 55 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony RX10 III
GR Digital IV | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV provides external dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Sony RX10 III has measurements of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") accompanied by a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 III in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the GR Digital IV vs the RX10 III.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and RX10 III is 92 and 53 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to visualise the difference between sensor measurements only by reading through specs. The graphic below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital IV and RX10 III.
All in all, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The GR Digital IV because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony RX10 III will give more detail having its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older GR Digital IV is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-09-15 | 2016-03-29 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,230k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 14.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) | 1051 grams (2.32 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 472 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photographs | 420 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB65 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $599 | $1,398 |