Ricoh GR II vs Samsung ST95
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
99 Imaging
39 Features
19 Overall
31
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Introduced June 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh GR II vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Ricoh GR II and Samsung ST95, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GR II (16MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is fairly close but the GR II (APS-C) and ST95 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe GR II was manufactured 4 years after the ST95 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go through a full comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the GR II matches up against the ST95 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh GR II vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR II and Samsung ST95. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR II Gallery and Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Samsung ST95
| GR II | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2015 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 54 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+770k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Ricoh GR II
| ST95 | GR II |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Samsung ST95
| GR II | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera, you should think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR II has outer measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") with a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST95 has sizing of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GR II and Samsung ST95 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the GR II compared to the ST95.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the GR II and ST95 is 89 and 99 respectively.
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by viewing technical specs. The image here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the GR II and ST95.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have got the exact same MP but not the same sensor dimensions. The GR II features the larger sensor which should make achieving shallower DOF less difficult. The fresher GR II is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
| Ricoh GR II | Samsung ST95 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh GR II | Samsung ST95 |
| Class | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2015-06-17 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | GR Engine V | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Full resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | () |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 1,230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 300 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 251g (0.55 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 1078 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $599 | $145 |
