Ricoh GR II vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Revealed June 2015
- Replaced the Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Launched August 2012
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Overview
Below, we are matching up the Ricoh GR II versus Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GR II (16MP) and the Galaxy Camera 4G (16MP) is very close but the GR II (APS-C) and Galaxy Camera 4G (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR II was launched 2 years later than the Galaxy Camera 4G and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the GR II scores versus the Galaxy Camera 4G with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR II and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh GR II Gallery and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
GR II | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2015 | August 2012 | More recent by 35 months | |
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Display resolution | 1230k | 0k | Sharper display (+1230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G over the Ricoh GR II
Galaxy Camera 4G | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 4.8" | 3" | Larger display (+1.8") | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
GR II | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR II has got outer dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) while the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G has dimensions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GR II versus Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the GR II compared to the Galaxy Camera 4G.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR II and Galaxy Camera 4G is 89 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements only by looking through technical specs. The photograph here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the GR II and Galaxy Camera 4G.
As you have seen, both cameras have got the exact same megapixel count but different sensor measurements. The GR II features the larger sensor which will make achieving shallow DOF less difficult. The more recent GR II should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Specifications
Ricoh GR II | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR II | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2015-06-17 | 2012-08-29 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR Engine V | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Full resolution | 4928 x 3264 | - |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 4.8" |
Screen resolution | 1,230 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 300 seconds | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 251 gr (0.55 lbs) | 305 gr (0.67 lbs) |
Dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1078 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-65 | - |
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $599 | $550 |