Clicky

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung ST93

Portability
89
Imaging
59
Features
55
Overall
57
Ricoh GR II front
 
Samsung ST93 front
Portability
97
Imaging
38
Features
20
Overall
30

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs

Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
  • 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
  • Introduced June 2015
  • Superseded the Ricoh GR
Samsung ST93
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Launched April 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung ST93 Overview

Its time to look much closer at the Ricoh GR II versus Samsung ST93, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GR II (16MP) and the ST93 (16MP) is pretty close but the GR II (APS-C) and ST93 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The GR II was launched 4 years after the ST93 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung ST93 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the GR II scores against the ST93 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Samsung ST93

 GR II ST93 
LaunchedJune 2015April 2011More modern by 51 months
Manual focus Very accurate focusing
Screen resolution1230k460kCrisper screen (+770k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Ricoh GR II

 ST93 GR II 

Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Samsung ST93

 GR II ST93 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurement
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Neither has Touch screen

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung ST93 Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR II has outer dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) and the Samsung ST93 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).

Compare the Ricoh GR II versus Samsung ST93 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the GR II compared to the ST93.

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung ST93 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the GR II and ST93 is 89 and 97 respectively.

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung ST93 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung ST93 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes simply by researching technical specs. The image below will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the GR II and ST93.

As you can tell, both of these cameras come with the identical resolution albeit different sensor sizes. The GR II includes the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving bokeh easier. The fresher GR II should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung ST93 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung ST93 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung ST93 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR II Portrait photography features
Samsung ST93 Portrait photography features
75
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports face detection focus
delivers RAW files
29
megapixel count good (16MP)
manual focus not available
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR II Street photography factors
Samsung ST93 Street photography factors
74
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
lighter than average (251 grams)
good ISO range (25,600)
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
49
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR II Sports photography features
Samsung ST93 Sports photography features
50
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports tracking autofocus
focal length is fixed (28mm)
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
has no phase detect auto focus
27
megapixel count good (16MP)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR II Travel photography info
Samsung ST93 Travel photography info
67
lighter than average (251g)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
missing Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
70
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
great maximum aperture (f)
lack of Timelapse mode
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR II as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung ST93 as a Landscape photography camera
59
has manual focus
decent sized screen (3 inch)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
missing Time Lapse recording
38
great maximum aperture (f)
nice screen size (3 inches)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh GR II
Vlogging with Samsung ST93
32
supports face detection focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average (251g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
missing external mic jack
27
great maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of microphone support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung ST93 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR II and Samsung ST93
 Ricoh GR IISamsung ST93
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GR II Samsung ST93
Category Large Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Introduced 2015-06-17 2011-04-20
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip GR Engine V -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.7 x 15.7mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 372.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Highest resolution 4928 x 3264 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) ()
Highest aperture f/2.8-16.0 -
Macro focus distance 10cm -
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 1,230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 300 secs 8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 4.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) -
Flash options Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless -
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 251 grams (0.55 lbs) 110 grams (0.24 lbs)
Physical dimensions 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 13.7 not tested
DXO Low light score 1078 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 photographs -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model DB-65 -
Self timer Yes -
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $599 -